Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
Congressman Says He Didn't Know Black Panther Case Because Media Didn't Cover It |
2010-07-15 |
![]() Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., in a written statement released late Tuesday, accused Fox News of launching "attacks on me" for showing video of the meeting. He said he would soon send a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder regarding the incident and "the importance of allegations of voter intimidation," but said the "major sources of information which I rely upon most" did not mention the issue. Sherman listed the Los Angeles Times, the Los Angeles Daily News, the Economist, Newsweek, Congressional Quarterly and National Journal and said he only found one mention of the Black Panther case. "While it is possible that our review missed something, it can be said that less than one page per 50,000 from the above sources deals with the issue," Sherman said. "In contrast, Fox News covered the issue repeatedly." The nearly two-year-old case resurfaced this month when J. Christian Adams, who recently quit the Justice Department, lobbed accusations at his former superiors of instructing attorneys in the civil rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white victims. Adams' allegations have led the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which is investigating the Justice Department's handling of the case, to plan a new round of subpoenas and call for a separate federal probe. The remarkable scene at the town hall meeting on Sunday Sherman was captured on video and posted on YouTube. When asked by a constituent for reaction to explosive allegations by an ex- Justice Department official that the Obama administration abandoned the New Black Panther case for racial reasons and is not pursuing voter violation cases involving white victims and black defendants, Sherman disputed the charge. "I am extremely sure that we do not have a policy at the Department of Justice of never prosecuting a black defendant when the victim is white," he said, drawing shouts of "Yes, you do!" "I'm sure it may say that somewhere on the Internet but that doesn't mean it's true," he said, drawing more jeers. "As to the Black Panther Party, I'm simply not aware of that case," he said, drawing a sustained cry of hissing, boos and outrage. One constituent can be heard saying, "Just for that answer, I'm not voting for you." |
Posted by:Fred |
#12 Congressman Sherman has no staff? Even if he missed any of the discussion in the media, his staff should have given him summary of all pertinent news. He could fire his staff, cancel his Times subscription, and google rantburg.com. He would find himself much better informed. |
Posted by: Skunky Glins**** 2010-07-15 21:50 |
#11 "In contrast, Fox News covered the issue repeatedly." Meybe that's a clue about which news sources can be trusted to bring you the actual news, you idiot. You need to get out of your DC bubble more often. |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2010-07-15 21:29 |
#10 '...when someone asked if she had heard the latest about Acorn,(she responded) âI had to answer ânoâ because I get all my news from The New York Times.â' Source |
Posted by: Clanter Sproing5873 2010-07-15 17:11 |
#9 Exactly, Ebbang. I rarely watch TV news or read a newspaper. Rantburg and other internet sites are my news sources. Yet I am sure that I am better informed on national and international news than I used to be. I mean, where else ca you read about nuggets from the Urdu press, or the shutter guns from the RAB. |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2010-07-15 14:34 |
#8 Somebody should tell the congressman about Rantburg. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2010-07-15 11:54 |
#7 or there is the other reason--just downright stupidity! |
Posted by: JohnQC 2010-07-15 10:33 |
#6 There are many donk politicians and some diehard donk voters who refuse to watch Fox News--something about plausible denial, the ostrich syndrome or refusal to hear the truth. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2010-07-15 10:32 |
#5 In that case Steve he's a pathetic stupid sack of ... Of course anyone who lists NewsWeak as their news source has other problems as well. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2010-07-15 09:57 |
#4 Lying sack he may be, but I agree with Big Jim: if I didn't check the blogs, Fox and other new media, I wouldn't have known about it either. I'll bet Sherman's staff doesn't research outside of approved sources. |
Posted by: Steve White 2010-07-15 09:26 |
#3 Sherman's a lying sack |
Posted by: Frank G 2010-07-15 08:29 |
#2 Don't pathological liars actually believe what they're saying? |
Posted by: Bobby 2010-07-15 05:59 |
#1 I actually believe this guy. You'd never know if you depended on MSM for your news. |
Posted by: bigjim-CA 2010-07-15 04:31 |