You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Afghan-Nato operation kills 32 Taliban
2010-02-05
[Dawn] Thirty-two Taliban and three soldiers have been killed in an Afghan-Nato operation in Helmand province ahead of a major anti-Taliban push, the provincial government said on Thursday.

The operation took place in Nad Ali district, west of the provincial capital Lashkar Gar, on Wednesday, provincial government spokesman Daud Ahmadi told AFP.

"We had an operation in the Nad Ali area last night," Ahmadi said. "During the operation 32 Taliban were killed and the bodies of some of them remained in the area."

The southern province of Helmand, along with neighbouring Kandahar, has been the hub of the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan since their regime was pushed from power in the US-led invasion in late 2001.

The Marjah area, south of Nad Ali, is set to be the scene of a major military operation headed by US Marines who have been massing in their thousands, along with Afghan and Nato troops, for weeks in preparation.

Afghan and Nato officials said Wednesday the operation to clear the Taliban from one of their last bastions should begin soon but gave no specific timeframe.

About 113,000 international troops are deployed in Afghanistan to eradicate the Taliban, with another 40,000 reinforcements due to arrive over the coming months. Most reinforcement will be sent to the southern insurgency hotspots.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Point taken, Old Patiot. My concern is whether we are adding 'targets' to our staffing, or people intended to fight. It's hard to know how to fight a war of this kind (probably why Bush diverted focus to Iraq as early as possible.) Sometimes it's about killing people, sometimes about protecting them, sometimes simply bribing them - I have serious doubts ANY strategy will actually work in A'stan.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-02-05 18:04  

#4  Old Patriot is correct in that we do not call them REMF anymore...they are FOBBITTs
Posted by: TopMac   2010-02-05 17:30  

#3  Non-lethal weapons, spicey-hot paintball, wooden warning bombs, and annoying low-level sonic booms....all coming soon. Hope & Change on the battlefield.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-02-05 12:09  

#2  From what I understand, Glenmore, the term "REMF" is no longer operational. There ARE no "rear areas" in asymmetrical warfare. If called upon to do so, it won't be the first time cooks, bakers, and candlestick makers have been handed a rifle and told "point to the outside and pull the trigger". It isn't always effective, but it sure causes confusion in the enemy's ranks.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2010-02-05 12:07  

#1  153,000 troops soon. How many fighters? 100,000 fighters, with license to kill, and there will be an abundance of hassenfeffer. 150,000 REMFs and 3000 handcuffed fighters will end up as 5000 allied casualties.
Posted by: Glenmore   2010-02-05 00:19  

00:00