You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Obama: Jimmy Carter 2.0
2010-04-07
Tunku Varadarajan, Daily Beast

...In terms of foreign policy—or, better put, foreign clout—the U.S. is going through a startling period of auto-emasculation. Barack Obama has discarded his predecessor's big stick—the wielding of which should have confirmed the flaws not of big sticks but of his predecessor—and replaced it with a mission of almost messianic outreach to our foes and most adamant competitors (while, at the same time, snubbing allies like Britain, Israel and India; Robert Kagan has a doughty essay on this in The Washington Post.)

Observing Obama's foreign policy, one comes away with the impression that he is profoundly embarrassed by American exceptionalism: We are a country like any other, and let no one tell us otherwise. He also views America's international decline as irreversible: His instinctive response is to accommodate the U.S. to the forces that have led to this decline, since to resist them would not merely be futile, but an affront to the multi-polar sensibilities of all those who, in foreign chanceries and international institutions, watch America closely for any trace of unilateralist recidivism. (Of course, it is OK to be unilateralist in the formal renunciation of strategic options, as happens with any nuclear self-denial; otherwise, multinational solidarity is always to be preferred, even when it leads to the backing of anti-American forces, as has happened in Honduras.)

In the Obama narrative, America has been a reckless source of trouble for the world because of its arrogant interventionism. Obama's solution, in the words of Charles Hill, a professor at Yale, is the following: “Close out the wars, disengage, and distance ourselves in order to carry out the real objective: the achievement of a European-style welfare state. Just as Reagan downsized government by starving it through budget cuts, Obama will downsize the military-industrial complex by directing so much money into health care, environ-o-care, etc., that we, like the Europeans, will have no funds available to maintain world power. This will gain the confidence of those regimes adversarial to us as they recognize we will no longer be a threat to them and that we will acquiesce in their maintenance of power over their people.' All will be well with the world....
Posted by:Mike

#11  When Carter was elected I was horrified. A 'liberal' in the White House. What would happen to the country?

Well, the country held steady and strong so I figured that no 'liberal' could not really harm the country because it was too set in its ways.

Boy was I wrong.
Posted by: Kelly   2010-04-07 20:41  

#10  VARIOUS NET > wehell, seems for some Netters POTUS BAMMER is not just Jimbo II but worse a NELVILLE "PEACE IN OUR TIME/I HAVE A PAPER HERE SIGNED BY MR. HITLER PROMISING PEACE" CHAMBERLAIN???

Ouchies.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-04-07 19:30  

#9  I hereby apologize to Jimmah for ever saying he was the worst president in my lifetime. The Precedent has already got him beat and he's not halfway through his term.
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2010-04-07 17:25  

#8  Carter reacts angrily to a comparison of Obama to him - story here
Posted by: lex   2010-04-07 16:05  

#7  Funny, even Jimmah felt offended recently when someone compared Obamao to him.
Posted by: twobyfour   2010-04-07 15:22  

#6  I detest Jimmahs antisemetic stance but his Habitat for Humanity is a great organization.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2010-04-07 12:12  

#5  Carter served his country as a Naval submarine officer (nuclear engineer). He was a farmer, producing food that people ate.

Obama has done what? Community Organizer?
Posted by: john frum   2010-04-07 12:03  

#4  Obama has seized the "worst president evah" title from Jimmy. In fact, he is starting to make Carter look good.
Posted by: DarthVader   2010-04-07 11:43  

#3  This administration is far worse than Carter's. Carter had some restraints on him by his own Democrats as well as Republicans. Today, the donks have bought the whole leftard deal.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-04-07 10:41  

#2  1998 technology taken report institute [url=http://www.lbl.gov]article studies 1800s beta[/url] http://www.upi.com
Posted by: maconyang   2010-04-07 08:38  

#1  To be replaced by Classic Carter, no doubt.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-04-07 08:35  

00:00