| Submit your comments on this article | |
| China-Japan-Koreas | |
| Foreign Ministry US of Linking with S. Korean ship Sinking | |
| 2010-05-23 | |
This betrays the intention of the U.S. to stir up the atmosphere of international pressure upon the DPRK by backing the Lee Myung Bak group of traitors of south Korea, the statement said, and went on: This indicates that the U.S. is invariably pursuing a hostile policy towards the DPRK to isolate and stifle it. As the DPRK had already clarified, it has nothing to do with the case. The DPRK has always abided by international law but the U.S. made such absurd assertion which reminds one of a thief crying "Stop the thief!" The fabrication of the case and the "results of the investigation into it" are, in the final analysis, nothing but a farce orchestrated by the group of traitors with the approval of the U.S. and under its patronage. The U.S. claimed that there was hardly any side which was ready to do so except north Korea and that the cause of the sinking of the warship was most likely a torpedo attack by north Korea even before the announcement of the results of the investigation, paying lip-service to scientific and objective investigation. From the very day the case occurred, the U.S. branded the DPRK as a "suspect" and led the investigation into the case in that direction. Prompted by its miscalculation that the DPRK would yield to its sanctions, the U.S. chose to shun dialogue and negotiations under the signboard of strategic patience. The DPRK and the U.S. were in negotiations over the issue of holding another round of talks in New York in the wake of the Pyongyang bilateral talks held in December of 2009. This was part of the efforts to finally revive the framework of the six-party talks according to the third phase proposal made by China, the host country of the talks. But the Obama administration of the Democratic Party which was defeated by the Republican Party in the by-election to the Senate that took place in January after it was criticized for being weak in the foreign policy again made a switchover to a hard-line policy, totally derailing even the process for the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula by linking the DPRK with the above-said case. It is the intention of the present U.S. administration to suffocate the DPRK politically and economically by internationalizing the sanctions against the latter and use south Korea as a servant for executing its Asian strategy. The U.S., however, should know that it is not so easy to pull the wool over the eyes of the world people. They vividly remember upbeat and "persuasive" U.S. Secretary of State Powell reading top secret information about the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq for 70 minutes at the meeting of the UN Security Council held in February of 2003. It was with such unprecedented lie that the U.S. justified an armed invasion of Iraq and it is still not free from such disgraceful fallout. Should the U.S. tell another lie on the Korean Peninsula and let its running dogs strain the situation, they will have to pay a price incomparably dearer than what the U.S. has done for the Iraqi war. The U.S. and its vassal forces will witness only the reality of prospering socialist Korea quite contrary to what they had dreamed for such a long time. It is the invariable policy of the DPRK to realize the denuclearization of the peninsula and protect the stability and peace of the region but it will not allow any slightest act to infringe upon its sovereignty and right to existence. | |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #7 IOW, as per Soviet-Communist-vs-Chinese- Communist, + USSR-vs-China geopol, STALIN covertly suppor the pre-Pearl Harbor JAPANESE INVASION OF FUTURE COMRADE-IN-MARXISM CHINA, at least as long as Japan's Kwangtung Army stayed inside Chin's borders; + again in 1950 agz the US + MacArthur. NOT FOR COMMOM IDEO, BUT TO KEEP THE USSR NUMERO UNO = SOLE BIG BOSS IN THE GLOBAL COMMIE UNIVERSE. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2010-05-23 23:40 |
| #6 OOOOPSIES, forgot SAME > THE ULTIMATE PURPOSE OF CHINESE MILITARY, POLITICAL, + ADVISORY FORCES IN NORTH KOREA IS TO CONTROL NORTH KOREA'S ARMY + KEEP NORTH KOREA FROM WAGING WAR. and SAME > THE 1950 INVASION OF SOUTH KOREA BY THE NORTH INDIR SAVED TAIWAN FROM BEING INVADED BY MAINLAND CHINA/MAO ZEDONG AFTER THE DEFEAT OF CHIANG KAI-SHEK IN THE POST-1945 CHINESE CIVIL WAR. SUPPORT OF SOVIET LEADER STALIN FOR CHINA'S MASSIVE YALU INTERVENTION [agz MacArthur + UN Command]IN ORDER TO KEEP MAO FROM EXPANDING THE CHIN COMMUNIST REVOLUTION INTO SOVIET CENTRAL ASIA-FAR EAST WHILE THE USSR WAS STILL RECOVERING FROM WW2. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2010-05-23 23:31 |
| #5 TOPIX > US, CHINA AT ODDS [National, Mil? response]OVER CHEONAN REPORT [by SoKor], + SOUTH KOREA TO TAKE CHEONAN INCIDENT TO UN. * WMF > US-WORLD HAS REACHED A DECISIVE POINT ON THE IRAN, NORTH KOREA NUCLEAR ISSUE. IRAN'S NUCLEAR FUEL EXCHANGE DEAL WID TURKEY, BRAZIL + DPRK'S NUCLEAR FUSION CLAIMS WILL NOT STOP THEIR DEV OF POTENT NUCLEAR WEAPONS IRREGARDLESS OF US-UN LED SANCTIONS. * SAME > US NEEDS A FAKE/FORGED SECOND WAR AGZ NORTH KOREA TO STIMULATE ITS WEAK ECONOMY, + DEFEAT OR DESTROY CHINA'S RISE TO SUPERPOWER. * SAME > PHOTOS OF ROK/SK-ALLEGED NORTH KOREAN TORPEDO THAT SANK THE CHEONAN SHOWS A WEST GERMAN MOTOR, NOT A CHINESE OR NORTH KOREAN-MADE, COPIED MOTOR. * SAME > KOREA WEEK" MEDIA: NO HISTORICAL BASIS EXISTS FOR ANY REGIONAL OR COUNTRY "CHINA THREAT" VEE KOREA(S). KOREAN INSTABILITY AND REGIONAL WARFARE STEMS/OCCURS MORE FROM EXTERNAL OR FOREIGN VENTURES TO ATTACK KOREA OR CHINA, NOT FROM CHINA'S HISTOR INFLUENCE OR DOMINATION OF THE KOREAN PENINSULA. * SAME > JAPAN TBS TV MEDIA: EXTRAPOLATED TOKYO CENSUS INDICATES THAT THE NUMBER OF CHINESE PERSONS LIVING IN TOKYO IS NOW 16.0MILYUHN, UP FROM 8.5MILYUHN BACK IN YEAR 2000. AT CURRENT GROWTH RATES, THE NUMBER OF CHINESE IN TOKYO WILL EXCEED 20.0MILYUHN BY 2015. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2010-05-23 22:46 |
| #4 Won't be long and Zero will apologize to the dear leader and the world for the boat being in the way of his torpedo, after all the boat could have steared away, and offer him an aliance in the new world order. |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2010-05-23 13:47 |
| #3 Less filling. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2010-05-23 12:31 |
| #2 Needs more Juche. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2010-05-23 10:02 |
| #1 2010-2012 > NOT UNSC or International Sanctions, but how POTUS BAMMER responds, espec Militarily, to Pyongyang admitting it was a deliberate + unilateral NK attack agz SK. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2010-05-23 01:33 |