You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Seoul Denies Plan to Join U.S. Missile Defense Scheme
2010-02-05
The U.S. Defense Department claims South Korea is interested in participating in a U.S.-led ballistic missile defense system, but Seoul officials deny that any concrete commitment has been made. In a report released Monday, the department said Seoul "is also an important U.S. BMD partner" and "has indicated interest in acquiring a missile defense capability that includes land- and sea-based systems, early warning radars, and a command and control system."

"The United States and [South Korea] are working to define possible future BMD requirements," the report says. It expresses the hope that South Korea will actively participate, saying, "The United States looks forward to taking further steps to enhance operational coordination and build upon ongoing missile defense cooperation" between Seoul and Washington.

But South Korean military authorities on Wednesday dismissed the claims, saying the report does not represent an official expression of the U.S. government views. They say there has been no formal request through diplomatic channels, nor has Seoul expressed such an interest.

Defense Ministry spokesman Won Tae-jae said, "Whether to participate in the missile defense system is a matter that needs comprehensive consideration of the security situation on the Korean Peninsula and worldwide."

Meanwhile, Lt. Gen. Benjamin Mixon, commander of the U.S. Army Pacific Command, on Tuesday said the U.S. is seeking a tripartite military exercise of the South Korean and U.S. armies and Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force, a claim Seoul also denies.

In a telephone talk with Defense Department bloggers, Mixon said South Korea, the U.S., and Japan have discussed ways to stage a multilateral or trilateral exercise for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief.

The Defense Ministry denied this report as well, saying it had no such discussions and made no such plans.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  ION WMF > "TOKYO SHIMBUN" JAPANESE MEDIA: BRITISH IISS THINK-TANK REPORT SAYS RISING CHINA'S STRATEGY HAS CHANGED FROM "NATIONAL DEFENSE" ONLY TO "GLOBAL/WORLD ATTACK".

* SAME > IN 2015 CHINA WILL HAVE THE BALLISTIC MISSLE CAPABILITY TO ACCURATELY DESTROY US AIRCRAFT CARRIERS FROM ITS MAINLAND, AND HENCE BE ABLE TO EFFECTIVELY/DE FACTO CHALLENGE US HEGEMONY IN ASIA-PACIFIC.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-02-05 21:48  

#3  SK already operates the Patriot. Even if they don't already own the PAC-3, the PAC-2s have some anti-missile capability good for the kind of short range missiles the Norks would launch against them. And I'm sure US Forces are well protected w/ PAC-3s. The SKs also have Aegis ships and are building more. The country is only about 150 miles wide and 100 miles at the DMZ.
Posted by: ed   2010-02-05 10:17  

#2  Given the stick we just put into the Poles over missile defense, Seoul would be smart to pursue its own program in its own self interest and not wait till the 11th hours for another American administration to pull the rung from underneath it as a 'bargaining' in another useless round of talks with the Nkors.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-02-05 08:48  

#1  If SKOR is NOT interested in a missile defense scheme, then we need to pull all our people out, because it is dead certain the Norks ARE interested in a missile offense scheme.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-02-05 00:26  

00:00