You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Jewish group 'shocked' by UK ban of travel ad
2010-04-23
B'nai B'rith International says it is outraged at a United Kingdom advertising board decision to ban an Israeli government tourism ad promoting Israel and calls on the Advertising Standards Authority, an independent government body, to reverse its own decision.

"Displaying a shocking lack of judgment, the British Advertising Standards Authority deemed the print ads misleading because the site they promote, the Western Wall, also known as the Kotel, is in the eastern part of Jerusalem, which the advertising board said was actually 'occupied' and not part of Israel," the Jewish group said.

According to B'nai B'rith, "The Western Wall is the holiest site in Judaism. To suggest it is not part of Israel is as wrong-headed as it is dangerous to the well-being of the Jewish state. No peace agreement will ever take this area from Israel. But the ban could lead some to believe this cornerstone of Judaism and Jewish history is in dispute and could in turn prejudice future negotiations."

"This is one of the most egregious interpretations of Israel's borders that I've seen in a long time," says B'nai B'rith International President Dennis W. Glick. "Jerusalem is mentioned hundreds of times in the bible. For the British Advertising Standards Authority to suggest the area is not part of Israel is an exceptional misuse of office. No peace plan would ever ask Israel to hand over the Wall. It dismisses the symbolic and historic value to the Jewish people and the Jewish state."

"The advertising board is trampling on reality," says B'nai B'rith International Executive Vice President Daniel S. Mariaschin. "No peace agreement would ever exist that would remove the Western Wall from Israeli control. This decision will only serve to further delegitimize Israel."
Yes, one expects that was the intent.
Posted by:lotp

#6  Brig. Zia Ul Haq, later Pakistani Army Chief and President/Dictator of Pakistan led the Jordanian 2nd division during its anti-PLO operations.
Posted by: john frum   2010-04-23 16:54  

#5  I recall that Jordan's King Hussein drove the PLO out of Jordon in 1970 because they were a threat to Jordon. As a group they are troublemakers not peacemakers. What Ralphs son Johnnie said.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-04-23 10:34  

#4  Nah, England doesn't have a Muslim problem. What would make you think that?
Posted by: gorb   2010-04-23 09:49  

#3  The advertising board is trampling on reality

Isn't it a definition of EU & Transnational progressivism?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-04-23 06:18  

#2  JM, Why can't the West Bank and Gaza Salamists just go ahead and declare themselves a state? They could then go back to decapitating each other and no one would complain.
Posted by: Ralphs son Johnnie   2010-04-23 04:35  

#1  ION ISRAEL NN> PA ARABS TO ISRAEL: WE'LL TAKE YOUR STATE PLEASE!PA Muslims are increasingly rejecting the concept of a 2-State solution in favor a "One State, Two Peoples" BINATIONAL STATE SOLUTION WHERE JEWS + MUSLIMS JOINTLY RULE.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-04-23 01:09  

00:00