You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
WEATHER: HOTTEST JANUARY EVER SAY CLIMATE EXPERTS
2010-02-26
Hey, don't laugh! This is sewious!
CLIMATE scientists yesterday stunned Britons suffering the coldest winter for 30 years by claiming last month was the ­hottest January the world has ever seen.

The remarkable claim, based on global satellite data, follows Arctic temperatures that brought snow, ice and travel chaos to millions in the UK.

At the height of the big freeze, the entire country was blanketed in snow. But Australian weather expert Professor Neville Nicholls, of Monash University in Melbourne, said yesterday: "January, according to satellite data, was the hottest January we've ever seen.

"Last November was the hottest November we've ever seen. November-January as a whole is the hottest November-January the world has seen." Veteran ­climatologist Professor Nicholls was speaking at an online climate change briefing, added: "It's not warming the same everywhere but it is really quite challenging to find places that haven't warmed in the past 50 years."

His extraordinary claims came after the World Meteorological Organisation revealed 2000 to 2009 was the hottest decade since records began in 1850.

But UK forecaster Jonathan Powell, of Positive Weather Solutions, said: "If it is the case and it is borne out that January was the hottest on record, it is still no marker towards climate change. "It's all part of a cyclical issue and nothing should be read too deeply into that.

"It's been the coldest for 30 years in Britain but we predicted that and climate change always tends t o throw up anomalies. It's all in line with predictions and I won't be sold on climate change at all. The data is either faulty or manufactured to make it look like it shouldn't."

The Met Office yesterday revealed it would re-examine 150 years of world temperature records to restore faith in its data in the wake of a number of high-profile blunders dubbed "climategate". Scientists advancing claims of man-made climate change were humiliated when emails emerged suggesting researchers at the University of East Anglia had been selective with weather data. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change also wrongly claimed the Himalayan glaciers could melt away in 25 years. Most scientists have said it will take 300 years for the glaciers to disappear.

Following the embarrassing revelations, the Daily Express published a dossier of 100 reasons why the rise in world temperatures is natural and not caused by man. The report, by the European Foundation, dismissed suggestions that raised levels of carbon dioxide would bring difficulties, saying it would encourage crop yields and support food production.

Now the Met Office has pledged to go back as far as 1850 to check its statistics.

Yesterday the IPCC and the University of East Anglia were also preparing to defend their research.

Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC, flew to Bali to try to convince the UN to back the troubled organisation. Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband urged Dr Pachauri to make sure no future mistakes were made. He said: "There have been mistakes made, clearly. It's important that those mistakes are looked at.

"I've written to Dr Pachauri to emphasise our support but also our wish that they look at their procedures to try to eliminate these sorts of errors. But the overall picture is very clear, which is that climate change is happening, it is real, it is man-made."

In the Commons, Ann Winterton, Tory MP for Congleton, asked: "Will the Government change its mind about the huge subsidies to land-based wind farms, which are not only ineffective but also despoil the countryside?" Mr Miliband replied bluntly: "No, we won't."

The University of East Anglia submitted its evidence to Parliament's science and technology committee yesterday, denying it had altered climate change statistics. It said evidence that the university's Climate Research Unit had hidden data showing a decline in temperature was "richly misinterpreted and quoted out of context".

But the university said it would review the climate science produced by the unit.
Posted by:gorb

#18  It's also important to note that the thermosphere has drastically reduced in size, for unknown reasons. It is the "big blanket" for both incoming and outgoing radiation, which means hotter highs and colder lows.

Importantly, this is just the opposite of a greenhouse effect.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2010-02-26 20:19  

#17  They were tawkin' about the Southern Hemisphere!

Well the old saying is if you have your ass in the stove and your head in the freezer, on the average, you're comfortable.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-02-26 20:12  

#16  Hardly anything is as clearcut as we are told.

I've thought so since 2nd grade.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-02-26 18:30  

#15  Barb,

The most reliable measure of global temps is satellite measured lower troposhere temps. There are issues with coverage of the polar regions but the rest is measured every couple of days.

I just went to the NOAA website to check the land/sea, northern/southern hemisphere distribution of temps, but they have 'revamped' their website and now its wall to wall GW propaganda. I gave up looking for the actual data.

BTW, here in Western Australia we had an unusually hot summer, supposedly the hottest on record. But hot dry summers are typical of El Nino years. The last really hot summer was 1997, another El Nino year.

El Ninos are periods of accelerated cooling of the Earth's climate, as more heat leaves the oceans into the atmosphere and is then lost to space.

That's the problem with the climate. Hardly anything is as clearcut as we are told.
Posted by: phil_b   2010-02-26 18:20  

#14  I'm curious, Glenmore - how does one go about computing the "average global temperature"? Add the midnight temperature at the top of Mount Everest and a noon temperature in equitorial Africa and divide by 2?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-02-26 17:32  

#13  PSYCH!!!! They were tawkin' about the Southern Hemisphere! You guys are so PWNNED!!!

No really they were tawkin about Not So Great Britain in in the southern hemisphere. Don't you know no mapology? Sheesh!
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839   2010-02-26 16:12  

#12  These guys don't get out much do they? Sitting in front of their computers fabricating data till all hours of the night. It's a tough business.

I think one of them needs to open the black out curtains on the conference room and LOOK OUTSIDE!!!!
Posted by: Karl Rove   2010-02-26 13:22  

#11  Just take off the mask and admit you are bureaucrats and not scientists. How anybody can continue to fund these yahoos is beyond me.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge    2010-02-26 12:53  

#10  I propose that any "climate scientist" who makes these assertions be required to walk around the streets of London completely naked.

Let them put their money where their mouths are.
Posted by: charger   2010-02-26 12:24  

#9  How were global temps recorded in 1850?
Not with a weather satellite
Posted by: bigjim-CA   2010-02-26 11:41  

#8  Just because northern hemisphere cities are colder this winter does not mean the average global temperature is not higher - I have no clue about the temps at sea, or on land in the southern hemisphere, or in the polar regions - or even equatorial lands. Lots colder in 10% of the area vs. just a little warmer in the other 90%??? Global sat measurements might be a good way to evaluate (though over a very short time frame, so far) - but some work needs to be done to restore the scientists' credibility before I will accept their word.
Given that solar climate thought says we SHOULD be cooler right now, a true warming would be a strong indicator of a man-made temperature component. IF the measurements are legit.
Get back to treating the topic as science instead of religion.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-02-26 11:32  

#7  Well it is getting hotter, uncomfortably so, for Global Warming scammers.
Posted by: ed   2010-02-26 11:14  

#6  Who you gonna beleive? Me or your own lying eyes...
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2010-02-26 10:56  

#5  "Don't give me that 'take a look' bushwa! The model said it was hot! So there!"
Posted by: mojo   2010-02-26 10:35  

#4  "There ARE SO unicorns! You just can't see them because you don't BELIEVE! There are elves and magical princesses and fire breathing dragons and other fairy folk!

"And there is no snow, or cold, and it's spring and sunny and the flowers are all in bloom! So pretty! So pretty!"
Posted by: Anonymoose   2010-02-26 09:27  

#3  They don't go outside much, do they.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2010-02-26 07:19  

#2  "Our data may be faulty, but our conclusions are sound."

The latest variation of "Fake, but accurate".
Posted by: Bobby   2010-02-26 05:51  

#1  Double down.

Man has dealt with real climate change for tens of thousands of years. Man is one of the more adaptable creatures. You can find him living on the Artic Circle, on the equator, in the mountains, in the jungles. What you won't find there are cities and their attendant universities and bureaucrats. Then you understand what the basis of the panic is.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-02-26 04:30  

00:00