Submit your comments on this article | |
International-UN-NGOs | |
Libya Wins Seat on UN Human Rights Council | |
2010-05-16 | |
![]()
Anne Bayefsky, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and Touro College feels that the U.S. could have done a lot more to stop Libya and other human rights abusers from getting on the council. She says "at the very least they could have spoken out against it as bringing the Council into serious disrepute. Bayefsky says "the President is invested on propping up the U.N. as a serious place to protect rights and deal with Iran. The fiction suits his foreign policy so he decided the U.S. should join the Council last year and make U.S. taxpayers pay for it - regardless of the fact that its main priority is to demonize Israel and keep the spotlight off abominations around the world." Meanwhile Libya's ambassador to the U.N. raced by the media stakeout position without taking questions on what his country would do as a new council member. Calls to the Libyan Ambassador were not returned. According to Freedom House, an independent watchdog organization that "supports democratic change, monitors the status of freedom around the world, and advocates for democracy and human rights" only five of the fourteen countries that were up for the vote today are considered "qualified" the other countries are categorized as either "not qualified" or "questionable" for their human rights and freedom records. Former U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan created the Human Rights Council in 2006 to replace the discredited U.N. Human Rights Commission which he said had a "credibility deficit." But according to a press release from UN Watch , a Geneva based non-government organization, "The Geneva-based council gives dominance to Africa and Asia, whose 26 seats grant them an automatic majority. Western Europe and North America together are represented by seven countries. The UN Watch press release says "to date, the council has adopted 40 censure resolutions, of which 33 have targeted Israel. The only other governments to be criticized were Burma, Guinea, Honduras, North Korea and Sudan. Out of nine emergency sessions that criticized countries, six were against Israel." The other countries elected to serve on the Human Rights Council are Angola, Mauritania, Qatar, Malaysia, Uganda, Thailand, Ecuador, Moldova, Spain, Switzerland, Poland, Maldives and Guatemala. | |
Posted by:Steve White |
#6 These days, if it weren't for BS, there would be nothing left. |
Posted by: Jefferson 2010-05-16 22:41 |
#5 Noone should be surprised at this. |
Posted by: Rex Mundi 2010-05-16 20:27 |
#4 If we had the slightest amount of common sense, we'd tell the UN to take a hike. Problem here is we CREATED the UN. It's kinda like the police chief discovers that his No 1 son is a thief, How to arrest him an still not lose so much Face you lose both your job, income and home as well? |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2010-05-16 17:56 |
#3 Gee, the Nazis should have just waited just a few years for the creation of the UN and they too could have been part of this grand charade. I suppose the criteria is merely to have a country, and if it's a dictatorship, all the better. |
Posted by: HammerHead 2010-05-16 09:26 |
#2 Tranzi jackasses like Barry Soetoro and that entire WH gang see nothing wrong, I'm sure they think we're all morally equal. |
Posted by: NCMike 2010-05-16 08:58 |
#1 If we had the slightest amount of common sense, we'd tell the UN to take a hike. |
Posted by: DMFD 2010-05-16 00:15 |