Submit your comments on this article | |
Home Front: Politix | |
Dirty Money Watch: Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Pa. | |
2010-04-08 | |
![]() WHAT: Sestak received $10,000 from Rep. Charles Rangel's National Leadership PAC, the political action committee of the powerful New York Democrat who was chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee that writes tax law. WHY IT'S DIRTY: Rangel is being investigated on multiple issues by the House ethics committee, including failure to report income from properties he owns in New York and the Dominican Republic. A company that gave $1 million to a New York school facility that will bear Rangel's name subsequently received lucrative tax breaks, and he has reportedly solicited political contributions on official stationery. Rangel has been admonished by the House ethics committee and forced to give up his Ways and Means Committee chairmanship. WILL SESTAK GIVE IT BACK? Sestak's communications director told the Examiner that Sestak had not returned the money and was waiting to find out the results of the ethics investigation. THE SCORE: Number of Democrats who have given it back: 19 Number of Republicans who have given it back: 0 Number of Publicans who got any? DONATED THIS OR OTHER DIRTY MONEY WATCH-HIGHLIGHTED CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITY: Rep. Steve Israel, D-N.Y., Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, Rep. Allyson Schwartz, D-Pa., Rep. Ed Perlmutter, D-Colo., Rep. David Price, D-N.C., Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., Rep. Bill Foster, D-Ill., Rep. Jerry McNerney, D-Calif., Rep. Gary Peters, D-Mich., Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., Rep. Debbie Halvorson, D-Ill., Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy, D-Ohio, Rep. Larry Kissell, D-N.C., Rep. Suzanne Kosmas, D-Fla., Rep. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., Rep. Harry Mitchell, D-Ariz., Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minn., Rep. John Hall, D-N.Y.
| |
Posted by:Fred |
#1 Want to help the deficit [sarcastically speaking], make all such national oriented election and reelection funds dump all holdings into the Treasury 90 days after the election. Consider it the Incumbent Revenue Relief Act. They can start at the same 'social justice' level of equality for their future opponents from that date on. It's all about being 'fair', right? /rhet question. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-04-08 08:29 |