You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Global Warming Undeniable
2010-08-03
Now, why would the editors of National Geographic have an agenda?
Is that a trick question?
"Global warming is undeniable," and it's happening fast, a new U.S. government report says.

An in-depth analysis of ten climate indicators all point to a marked warming over the past three decades, with the most recent decade being the hottest on record, according to the latest of the U.S. National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration's annual "State of the Climate" Hanson reports, which was released Wednesday. Reliable global climate record-keeping began in the 1880s.
So we're looking at 120 years of data? Not much adjustment required for that. How'd you hide the decline?
The report focused on climate changes measured in 2009 in the context of newly available data on long-term developments.
"Long-term" meaning over the last few decades.
For instance, surface air temperatures recorded from more than 7,000 weather stations around the world over the past few decades confirm an "unmistakable upward trend," the study says.
Ahhhh! A new definition of "Global Warming"! Lots of stations, short time period!
I noticed a weather station near my home the other day. It was on an overpass above the intersection of two major highways in the middle of a big city.
And for the first time, scientists put data from climate indicators--such as ocean temperature and sea-ice cover--together in one place. Their consistency "jumps off the page at you," report co-author Derek Arndt said.

Three hundred scientists analyzed data on 37 climate indicators, but homed in on 10 that the study says are especially revealing.

Those indicators include: humidity, sea-surface temperature, sea ice cover, snow cover, ocean heat content, glacier cover, air temperature in the lower atmosphere, sea level, temperature over land, and temperature over oceans.
And the accuracy of the data is consistent over the period?
The influx of greenhouses gases into the atmosphere has also hit oceans particularly hard, the NOAA report says.

New evidence suggests that more than 90 percent of that heat trapped by greenhouses gases over the past 50 years has been absorbed into the oceans.
Oh, I'm sorry; not 30-40 years, the period examined must be as much as 50 years. That's a great base for extrapolation!
Because water expands as it warms, the added ocean heat is contributing to sea level rise as well as to the rapid melting of Arctic summer sea ice. That melting in 2010 is on track to be worse than 2007, when Arctic ice cover reached its lowest point on record.
Like my gin-and-tonic overflows when the ice melts.
Such climatic shifts are already ushering in extreme weather, which plagued much of the globe in 2009, according to the report.

The NOAA report--published in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society--is different from other climate publications, because it's based on observed data, not computer models, making it the "climate system's annual scorecard," the authors wrote. "It's telling us what's going on in the real world, rather than the imaginary world," said Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist at the Boulder, Colorado-based National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Another revelation: Computer models are no good!
Even so, the report "does not carry the authority of the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] by any means," Trenberth noted. That's partially because IPCC reports--the latest of which came out in 2007 with a similar claim that warming is "unequivocal"--are produced on longer time scales, with more time for review.

And even with real-world data, "the theory with regard to global warming is still incomplete"--especially since the atmosphere is so complex, Trenberth cautioned. This "can be seen at a glance," for example, "by looking out of the window at the wondrous, great variety in clouds."
I'm sure the sixth-graders lap this up like warm milk.
Posted by:Bobby

#14  Global warming IS undeniable. Ten thousand years ago the place where I live was covered by two miles of ice. Then those damn SUV driving saber tooth tigers caused the environment to heat up.
Posted by: DMFD   2010-08-03 20:15  

#13  The same National Geographic that said we had hit peak oil, this time for really really real in 2004.

Then there's this little inconvenient truth for them.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-08-03 19:27  

#12  Have they ever tried to correlate the data to the output energy from the sun? From my understanding, the sun has been getting hotter of time.
Posted by: miscellaneous   2010-08-03 17:24  

#11  Yeah, well, you know...don't kill the job.
Posted by: tu3031   2010-08-03 17:06  

#10  "You keep using that word..."
Posted by: mojo   2010-08-03 17:02  

#9  Article: "Three hundred scientists analyzed data on 37 climate indicators, but homed in on 10 that the study says are especially revealing."

Translation: We kept only the indicator's that support our position. The 300 scientists made this conclusion while attending a junket conference in Tahiti.

Article: "Such climatic shifts are already ushering in extreme weather, which plagued much of the globe in 2009, according to the report."

Translation: Extreme weather is a new phenomenon that did not exist prior to 2009.

Article: "An in-depth analysis of ten climate indicators all point to a marked warming over the past three decades,..."

Translation: Just ignore the two decades of cooling prior to the 3 decades of warming. Our thermometer thingies weren't properly calibrated then.

Article: "Reliable global climate record-keeping began in the 1880s."*

*Fine Print: "Reliable global climate record-keeping began in the 1880s, except for long periods of war, civil, social and economic disruption. Global in the sense that it covered much of North America. May not include large parts Europe, Central and South America, Central and East Asia, all of Africa, much of the Pacific, Indian, Arctic, and Atlantic Oceans and Antarctica. Reliable in the sense that the measurements have all been properly fudged adjusted to take into account the Urban Heat Island Effect, proximity to asphalt parking lots and the hot air discharge of nearby air conditioners.
Posted by: Eboreg   2010-08-03 13:34  

#8  Denial *is* possible. Even fun!
Posted by: Iblis   2010-08-03 11:16  

#7  Two critical things to remember about the whole MMGW thing.

1) Carbon Dioxide in Earth's atmosphere amounts to 390 ppmv (parts per million by volume) (or 0.0390% of the total). Of that, the human contribution is 12 ppmv (~3%). Three percent of a trace gas. Even the serious MMGW scientists say that the human contribution alone cannot do squat, *unless* is somehow makes the *natural* CO2 producers crank out vastly more CO2, in a self-reinforcing cycle.

And no such cycle, out of a dozen or so proposed cycles, has been proven, and several have been disproven.

2) The Earth's thermosphere, which is the "greenhouse blanket" around the Earth, mitigating temperatures, has radically contracted in the last two years, almost certainly caused by the lack of solar activity. With this contraction, *vastly* more powerful than *anything* humans could do, we are getting just the *opposite* of a greenhouse effect.

A greenhouse effect results in stable temperatures that are a little warmer than the air outside the greenhouse. The opposite of this is lower than normal lows *and* higher than normal highs, at the same time. Remember last winter?

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/07/16/nasa.upper.atmosphere.shrinking/index.html

The headline begins with "Scientists baffled..." This is climate science in a nutshell. For anyone to declare that MMGW exists is utter hooey.

And it has nothing to do with whether the Earth is getting warmer or cooler right now, which is entirely natural.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2010-08-03 09:58  

#6  Any satellites recording lower atmosphere warming?

All were seeing is an unmistakable divergence of figures.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2010-08-03 09:22  

#5  The question is, how much? 1%? 10%? Not 100%.
Another key question is, what can we do that will stop global warming by the end of the lifetime of our grandchildren? There is ZERO evidence concerning this. If the human race and its current economic activity were to vanish overnight, climate trends would continue for decades or centuries regardless.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-08-03 09:20  

#4  For instance, surface air temperatures recorded from more than 7,000 weather stations around the world over the past few decades confirm an "unmistakable upward trend," the study says.

Well Doh.... when you start placing the 'asphalt and AC weather stations' in the middle of asphalt parking lots and next to AC exhaust... the measurements tend to go up. They also tend to become completely irrelevant.

But then accuracy really isn't the goal is it?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2010-08-03 08:41  

#3  I have said it before and I'll say it again. Yes, there is global warming going on. The ice sheets have been retreating for thousands of years (Long Island was a glacial end moraine.) I would be very surprised if a PART of it was not caused by fossil fuel combustion. The question is, how much? 1%? 10%? Not 100%.
Next point: Crap and trade will do nothing to reduce global warming. It is merely camoflage for the hidden real purpose of the legislation - global income redistribution. In fact, by transferring combustion from the more efficient and modern world to the less developed world the CO2 production per unit of economic activity will go UP.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-08-03 08:37  

#2  I'm sure the sixth-graders lap this up like warm milk.

Their teachers do as well.
Posted by: NCMike   2010-08-03 08:30  

#1  let it go people....
Posted by: armyguy   2010-08-03 07:31  

00:00