| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Lurid Crime Tales- |
| New Black Panther Leader: A Black Man Can't Be a Racist |
| 2010-07-20 |
The latest controversy occurred on Fox News yesterday, when Malik Shabazz, chairman of the New Black Panther Party, made this statement:A black man really -- or a black leader -- cannot be a racist. You cannot take the slave who takes the whip from the slave master and begins beating the slave master -- you cannot call the slave a reverse racist. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #15 Spike lee was saying this sort of thing back, oh, right before his movies started tanking in the box office and he was forced back into doing commercials. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2010-07-20 23:20 |
| #14 > because the handing out of Government goodies is a zero-sum game Oh no its not. It's vastly net negative as what's taxed to fund the entitled is EXTERMELY economically damaging. |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2010-07-20 18:34 |
| #13 So shabazz, as long as black thugs outside of voting places don't use whips, but just batons, its all peachy keen? ------ There are two kinds of racism: positive and negative. Negative racism is when a person is put down and oppressed because of their skin color. That is the kind of racism Shabazz talks about. Positive racism is when a person is held up, defended, buttered up, praised, and rewarded because of their skin color. Shabazz, and all liberals, deny this is racism because it isn't negative. However, when it comes to Government goodies, positive racism (the supposed good kind) implies and generates negative racism (the bad kind), because the handing out of Government goodies is a zero-sum game due to the goodies being limited. Thus, to give a dollar to help a black man inevitably denies a dollar to help anyone else. If you don't believe Positive racism does not lead to negative racism, see how they react to white kids being told the achievements of the white race, in those terms, as black kids are told the achievements of the black race. You'll find them screaming their objections pretty quickly. |
| Posted by: Ptah 2010-07-20 15:29 |
| #12 Just sit back and let them do all the talking. |
| Posted by: bigjim-CA 2010-07-20 14:56 |
| #11 Look, the only way any rabble rouser in any culture at any point in history can be successful is to be perceived as infallable. Shabazz is no different, if not AAA league and unimaginative. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2010-07-20 11:53 |
| #10 Personally, I am prejudiced against all assholes, regardless of skin color. |
| Posted by: Goober Goobelopolous 2010-07-20 10:57 |
| #9 Shabazz is a hate-filled grievance-mongering racist shitbucket. |
| Posted by: No I am The Other Beldar 2010-07-20 10:53 |
| #8 What do you call it when blacks judge all whites by the color of their skin? Revealing Racist Hypocritical Revenge |
| Posted by: gorb 2010-07-20 10:32 |
| #7 1. Only white people can be racists. 2. All white people are racists. |
| Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2010-07-20 09:57 |
| #6 Social Justice 101 as taught on America's campuses |
| Posted by: Frank G 2010-07-20 07:53 |
| #5 And by the way, Malik, my wife lost a job she'd been doing for two years to a person who had never done it before, but happened to have the preferred skin tone. Whaddaya call that? |
| Posted by: Bobby 2010-07-20 05:57 |
| #4 OK, if it makes you feel better, I'll concede your definition for the Eubonics-speakers. What do you call it when blacks judge all whites by the color of their skin? Anti-white retribution? It's gotta have a name. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2010-07-20 05:55 |
| #3 If Malik Shabazz's slave master whips Shabazz, then by all means, he has right to take it from him and whip back. Was not aware there are slave masters, I thought slavery was abolished 150 years ago. Reverse racism? No such a thing. Racism plain and simple. |
| Posted by: twobyfour 2010-07-20 02:55 |
| #2 This is part and parcel of the Newspeak definition of "racism" which can only refer to anti-black bigotry. Also: anti-black or hispanic discrimination = bad anti-white, indian, or oriental discrimination = good Because, you know, South and East Asians value education and excel in business even though they are immigrant outsiders. There MUST be something unfair about that! In Obamaland it's all about results now, not opportunity. |
| Posted by: Scooter McGruder 2010-07-20 00:31 |
| #1 Versus BHARAT RAKSHAK > KAGAN SCOTUS CONFIRMATION HERALDS DECLINE OF ANGLO-SAXON, WASP DOMINATION. Six SCOTUS Judges will be Roman Catholic + Panel per se will become more highly diverse as to [Mixed]Race-Ethnicity + Gender. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2010-07-20 00:21 |