You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
What the capture of Mullah Baradar says about Pakistan's intentions
2010-02-17
Posted by:tipper

#6  The NYTimes says, today, that

"...Pakistan has removed a key Taliban commander, enhanced cooperation with the United States and ensured a place for itself when parties explore a negotiated end to the Afghan war...Pakistan wanted to be included in any attempts to mediate with the Taliban. Even before the arrest of the Taliban commander, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, a senior Pakistani intelligence official expressed irritation that Pakistan had been excluded from what he described as American and Afghan approaches to the Taliban. "

the implication of this and other parts of the article, is that the ISI knew he was in town and knew where he was and decided to grab him as a bargaining chip.
Posted by: lord garth   2010-02-17 14:01  

#5  Or his ISI contact could have told him the Americans are getting on our back bad. We need to bring you in for a couple of weeks of taqiyya after which you can escape and go back on payroll.

Or all of the above.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2010-02-17 10:54  

#4  If I was him , I suspect he may wish he was at Gitmo , that is , if the Paks are half serious and not just playing by numbers (ho-ho)
Posted by: Oscar   2010-02-17 10:45  

#3  One thing we can be certain of, he won't be seen at the GITMO registration desk anytime soon.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-02-17 10:18  

#2  The coming few weeks could be interesting though 49 Pan.. Will get to see which side is buttered and which is not
Posted by: Oscar   2010-02-17 10:14  

#1  I think the guy wanted to negotiate peace and the Taliban gave him up to get rid of him. I also doubt this was some great turning point for the Paks. They are full of crap and they are not on our side...
Posted by: 49 Pan   2010-02-17 10:07  

00:00