You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Giffords' re-election bid could be hurt by Obama backlash
2010-02-03
As President Barack Obama and Democratic congressional leaders scramble to find a new message after a string of election defeats, Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords appears increasingly vulnerable for her loyalty to the White House.

Just four months ago, the two-term Democrat looked so secure in her re-election that her district was rated solidly Democratic by the "Cook Political Report," a nonpartisan newsletter that analyzes congressional races. Since then, the rating has slipped to "likely Democratic" and then to "leans Democratic."

The latest drop came shortly after Republican state Sen. Jonathan Paton announced he was joining three other GOP candidates to challenge Giffords.

"Giffords will have to use all of her considerable campaign-trail talents to defend her votes for the stimulus package and the health-care and energy bills in a district that has a track record supporting 'middle of the road' candidates," wrote analyst David Wasserman for the "Cook Political Report."

Giffords, whose 8th Congressional District encompasses parts of Tucson and communities in Arizona's southeastern corner, voted with the president 90 percent of the time last year, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan publication Congressional Quarterly.

Although Democratic Reps. Harry Mitchell and Ann Kirkpatrick also are considered vulnerable, they are less closely identified with Obama at a time when his priorities have been losing support in public-opinion polls and at the ballot box.

Those policies, including health-care reform and government spending on stimulus projects, were successfully attacked by Republicans who won the Massachusetts Senate seat last month and governorships in Virginia and New Jersey last fall.
Posted by:Fred

#5  "I think that you are right and the Dems have started a political fiendfyre storm that they can not extinguish. By the time it burns itself out the carnage will likely be vast."

I'll order extra popcorn, Alan. :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2010-02-03 19:27  

#4  I've read them all, AlanC. They're great fun, good but not great children's literature... significantly better than much of what's out there for the age group.
Posted by: trailing wife   2010-02-03 18:28  

#3  The only problem with these vulnerable Dems is that the Repubs are ganging up to be the nominee. This takes money away from the general campaign especially if the primaries are closer to the general election. In 2008 you couldn't find good conservative or right-thinking Republicans to even run in a general election much less a primary. Now the flood gates are open it looks like all the vulnerable seats have multiple candidate Republican primaries.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2010-02-03 12:13  

#2  Hate to admit it but since I started substituting in middle school a few months ago, I read the Harry Potter books.

In the last one the phenomenon of "fiendfyre" is introduced. I burns anything and everything and cannot be put out by normal means. The person that started it gets killed because no one else knows how to put it out.

Bobby, I think that you are right and the Dems have started a political fiendfyre storm that they can not extinguish. By the time it burns itself out the carnage will likely be vast.
Posted by: AlanC   2010-02-03 09:57  

#1  An Obama backlash, compounded by anti-incumbent sentiment going back to Bush. A fire started and stoked by the Dems.
Posted by: Bobby   2010-02-03 06:29  

00:00