You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
The One's Worst Foreign Policy Mistake?
2010-07-06
Is that a multiple choice question?
Given President Obama's glaring domestic policy missteps, it is understandable that the public has largely been blinded to his foreign policy failings. In fact, these may have been even more damaging to America's future.
Honduras, Israel,North Korea, etc.
The president's New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New-START) with Russia could be his worst foreign policy mistake yet.

New-START impedes missile defense, our protection from nuclear-proliferating rogue states such as Iran and North Korea. Its preamble links strategic defense with strategic arsenal. It explicitly forbids the United States from converting intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) silos into missile defense sites. The treaty fails to apply the MIRV limits that were part of the prior START treaty. Again, it may not be coincidental that Russia is developing a new heavy-load - meaning MIRV-capable - ICBM.

The treaty ignores tactical nuclear weapons, where Russia outnumbers us by as much as 10 to 1. Obama heralds a reduction in strategic weapons from approximately 2,200 to 1,550 but fails to mention that Russia will retain more than 10,000 nuclear warheads that are categorized as tactical because they are mounted on missiles that cannot reach the United States. But surely they can reach our allies, nations that depend on us for a nuclear umbrella. And who can know how those tactical nuclear warheads might be reconfigured? Astonishingly, while excusing tactical nukes from the treaty, the Obama administration bows to Russia's insistence that conventional weapons mounted on ICBMs are counted under the treaty's warhead and launcher limits.

By all indications, the Obama administration has been badly out-negotiated. Perhaps the president's eagerness for global disarmament led his team to accede to Russia's demands, or perhaps it led to a document that was less than carefully drafted.
Don't be so naive, Mitt. It's part of The One's legacy.
Whatever the reason for the treaty's failings, it must not be ratified: The security of the United States is at stake. The only responsible course is for the Senate to demand and scrutinize the full diplomatic record underlying the treaty. Then it must insist that any linkage between the treaty and our missile defense system be eliminated. In a world where nuclear weapons are proliferating, America's missile defense shield must not be compromised.
Posted by:Clinegum Shineng9514

#7  The people need to make him resign. He would never. This is a shameless guy. After all, he accepted a NOBEL. He has no shame, and no limits.
Posted by: Ford Maude Elle   2010-07-06 14:24  

#6  Resign, Obama, resign, before you get us killed.
Posted by: whatadeal   2010-07-06 14:19  

#5  It's a feature, not a bug.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2010-07-06 13:38  

#4  As I have said many times: Whose side is Obama on? Posted by ed

Definately not ours.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-07-06 11:43  

#3  I'm glad somebody in a leadership position is realizing just how badly Obama and his Merry Marxists have screwed over the United States with is lopsided nuclear treaty.

As I have said many times: Whose side is Obama on?
Posted by: ed   2010-07-06 09:53  

#2  Mitt Romney writing an op ed about foreign policy in the WaPo.

hmmm.

The WaPo may be close to having enough Obama.

Posted by: lord garth   2010-07-06 09:22  

#1  It would be one thing if Barry's bumbling were part of some coherent Russia-friendly strategy-- say, a long-term effort to play the "Russia card" against a predatory and surging China and the jihadists on Russia's southern flank.

But Barry doesn't care about grand strategy, or even foreign policy on a small scale. Foreign policy, history of interstate relations or the internal development of Turkey or Russia or Japan or China: these are all distractions from Barry's greater mission to bring social democracy to the US.

Time for the US to get smart about Russia and strike a bargain that will enable us to swap out Turkey and bring Russia into NATO. That's not the same as a badly-written missile deal. But it may involve sharing our defense missile technology in exchange for a jointly-operated base in, say, Azerbaijan, on Iran's doorstep.
Posted by: lex   2010-07-06 08:25  

00:00