You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Israel-PA peace talks could begin Sunday
2010-03-04
Indirect talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority may begin as early as Sunday, Haaretz had learned. U.S. Middle East envoy George Mitchell will land in Israel on Saturday night, and the American administration is hoping the sides will declare the beginning of indirect talks the following morning, ahead of the arrival of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden on Monday.

The foreign ministers of the Arab League announced in Cairo Wednesday they were supporting the American initiative for indirect negotiations, qualifying their support with a four-month deadline. They said no progress will be possible without a complete settlement freeze.

The announcement came after heavy American, Egyptian, Jordanian and Saudi pressure was put on the Palestinians and on other members of the League. The pressure also resulted in the Palestinians' withdrawing a much tougher and reserved statement about the negotiations than the one eventually released. The Arab League decision was not unanimous and was strongly contested by Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Moallem, who went as far as to interrupt when Amr Moussa, the secretary general of the Arab League, was reading out the statement, to say the decision on entering negotiations rested ultimately with the PA.

The foreign ministers set a four-month deadline for the first phase of indirect negotiations after which the Arab League will assess the progress of the talks and decide whether to offer further support.

The foreign ministers said their decision was a last effort to promote peace through negotiations and was meant to allow the American administration an opportunity to facilitate the process. "Despite the lack of conviction in the seriousness of the Israeli side, the committee sees that it would give the indirect talks the chance as a last attempt and to facilitate the U.S. role," the statement read.

Moussa stressed that even indirect negotiations are doomed to failure if Israeli measures such as settlement construction continue. He warned that if indirect talks fail to yield results, the Arabs will call for an emergency United Nations Security Council meeting to address the Arab-Israeli conflict and would ask Washington not to use its veto.

The Americans proposed the indirect talks as a way to allow the process to move forward without PA President Mahmoud Abbas' losing face by being seen as giving up on his demand for a complete settlement freeze. Abbas had also sought the Arab League's support to preempt Palestinian criticism of the move.

Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh said Wednesday in Gaza that he calls on the Arab League to review its decision.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu commented Wednesday in a Knesset speech that "it seems the conditions for proximity talks are ripening." He said: "All said and done, the world understands that this government is striving for negotiations. It has made some difficult steps to further these negotiations. It said things and did things," he said.

The prime minister also slammed the Palestinians for refusing "without justification and no reason whatsoever to reenter negotiations."

Netanyahu said: "I've said before that although you normally need two to tango, in this case you might need three. These negotiations may require some going back and forth, but Israel is not and never was an obstacle to negotiations."

American Vice President Joe Biden is expected to arrive here on Monday, and the American administration is keen to have the announcement of indirect negotiations before he lands, so he can congratulate the sides and present the talks as an American achievement.

Special envoy Mitchell will mediate the talks, which will be the first formal negotiations after a 15-month hiatus, since before Netanyahu took office. These will also be the first Israeli-Palestinian negotiations to take place under the Obama administration.

Negotiations have been at a standstill as Abbas refused to enter talks so long as any construction takes place in any settlement, including East Jerusalem.

At this stage, negotiations will focus on border issues, with the hope that if these can be resolved, the issue of settlement construction will be next on the agenda, followed by the core issues of the status of Jerusalem and the Palestinian refugees.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Are you sure JFM is Jewish, g(r)omgoru?

Gentlemen, I repeat my question from yesterday: is this really necessary? We are all on the same side of the war on jihad, and can disagree on some minor details without disagreeing on the critical point. As it was also during World War II, where some Jews saw the British refusal to allow Jews to emigrate to Palestine as participation, however unintended, in the German genocide... and it must be remembered there was a strong antisemitic streak in the British government, then and since -- so the conclusion was not necessarily that far off about the Foreign Department which ran the Palestinian Mandate, at least.

Most certainly their souls were not pure as the driven snow. Even after the war the British government as one of the Four Powers controlling conquered Germany, put Jews in refugee camps surrounded by barbed wire, and incarcerated those who attempted to sneak into the Palestinian Mandate on Cyprus, again behind barbed wire. Surely all here have seen the film Exodus or read the book! In a similar vein, while my mother and her family were in hiding during the war in Holland, her cousins were incarcerated by the British in Tanganyika (now part of Tanzania). And while the British at the time believed their reasoning to be sound, those at the receiving end did not necessarily agree.
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-03-04 16:59  

#6  Excuse me but who killed Lord Moyne in 1944? A Buddhist Commando?

Posted by: JFM   2010-03-04 16:56  

#5  JFM, you have a little problem with facts. Why don't you read the books I've cited before you open your ignorant yap.

p.s. Itzhak Shamir worth a billion of Europeans of Mosaic Faith like you.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-03-04 14:13  

#4  Menachem Begin was a busy revolutionary terrorist bee too.

Menachem Begin wasn't in Palestine at this time so he is innocent of the crime of fighting the British at a time doing so meant helping the Naizs.
Posted by: JFM   2010-03-04 12:53  

#3  Menachem Begin was a busy revolutionary terrorist bee too.

No matter though. The funhouse of one-way mirrors g(r)im throws stones from is irony proof. (Ow. Gotta go take a pill. Think I gots metaphor overload.)
Posted by: Gabby   2010-03-04 12:23  

#2  Mr Gromgoru

Sine yesterday I didn't see in time your posts about UK and WWII where you played "holier than thou" I will remind you that there were Palestinian Jews who, in 1944 with Auschwitz working at top capacity, instead of say, enlisting in the Allied Armies were launching terrorist attacks on the British thus pinning in the Middle East resources who should have been fighting the Nazis. Furthermore one of those terrorists, a such Itzhak Shamir, instead of being ostracized as a traitor ended becoming Prime Minister of Israel
Posted by: JFM   2010-03-04 08:45  

#1  So could calculus lessons to cats.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-03-04 08:04  

00:00