You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
New poll out of Pennsylvania is cause for major Democratic depression.
2010-02-26
Scott Brown did not win in Massachusetts because Democrat Martha Coakley believed that Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling liked the Yankees. If you want to see the same chilling pattern that elected Brown in erstwhile Democratic Massachusetts, look at the latest Franklin and Marshall poll on Pennsylvania politics. Pennsylvania has voted for a Democratic president since 1992. It has two Democratic senators, a Democratic governor, and its congressional delegation consists of twelve Democrats to seven Republicans. It's a Democratic state.

It's also very typical of the Rust Belt/Midwestern states that Democrats need to win to take national elections. Its electorate is 82 percent white. Three quarters of its citizens did not graduate from college. Among states, it has the fourth highest number of union members. Democrats win elections there when they take close to half of the white vote--Barack Obama got 48 percent in 2008--and well over half of the voters from union households. That hasn't been hard in the last elections, but it has suddenly become very difficult indeed.

According to the Franklin and Marshall poll, which surveyed 1,143 residents of Pennsylvania, former Representative Pat Toomey--a Republican disciple of Steve Forbes and the Club for Growth--leads Democratic Senator Arlen Specter in the senate race by 44 to 34 percent among likely voters. He leads Democratic Representative Joe Sestak by 38 to 20 percent. If you want to get really worried about Democratic prospects, look at the breakdown. Toomey leads Specter among whites by 53 to 24 percent and among voters from union households by 44 to 41 percent. The only groups among whom Specter does well (besides registered Democrats) are non-whites and people with no religious affiliation. He's got that vaunted McGovern coalition wrapped up. Sestak, of course, does even worse, but he is still an unknown quantity in Pennsylvania. Specter and Toomey, who has run before, are well known to Pennsylvania voters.

If you really want to get depressed, look at the findings about the Tea Party movement. Sixty-two percent of Pennsylvanians know something about the Tea Party movement. Of these, 85 percent of Republicans, 58 percent of Independents, and 28 percent of Democrats (!) either strongly or somewhat support the movement. You can say that most voters don't know how wacky some of the Tea Party's ideas are, but what they do know is that it stands in strident opposition to the Obama administration and the status quo in Washington. That should be enough to send shivers through the timbers of Democrats in Washington.
Posted by:Fred

#6  The media has been trying to paint the Tea Partys as racist or wacky and pulling out a handful of examples but it just isn't getting traction. Perhaps if this went down before the media lost all credibility... but not now. Now it just makes people curious about the Tea Partys and they look into things themselves.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2010-02-26 17:18  

#5  You can say that most voters don't know how wacky some of the Tea Party's ideas are, but what they do know is that it stands in strident opposition to the Obama administration and the status quo in Washington."

-yeah, like a return to fiscal responsibility, less spending, less taxes, self reliance and limited government as per the Constitution - what a whacky concept! (sarc/off)
Posted by: Broadhead6   2010-02-26 14:24  

#4  Now the suburbanites are seeing the fruit of their voting and they don't like the taste. Quelle surprise!
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2010-02-26 09:01


Not only suburbanites; but also here in western Pa. I'm seeing some serious buyers remorse among those who voted not so much for Bambi as against Bush. I love asking them how they like the "Hope and Change".
Posted by: WolfDog   2010-02-26 10:58  

#3  Â“You can say that most voters don't know how wacky some of the Tea Party's ideas are, but what they do know is that it stands in strident opposition to the Obama administration and the status quo in Washington.”

Wacky ideas indeedÂ…without those union jobs you know how those bigoted rubes like to cling to their guns and religion.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2010-02-26 10:47  

#2  For electoral purposes, Pennsylvania is made up of four counties, Bucks, Chester, Delaware and Montgomery. These are the Philly suburbs that are in play in every election. Every place else votes the same way every election. Traditionally trunk, they have been trending democrat for some time. When they do not go solidly trunk, the donks can get enough dead people in Philly to swing the election in their favor. Now the suburbanites are seeing the fruit of their voting and they don't like the taste. Quelle surprise!
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-02-26 09:01  

#1   Sixty-two percent of Pennsylvanians know something about the Tea Party movement. Of these, 85 percent of Republicans, 58 percent of Independents, and 28 percent of Democrats (!) either strongly or somewhat support the movement.

The MSM party propaganda machine just isn't what it used to be. Can't make them a non-movement, can't effectively demonize it enough. I suspect the 28 percent of Democrats are legacy hold outs from the now bygone era of liberalism before the socialist cooped the party.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-02-26 04:43  

00:00