You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Job Offer for Sestak Simmers
2010-05-28
President Obama insisted Thursday there was "nothing improper" about White House contacts with Pennsylvania Rep. Joe Sestak, who has asserted a White House official offered him an administration job if he dropped his primary challenge for Democrat Arlen Specter's Senate seat in Pennsylvania.

"I can assure the public nothing improper took place," Mr. Obama said in his first public comments on the incident, speaking near the end of an hourlong press conference at the White House. Choosing his words carefully, Mr. Obama declined to elaborate on his answer, saying White House lawyers were preparing a fuller response that would be released "shortly, [and] I don't mean weeks or months."

Mr. Sestak, a former Navy admiral, made the assertion about a "high-ranking" job offer at least twice - once to a local cable television interviewer Feb. 18 and again after his primary win on Sunday. He has steadfastly declined to say who approached him and which job was discussed. However, Mr. Sestak has said he would cooperate in any investigation.

California Rep. Darrell Issa, ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said he was not satisfied with the response so far by Mr. Obama and others on the Sestak-Specter affair.

He said the White House needs to answer the question: Was Mr. Sestak offered a job in return for getting out of the race?
Can't the One say, "Not by me, and I will fire anyone who did"? Probably not.
He can't afford to lose Axelrod ...
"Partial answers will only lead to more questions," said Mr. Issa, who has asked the Justice Department to appoint a special prosecutor to the case, a request the department has refused. Republican National Committee Chairman Michael S. Steele echoed Mr. Issa's sentiment. "The silence is rapidly becoming deafening. How many days are needed and how many hours of negotiations between Joe Sestak and the Obama administration are required to simply tell the truth?"

On Wednesday, Pennsylvania Gov. Edward G. Rendell, a Democrat who supported Mr. Specter, said the White House and Mr. Sestak should be as transparent as possible and that trying to "stonewall" will only make the situation "fester" and only add to the pressure to appoint a special prosecutor. "People are going to interpret this worse than it probably is," he told Fox News. "I do not believe that anybody in the White House was crazy enough to say, 'You can have this specific job if you withdraw.' "
On the other hand, no one seems to be able to categorically deny it.
Posted by:Bobby

#4  LOL - Fox sez the WH has acknowledged that Bill Clinton (D-Fount of Truth) was the one that talked to Sestak. He's familiar with crimes and Special Prosecutors. It's not going anywhere. Bill's still a lying tool
Posted by: Frank G   2010-05-28 11:02  

#3  Allrighty then. The WH “statement” will need a couple of key points for their apologetic media to really glom on to. First it will be the offer itself. They may need to seek the advice of Bill Clinton himself on this one. However, this crowd has proven to be quite adept at using the “hypothetical” defense. So it most likely will be the oleÂ’ “just a couple of guys shootinÂ’ da shit” routine. You know, just noodlinÂ’Â…spitballinÂ’Â…talking what ifÂ’s. And for good measureÂ…cÂ’mon this is DCÂ…these kinds of conversations have gone on time and memorial. But the thrust will be the timing. They will say the offer was made before Sestak “officially” announced his bid – no harmÂ…no foul. This will be key for obfuscating all that pesky felony talk. Of course, there will be the obligatory insinuation that the whole thing is nothing more then a partisian witch-hunt concocted to distract from the real issues. It will be interesting to see who takes the proverbial spear to the head on this one. Most likely candidate will be Rham. Hell, if he does run for mayor of Chi-Town he can wear this like a badge of honor.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2010-05-28 09:12  

#2  "Mr. Obama declined to elaborate on his answer, saying White House lawyers were preparing a fuller response that would be released "shortly, [and] I don't mean weeks or months."

translation = We just about have got everybody ready to stick to the same story
Posted by: lord garth   2010-05-28 09:05  

#1  When will we hear from the most ethical, transparent administration in history? Seems that everything about this administration is hysterical historical /sarc.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-05-28 08:27  

00:00