You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Democratic Senator: Health Care Law to Address 'Mal-Distribution of Income'
2010-03-28
As Democrats tout the moral underpinnings of the federal health care system overhaul -- ensuring health care coverage for nearly all Americans -- one senator appeared to go off message when he said the legislation would address the "mal-distribution of income in America."

After the Senate passed a "fix-it" bill Thursday to make changes to the new health care law, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairman of the influential Finance Committee, said the overhaul was an "income shift" to help the poor.

"Too often, much of late, the last couple three years, the mal-distribution of income in American is gone up way too much, the wealthy are getting way, way too wealthy and the middle income class is left behind," he said. "Wages have not kept up with increased income of the highest income in America. This legislation will have the effect of addressing that mal-distribution of income in America."

That contrasted with the arguments Democrats have been making in the past year for reinventing the health care system: to expand health care coverage to 32 million uninsured Americans and tighten regulations on insurance companies while reducing the federal deficit.
Posted by:Fred

#13  #12  Is it O.K. to covet freedom?

Posted by: JohnQC   2010-03-28 14:06

Psalm 33:12 Blessed is the natio...

The reason that America put "In God We Trust" on our currency was to show the world that we do not trust Communism when communism was spreading across the globe.. 
Posted by: Elmaiger Hatfield7630   2010-03-28 14:50  

#12  Is it O.K. to covet freedom?
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-03-28 14:06  

#11  Obama CLAIMS to be Christian so lets see what the Bible says in both the Old Testament and the New Testament

O.T.
Deuteronomy 5:21 . ' You shall not covet your neighbor's wife; and you shall not desire your neighbor's house, his field, his male servant, his female servant, his ox, his donkey, or anything that [is] your neighbor's.'
Micah 2:2 They covet fields and take [them] by violence, Also houses, and seize [them.] So they oppress a man and his house, A man and his inheritance.

N.T.
Acts 20:33 I have coveted no one's silver or gold or apparel.
Posted by: Preacher   2010-03-28 13:49  

#10  There's a reason why rich people have money. And there's also a very related reason why poor people don't.
Posted by: gorb   2010-03-28 13:40  

#9  1.A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.

2.Communism
a.A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
Posted by: wt   2010-03-28 13:23  

#8  communism
Posted by: wt   2010-03-28 13:20  

#7  If you're so worried about the "poor," Baucus (Idiot-Mont.), you redistribute all your goddam money to them.

Keep your greasy thieving fingers off my hard-earned money.

Hopefully, Montana will assure at the next possible opportunity that this clown has to start earning his money, too, instead of sucking at the taxpayers' teat. >:-(
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-03-28 13:00  

#6  Mal-distribution; my arse. So the fact that I worked two jobs most of my adult life means I should re-distribute what I have earned to someone who wants to sit on their a$$ and do nothing? Screw this modern day Nimrod or should I say dipwap who doesn't know shit from shoe polish.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-03-28 10:23  

#5  Let's address the mal-distribution of wealth/value creation. Seems the responsibility in this society and culture is carried by damn few to subsidize a whole lot more of wealth/value consumers.

There have always been poor. There are poor. There will always be poor because they're just not victims as co-conspirators of their own situation. It's call human free will. In every social economic racial group, there are those who will take advantage of opportunity and, unless killed or crippled by their own, can and have advance themselves in standing. There are others who choose not to.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-03-28 08:22  

#4   Hey Alaska Paul the only think that I like of Alaska is that Sarah paulin MILF of your, that I will do so good that I will turn that bitch liberal on a bit
Posted by: republicanisiscrap   2010-03-28 04:22  

#3  one senator appeared to go off message when he said the legislation would address the "mal-distribution of income in America."

Off message? Not from where I sit.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-03-28 02:07  

#2  Was he drunk again?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5Y9X5ggxzA
Posted by: Gomez Threter7450   2010-03-28 00:54  

#1  So lets stick it to the rich and give to the poor.

Then lets stick it to the middle class and give it to the poor.

Then lets stick it to the poor, like the good olde days with the serfs.

Bloody Moroons. What planet did Baucus come from?
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2010-03-28 00:46  

00:00