You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Terror Networks 'More Dangerous to U.S. Than N. Korea, Iran'
2010-02-09
The greatest threat to the United States are not nuclear-armed countries like North Korea or Iran but "transnational non-state networks," namely Islamic extremists linked to al-Qaeda, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed Sunday.
Sorry, Hilde, there is no 'war on terror', no 'transnational non-state networks', and Guantanamo's current inmates are just misguided. Didn't you get the memo?
In an interview with CNN, Clinton said, "Most of us believe the greater threats are the transnational non-state networks, primarily the extremists -- the fundamentalist Islamic extremists who are connected to al-Qaeda in the Arab Peninsula or al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan." She said these networks "continue to try to increase the sophistication of their capacity. The attacks that they're going to make and the... biggest nightmare that any of us have is that one of these terrorist member organizations... will get their hands on a weapon of mass destruction."

But Clinton added, "In terms of a country, obviously, a nuclear-armed country like North Korea or Iran pose both a real or a potential threat."
Posted by:Steve White

#9  She's stupid. If she was smart, she'd never take the Sec State job.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-02-09 13:19  

#8  She's also missing the fact that these networks "continue to try to increase the sophistication of their capacity" through the "transnational non-state networks," namely Islamic extremists linked to al-Qaeda. Iran Hezbollah) is using Nork technology, received from Pakistan's AQ Khan, and compartmentalizing ideaologies is failing to "connect the dots". However, I don't envy her position and would rather have her at the helm than Zero.
Posted by: Lumpy Elmoluck5091   2010-02-09 10:18  

#7  JohnQC, I don't think it would work. Were she quit a while ago, for reasons of disagreement, she would have built good credentials. But that time is in the past. She missed it. She's stained.
Posted by: twobyfour   2010-02-09 09:10  

#6  Or in other words, Hillary tries to come back from irrelvancy in the administration and groom herself for a run at the presidency in 2012.
Posted by: JohnQC   2010-02-09 09:00  

#5  Thanks for explaining.
Posted by: Cameron   2010-02-09 08:27  

#4  By "transnational non-state networks," I think she means people like us on Algors' Interwebs.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2010-02-09 07:24  

#3  Grom, not sure she meant it that way. And if so, she's stoopid. Iran may decide to do nasty by proxy to have a plausible deniability, instead of direct attacks.
Posted by: twobyfour   2010-02-09 06:35  

#2  Translation "Lets give Iran a pass".
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-02-09 03:49  

#1  NOT TO BE OUTDONE, ION NEWS KERALA > seems INDIAN POLICE Commander thinks the NAXAL Threat is worse.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-02-09 01:25  

00:00