You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
NYT(!): Who are those Tea Partiers anyway?
2010-03-28
The venerable New York Times decides to look into those teabagging loonies, discovers the leaders are unemployed members of the middle class, who found something more important than job-hunting. The journalist's confusion is palpable: the people she interviewed are all benefitting from Social Security and other government programs, so how can it be they are working to force the government to give them less? This is the same confusion the New York Times has felt in the past, when Americans have voted in large numbers for Republican candidates, clearly against what the NYT feels to be their best interests,
When Tom Grimes lost his job as a financial consultant 15 months ago, he called his congressman, a Democrat, for help getting government health care.

Then he found a new full-time occupation: Tea Party activist.In the last year, he has organized a local group and a statewide coalition, and even started a "bus czar" Web site to marshal protesters to Washington on short notice. This month, he mobilized 200 other Tea Party activists to go to the local office of the same congressman to protest what he sees as the government's takeover of health care.

He and others do not see any contradictions in their arguments for smaller government even as they argue that it should do more to prevent job loss or cuts to Medicare. After a year of angry debate, emotion outweighs fact.
Mr. Grimes is one of many Tea Party members jolted into action by economic distress. At rallies, gatherings and training sessions in recent months, activists often tell a similar story in interviews: they had lost their jobs, or perhaps watched their homes plummet in value, and they found common cause in the Tea Party's fight for lower taxes and smaller government.

The Great Depression, too, mobilized many middle-class people who had fallen on hard times. Though, as Michael Kazin, the author of "The Populist Persuasion," notes, they tended to push for more government involvement. The Tea Party vehemently wants less -- though a number of its members acknowledge that they are relying on government programs for help.

Mr. Grimes, who receives Social Security, has filled the back seat of his Mercury Grand Marquis with the literature of the movement, including Glenn Beck's "Arguing With Idiots" and Frederic Bastiat's "The Law," which denounces public benefits as "false philanthropy."

"If you quit giving people that stuff, they would figure out how to do it on their own," Mr. Grimes said.
Posted by:trailing wife

#6  Weird that the NYT never speculates that "peace" marchers will get over it when the pot wears off.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2010-03-28 17:15  

#5  Why any Tea Party activist - or any other conservative or Republican, for that matter - would ever talk to a NYT journoturd is beyond me. Everyone on our side needs to realize that when they see a "reporter", the chances are 99% that they're looking at a paid operative of the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo)   2010-03-28 15:56  

#4  Mr. Grimes is one of many Tea Party members jolted into action by economic distress.

I wonder how many Times grunts signed up when they found out what Pinch and Judy bagged in bonuses?
Posted by: tu3031   2010-03-28 15:50  

#3  .....cause everyone knows recessions are caused by taxes being too low and to little government regulation.

Elite lefty's are all the same, if you don't march to their drummer you're obviously an idiot and not to be taken seriously in any way.
Posted by: Jefferson   2010-03-28 11:36  

#2  They still think of the business cycle as something that Just Happens, and all business downturns are caused by the magic business cycle.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2010-03-28 11:07  

#1  Bone head NYT writer. They are blind. They never consider TeaParty people are treating the cause of the unemployment (over-intrusive over-regualting over-sized government distorting the economy), whiel the NYT only sees not the symptom (businesses hurting and laying people off or failing).

Damned doctrinaire idiots at the NYT cannot see past their collectivist, statist blinders.
Posted by: OldSpook   2010-03-28 10:31  

00:00