You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Congress Set To Quadruple Crude Oil Tax - 8 cents to 32 cents/bbl
2010-05-25
Responding to the massive BP oil spill, Congress is getting ready to quadruple--to 32 cents a barrel--a tax on oil used to help finance cleanups. The increase would raise nearly $11 billion over the next decade.

The tax is levied on oil produced in the U.S. or imported from foreign countries. The revenue goes to a fund managed by the Coast Guard to help pay to clean up spills in waterways, such as the Gulf of Mexico.

The tax increase is part of a larger bill that has grown into a nearly $200 billion grab bag of unfinished business that lawmakers hope to complete before Memorial Day.
Memorial Day is a week away. Given what they need to achieve in that timeframe, if it passes it's going to be another unread bill. Sixty-three percent of voters want the Healthcare bill repealed, President Obama's latest Rasmussen poll popularity has dropped to 44%, and Democratic candidates have been avoiding the president's help. It's going to be an interesting couple of months.
The key provisions are a one-year extension of about 50 popular tax breaks that expired at the end of last year, and expanded unemployment benefits, including subsidies for health insurance, through the end of the year.
Posted by: Anonymoose

#10  OK, there's 300 million people in the US.

Assuming each person uses 10 gallons of gas a week... and there's been about 18 years since the last spill...

.004*10*52*300,000,000*18 = 11,232,000,000 dollars should be in the fund _right now_. Neglecting gains from interest or losses from inflation.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2010-05-25 22:14  

#9  IF they had been spending the proceeds from this tax on cleanup equipment instead of dumping it into the general fund there'd be plenty of equipment waiting for the next spill (And unless Zero wants to forego Air Farce One and walk everywhere, yes, there's going to be a next spill).
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2010-05-25 15:49  

#8  And, is it not likely that this tax will continue to be raised each time there is a disaster or other 'crisis' (like climate change)?

Well, you know what the man said...Never let a good crisis go to waste.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2010-05-25 15:07  

#7  Now if it were on imported oil only....
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2010-05-25 12:24  

#6  Just another thing to help the economy.
snark
Posted by: newc   2010-05-25 10:59  

#5  "Taxpayers will not pick up the tab," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday.

Dude, it's a tax - they're by definition "taxpayers". Although, admittedly, when hypocritical senators pontificate about "the taxpayers", they don't mean to cite the big companies whose names actually show up on the tax transfer forms. Since libertarian economic theory holds that no corporation pays tax anyways - they just pass the pain on to their customers in the form of higher costs - it's not even true in the sense Reid intends.

Anyways, I am not adamantly opposed to this tax increase, not as much as I am to the government's continued bumbling involvement in the whole process. The tax increase is the cost, the government's radical inefficiency and ineptitude is what is incurring the cost. If we the governed weren't demanding that the government force the oil exploration crews tap offshore oil resources as fucking far from the coasts as possible, those coasts probably wouldn't be threatened by the current oil-spill.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2010-05-25 10:50  

#4  "Taxpayers will not pick up the tab," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday.

Yeah, and there is a tooth fairy too.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-05-25 09:10  

#3  - is it any different than the Social Security Trust Fund?

Heck is it any different than the federal gasoline tax that was suppose to be used for road infrastructure and has since vanished into the great accounting books of the Beltway? /rhet question

Wait till the EPA gets them to tax everyone [with the exception of the 'poor'] for carbon dioxide release.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-05-25 08:29  

#2  Seems an appropriate way to tax the oil business and an appropriate intended use of such tax revenues.
But "Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund has about $1.5 billion available" could be problematic - is it any different than the Social Security Trust Fund? That is, once taxes are collected will they be immediately spent on something else, and IOU's put in the Trust Fund?
And, is it not likely that this tax will continue to be raised each time there is a disaster or other 'crisis' (like climate change)?
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-05-25 07:45  

#1  So this particular tax works out to $0.016 per gallon of refined gasoline, more or less, up from $0.004.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-05-25 07:05  

00:00