You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Palin should cut the hypocrisy
2010-02-12
Racist!
Editor's note: Roland S. Martin, a CNN political analyst, is a nationally syndicated columnist and author of "Listening to the Spirit Within: 50 Perspectives on Faith," and the forthcoming book "The First: President Barack Obama's Road to the White House." He is a commentator for TV One Cable Network and host of a one-hour Sunday morning news show.

(CNN) -- Sarah Palin's most ardent supporters in "real America" love to suggest that those of us who don't buy into her shtick fail to grasp why they love her, citing her realness, plain-spokenness and whatever else they can conjure up.

Folks, nice try, but as a native Texan, I've seen many politicians and wannabes over the years who had charm, wit, charisma and a twinkle in their eye.

Anyone who has listened to the best football coaches the Lone Star State has to offer will tell you that they can persuade a mother and father to send their boy to hell to fetch a glass of ice water and bring him home a better man. They could teach a politician or two how to connect with average Americans.

You want a media darling politician with substance? Try the late Gov. Ann Richards, a woman who could cut you deep and beam ear-to-ear with her motherly smile. But unlike Palin, she had a host of strong ideas in her head that actually made sense and appealed to a cross-section of folks.

Former Rep. Charlie Wilson, who died this week, was a smooth-talking Texan who loved to party hard. But when it came to politics, he knew how to get things done. The media loved him because he could sit with you and enjoy a beer over barbecue, give them a hilarious quote or two, and explain foreign policy better than Henry Kissinger.

Why haven't I cottoned to Palin? Because she portrays herself as a straight-talking politician who wants to lead a movement in the "Lower 48th" -- but is nothing more than a political celebrity willing to cash every check she can grab.

What truly exposed her for me? It was the ridiculous way she reacted in opposing ways last week to two political heavyweights who used the word "retard."
This rant seems a little more deep-rooted than her personal opinion on the use or misuse of the word retard. Retard. Carry on, hypocrite.
When it was reported that President Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, told a group of liberals that they were "f-----g retards" for threatening to run ads against fellow Democrats who weren't jumping on the health care reform bandwagon, Palin demanded his resignation.
She's just giving it back, and hypocrits liberals and their and supporters don't like it. Better to wave your hands and point away from where the real action is if you're a liberal defending another liberal. Like when Reid decided Obama was a good negro, vs. when Lott was joking about the KKK.
As the mother of a child with Down syndrome, Palin has often used her bully pulpit to demand respect for the mentally challenged. Nothing wrong with that. It is an issue that is close to her heart, and she should be a fierce advocate for them.

Yet when one of her biggest supporters, conservative radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, also castigated liberals by calling them "retards," Palin provided him cover, even trying to explain away his comments.

In an interview with Fox News Channel's Chris Wallace, she said Limbaugh was using satire, while Emanuel was blasting those who disagree with him. But anyone who can read or listen could hear Limbaugh calling folks he disagrees with the same. Palin even went further, agreeing with Limbaugh that liberals are "kooks."

So Emanuel and Limbaugh used the word "retard" to describe folks they disagree with, but only Rahm was wrong? Yep, that's how it is in Palin's world. The advocate for the mentally challenged was quick to pounce on someone she disagrees with politically but defended her patron saint, Rush.

Sarah, when you hold yourself up as a fierce protector of the mentally challenged, politics shouldn't enter into the equation. Either you criticize everyone who uses a word that you consider a slur, or you come across as a crass politician who is afraid to offend your chief booster.

Maybe you ought to listen to your spokeswoman, Meghan Stapleton, who thought you cared about the mentally challenged when she sent this e-mail to HotAir.com about Limbaugh's comment: "Gov. Palin believes crude and demeaning name-calling at the expense of others is disrespectful."

But knowing that wouldn't sit well with Rush, you backed off and gave him cover.

If you were true to your cause, you would have demanded an on-air apology from Limbaugh and scolded him for using the word. Instead, you showed your true colors.

Sarah, I haven't bought into your fake "I'm-a-real-American" persona. You slam the president for using teleprompters, but write crib notes on your hand to remember basic beliefs that should be easy to regurgitate.

You decry the "lamestream" media, but you bask in its glory and have joined its payroll as a Fox News contributor, even having the network build a studio in your home. Talk about media elite.

You give a speech riddled with falsehoods about the president and national security, and then try to shrug them off as the "lamestream" media attacking you.

You don't fool me, even as your legion of fans considers you the second coming of President Reagan. You quit on the people who elected you to become a political celebrity, which your presidential running mate blasted then-Sen. Barack Obama for doing.

You had the opportunity to show everyone that you're willing to take on anyone who crosses the line against those who are mentally challenged, and you failed.

Please, make as much money as you can. Paraphrasing comedian Martin Lawrence, ride this train until the wheels fall off. But please, cut the crap. You're a crass politician with no true conviction. Your actions have shown that.
Posted by:gorb

#19  BH6 - her comments to Beck this week can only be construed (IMHO) as, if not an actual troofer, then as pandering to troofer conspiracists. We don't need that "I think we have not been told all the truth" crap
Posted by: Frank G   2010-02-12 17:05  

#18  actually Debra Medina is not a truther -- some of her supporters might be, but she has never went on record w/that nonsense.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2010-02-12 16:36  

#17  
The Republican party doesn't do so well in that department either. Re: McCain

Posted by CrazyFool 2010-02-12 08:40


Arguably, a case could be made that the MSM picked McCain for us. They certainly had undue influence.

I am wondering when a sufficient mass of people are going to realize that the media have been willing accomplices in our destruction.

I do not believe that the country can be saved by peaceful means alone.
Posted by: Grereque de Medici4234   2010-02-12 14:20  

#16  AlanC, the man said "cut".
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-02-12 14:12  

#15  when less than half of a partisan constituancy supports a possible candidate, its not Populism. You can rename the GOP all you want, but their still the GOP as is Sarah.
Posted by: 746   2010-02-12 14:11  

#14  Familiar with menudo, this Tripe is unfit for consumption.

Points for being able to weave so many scare words together..putting it at about a 7th grade spring semester level. Logic and critical thinking exercise puts the other side of the coin as, to use the tricks of this base level of opinion forming homework, is, "Though I am unconvinced and know better than you, I do acknowledge she is a powerful existance." which is a 'juvinile' or 'sophomoric' approach to making an arguement.

And to be as ironic as whoever this is, is, that with the statement about how Mrs. Palin basks in the glory of the media when it is that media which is manufacturing first level gut responses to the word Palin using all the obvious old tricks of the trade...I 'rank' this article below Mr. Baldwin's article the other day based purely on the fact Mr. Baldwin formed his own opinion. This writer is purely chickenscratch unable to make the cut for a Mad Libs article. The sad truth is that people like Mr. Martin, if I could be so bold, are supposed experts in the education of literature and continually brandish the sword of words like a mule carefully humps a bushel of warm bison piss.

But keep on doing what'cha doin' y'all 'cuz itsa fective yalz itsa formin my 'pinion anstuff(snort and cough, spit).
Posted by: swksvolFF   2010-02-12 12:08  

#13  grom, nah, Sarah doesn't chase with an axe. She just adjusts the windage.
Posted by: AlanC   2010-02-12 10:54  

#12  Palin should cut the hypocrisy

Conjures a picture of her chasing the author with an ax.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-02-12 10:42  

#11  Â“Either you criticize everyone who uses a word that you consider a slur, or you come across as a crass politician who is afraid to offend your chief booster.”

After Don Imus made his infamous “nappy headed ho” comments. Martin repeatedly called for his head. He also recently wrote an article titled ‘Time for President Obama to go gangsta on the GOP’. There’s nothing quite like someone being hypocritical about hypocrisy.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2010-02-12 10:00  

#10  Ivins, Keillor et al. put on the common man shtick, but in reality they're just vulgarians.
Posted by: lex   2010-02-12 09:45  

#9  I come from a long line of bovofecundians. I can smell bullshit like this a mile away.

This is one of those "Molly Ivins" type Texans, who wrap themselves in "being Texan" without really getting the essence of it, and who look down their high society noses at the riggers, cowboys, plant workers and salary workers who are the real deal, and their elitist condescension, contempt and hatred drips from everything they do.

People like Roland Martin should be horse whipped. Or worse yet (for them), they should be forced to make an honest living, working a real job.
Posted by: OldSpook   2010-02-12 09:36  

#8  the Doinks sure know how to pick 'em.

The Republican party doesn't do so well in that department either. Re: McCain

Posted by: CrazyFool   2010-02-12 08:40  

#7  The Democraps are very quick to blast others for a lack of perfection while forgiving total failure on their own side. Is Palin perfect? No. Is she better than any Democrat in DC? By far.
Posted by: AlanC   2010-02-12 08:16  

#6  Why haven't I cottoned to Palin?

I believe Martin answerd his own question with his.... question.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-02-12 07:19  

#5  Have to admit the accuracy of the comment about Palin makes Liberals squirm with her connect. She DOES connect, there is no doubt about that. And its grass roots and real.

Its kind of nice to see this clown, Roland Martin, praise a woman, Ann Richards who was a drunk ( really? ) and a Lefty drone ( oxymoron) . That was her name, huh ? Some local woman politician ( Texas governor...never heard of her) ? I dont doubt that she was. Lefty and local, I mean.

"Listening to the Spirit within" is the sort of book thingy they have a whole shelf full of at the discount used Jesus in Outer Space bookstore on Hwy 92. Right alongside Heal your Cancer with New Age Crystal Therapy.

Palin is going to run for President in 2012. And Obama will disappear just like Kerry did. Remember Kerry saluting and reporting for duty on that big screen at the Convention? And Edwards ( the beast with two backs), the best man for the democratic job...the Doinks sure know how to pick 'em.

But listen to your spirit within....

And CNN says it all.
Posted by: Pointsquad   2010-02-12 07:01  

#4  Ann Richards was a drunk, corrupt, and worst of all a socialist. Sarah Palin is a human being and an authentic American.

Ann Richards, Mr Roland, was the one who was fake-folksy, along with other fake-folksy people like Molly Ivins, Garrison Keillor, and Michael Moore. All of them have the non-coastal patter and accent down, but, bedazzled by fame, sold their values for acceptance by the cultural elite, and became Hollywood-NYC Washington-Boston-LA-San Francisco where it counts - on the inside. Once you've done that, any claims to folksy authenticity are void. Speaking in a regional accent does not give you a pass for becoming a collectivist and a cultural Marxist, and those of us "bitter clingers" who ARE real Americans (and lose the sneer quotes, boy) can see through that in a heartbeat.


Getting the accent down but missing the philosophy and outlook of real middle America is what's phony, Mr Roland. The fact that you have asserted otherwise means that you're either dishonest or stupid.

Whatever her faults, Sarah Palin is closer to the heartland where it matters than Ann Richards could ever have hoped to have been.
Posted by: no mo uro   2010-02-12 06:03  

#3  Roland Martin should stick to bass fishing.

/fake ignorance off
Posted by: no mo uro   2010-02-12 05:44  

#2  She's really gotten into their heads! Kind of fun to watch the squirming.

Oh, and Sarah had the good sense to endorse Rick Perry instead of 'truther' Debra Medina!

A drunk Ann Richards once told a constituent who was complaining about a nursing home scandal that it wasn't her job to investigate that 'stuff'; Dateline or 20/20 was supposed to do it.
Posted by: Gomez Threter7450   2010-02-12 03:21  

#1  Oh, and I'd like to see you take similarly aggressive aim on any others you might deem (in a Fair and Balanced manner, of course) to be hypocritical as well.
Posted by: gorb   2010-02-12 02:29  

00:00