Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
CAIR declares Texas plane attack "an act of terror" |
2010-02-20 |
![]() "The position of many individuals and institutions seems to be that no act of violence can be labeled 'terrorism' unless it is carried out by a Muslim," said Nihad Awad, national executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. "The attack on the IRS office in Texas perfectly fits the legal definition of terrorism, yet it is not being labeled as such. This apparent double standard only serves to render the term meaningless." Hours after the attack, Awad labeled it an "act of terror." US officials called it a deliberate assault on a US government institution, stressing there were no apparent connections to international terrorism, although White House spokesman Robert Gibbs did not rule out that it could still be considered an act of domestic terrorism. Austin police chief Art Acevedo said the incident seemed to be "an intentional act by a sole individual." The White House has said it would wait until an investigation into the crash is completed before deciding whether to call it an act of terror, but Texas Congressman Lloyd Doggett, a Democrat, said the incident was a "cowardly act of domestic terrorism." Republican Representative Michael McCaul of Austin, when asked near the crash site if he thought Stack committed a terrorist attack, said "it sounds like it to me." |
Posted by:ryuge |
#10 Nihad Awad No had a wad |
Posted by: Ptah 2010-02-20 22:12 |
#9 Nihad Awad. Does he pronounce his name as "Awad" or a-"WAD" or possibly it was shortened from "Dipwad?" |
Posted by: JohnQC 2010-02-20 19:37 |
#8 CAIR: The experts on terrorism. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2010-02-20 19:34 |
#7 When a jihadi commits terror he always makes sure the populace knows more is coming -- or the group that takes credit and 'claims' him will step in and put out that message. I doubt the populace of Austin (or anywhere else for that matter) woke up this morning 'terrified' because some nutjob flew his plane into a building. So I agree with Tipover ... a whacko with feelings of persecution from just about everyone does not a terrorist make. |
Posted by: Gomez Threter7450 2010-02-20 12:16 |
#6 It was an action undertaken to cause great harm to civilians in an effort to achieve a political aim. Therefore, by definition, it was terrorism. His mental state, race and religion are irrelevant. Slide the masks back up. |
Posted by: AllahHateMe 2010-02-20 08:45 |
#5 No comment from CAIR on Hasan or his act of terroism at Fort Hood? |
Posted by: Besoeker 2010-02-20 04:24 |
#4 "This is defining deviance down so that Jihadis can more easily be characterized as the actions of deranged individuals unrepresentative of Muslims generally." Bingo! |
Posted by: Jinens Lumplump6738 2010-02-20 04:15 |
#3 This is defining deviance down so that Jihadis can more easily be characterized as the actions of deranged individuals unrepresentative of Muslims generally. |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2010-02-20 03:20 |
#2 Snapping under sustained pressure is not terrorism. Psychotic and/or homicidal perhaps but not terror. I suspect he didn't call out Allah Akbar as he hit the building either. |
Posted by: tipover 2010-02-20 02:41 |
#1 If muslims aimed their acts of terror against only IRS offices, we would be in a completely different world situation these days. |
Posted by: crosspatch 2010-02-20 02:23 |