| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Michigan Considers Law to License Journalists |
| 2010-05-29 |
| A Michigan lawmaker wants to license reporters to ensure they're credible and vet them for “good moral character.' Senator Bruce Patterson is introducing legislation that will regulate reporters much like the state does with hairdressers, auto mechanics and plumbers. Patterson, who also practices constitutional law, says that the general public is being overwhelmed by an increasing number of media outlets--traditional, online and citizen generated--and an even greater amount misinformation. “Legitimate media sources are critically important to our government,' he said. He told FoxNews.com that some reporters covering state politics don't know what they're talking about and they're working for publications he's never heard of, so he wants to install a process that'll help him and the general public figure out which reporters to trust. “We have to be able to get good information,' he said. “We have to be able to rely on the source and to understand the credentials of the source.' Critics say the proposed law will stem press freedoms and is bound to be politicized with disgruntles politicians going after reporters who don't paint them in a positive light. They say that adding members of the so-called fourth estate to the list of government regulated occupations would likely be found unconstitutional. “It's misguided and it's never going to fly,' said Kelly McBride, media ethics expert, the Poynter Institute. She is currently involved in a project examining the transformation of the journalism profession. The bill was introduced on May 11 and has been referred to the state legislature's Committee on Economic Development and Regulatory Reform. “It's a single sponsor bill. I think that says it all' said Mike MacLaren, executive director of the Michigan Press Association. “I've not talked to the senator about this but whenever you see a single sponsor it's usually indicative of what others think of it, which is not much.' According to the bill, reporters must provide the licensing board proof of: --"Good moral character' and demonstrate they have industry “ethics standards acceptable to the board.' --Possession of a degree in journalism or other degree substantially equivalent. --Not less than 3 years experience as a reporter or any other relevant background information. --Awards or recognition related to being a reporter. --Three or more writing samples. Reporters will also have to pay an application and registration fee. The bill does not prevent reporters who are not licensed by the state from covering Michigan politics, and registering with the state would be voluntary. Patterson conceded that he didn't actually think his bill would be enacted into law. He says he's winding down his two decade political career and wants to provoke public discussion before he leaves office. “I would argue the first amendment feels otherwise,' said MacLaren. “He's entitled to his thoughts. The first amendment protects those as well.' “What's the definition of a reporter? I haven't been able to find out? What's a reporter? What's a journalist?' Patterson said. “I thought you had to have a degree in journalism but apparently not. I could retire and be a journalist.' Patterson said he wants a central place where members of the public can go to find out about reporters' credentials, background and experience. “I'm talking about a central depository for information so someone can go find all that out,' Patterson said, comparing his idea to the vetting process for expert witnesses who testify in court. The senator said that he feels that there's no way to tell who's a legitimate journalist and who's just rewriting other reporters' reporting and twisting facts. “He is right, the problem is “How do I know where I'm getting my news from?'' said McBride, who is working on a Ford Foundation project for the Poynter Institute that address the issue of the growing fifth estate--non professional bloggers, community reporters, and citizen journalists--and the shrinking of the fourth estate, the traditional press. But even though McBride agreed with Patterson's concerns that people don't know which news outlets to trust she said the bill introducing government-licensed reporters is just a bad idea. Plus, she said that governments often try to control journalists through a credentialing process--and that these attempts are usually deemed unconstitutional. “I think that his concern is a legitimate one,' McBride said, “But you're not going to solve the problem by creating some kind of licensing system.' |
| Posted by: Anonymoose |
| #6 I don't think there were were any 'journalist's until someone made up the term to call a 'journalism' school. Before that they were 'reporters' or 'newsmen'. Just another dumb-ass attempt to control the media. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2010-05-29 23:18 |
| #5 I suspect Thomas Paine would have a few choice words. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2010-05-29 22:58 |
| #4 Exactly right, Frank. Graduates of the major communard media mills and ojt programs, like Columbia and Mother Jones respectively, would be automatically vetted and unasailably licensed while upstarts and amateurs; that is, independent media, would be squashed. |
| Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy 2010-05-29 22:00 |
| #3 Here's an idea - how about any legislator who sponsors a law, which is passed and challenged through a final adverse decision by the SCOTUS, which such finding is that the law is unconstitutional, automatically forfeits their seat/instant recall re-election. Unless, such legislature, by 2/3 vote, overrides the automatic forfeiture effect of the SCOTUS, unless the SCOTUS by unanimous 9-0 vote overrides the override. We apparently don't have enough protections from governmental assault and incompetence - time to add more barriers. |
| Posted by: Halliburton - Mysterious Conspiracy Division 2010-05-29 21:15 |
| #2 Dumbass is a Republican. Any idea who this would help, dumbass? Any idea on which side the sanctions, refusal to license, imprisonment for writing without a license would fall? Jeebus. I would just go for libel and slander reform |
| Posted by: Frank G 2010-05-29 18:03 |
| #1 The same problem, irresponsible or criminal journalists abusing their position. The same response, "Critics[who?] say the proposed law will stem press freedoms". |
| Posted by: gromky 2010-05-29 17:56 |