You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Gates Tries to Get F-35 Program Back on Course
2010-02-03
WASHINGTON -- The Joint Strike Fighter was supposed to be the program that broke the mold, proof that the Pentagon could build something affordable, dependable and without much drama. But rather than being the Chevrolet of the skies, as it was once billed, the fighter plane, also called the F-35, has turned into the Pentagon's biggest budget-buster. And with worries growing that the rise in costs could overwhelm other programs, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates fired the general in charge this week and said he would withhold $614 million in fees from the prime contractor, Lockheed Martin.
That's ok, we always have the F-22 to fall back on.....Ooops.
The decision was an embarrassment for Lockheed Martin, the nation's largest military contractor, which could eventually draw at least a quarter of its sales from the F-35. But Pentagon officials said they wanted to make sure they avoided the kind of death spiral that had caused so many other weapons programs to collapse.

The Air Force, the Navy and the Marines are planning to buy more than 2,400 of the planes. But any delays could force them to spend billions of dollars on less advanced fighters to avoid a shortfall. That, in turn, would reduce their orders for the F-35, driving up the price for each plane and forcing them to cut orders further.
Posted by:Steve White

#6  ...Some folks who are in a position to suspect the worst are telling me the Air National Guard - which was going to get a good number of the -35s - is quietly looking for a way to cut the numbers or get out of it entirely. It's bad enough that some ANG staff are flat out denying that a couple of units that have been publicly ID'd as getting the -35 will ever see the airplane.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2010-02-03 19:18  

#5  Besides - if you get 737's you can use them to shuttle the Queen Pelosi's family around the country and spend the savings on booze.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2010-02-03 10:48  

#4  Wait til the Brits inform them that they're canceling their two fleet carriers and won't need their share of the F-35s ...
Posted by: Steve White   2010-02-03 09:39  

#3  Heck, buy a 737, I understand they have much more room for electronics than a F-35.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2010-02-03 09:36  

#2  If you're going to take all the electronics out of it and put in your own, you might as well stick with F-16's anyway rather than trying it with a plane where most of the cost is electronics you won't use to begin with and all the R&D cost is integrating the electronics into the airframe without screwing up the RCS.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2010-02-03 09:33  

#1  ROTFLMAO.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2010-02-03 03:10  

00:00