| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Iraq | |
| Iraqi view of British Chilcot inquiry | |
| 2010-01-30 | |
"We should look forwards, not back," said one young traffic policeman - out of uniform, relaxing in a pavement tea shop on his day off. "We should stop arguing about whether the invasion was right or wrong. Britain should look forward too," he added. But Laith, the owner of the tea stall, was less forgiving. "We've seen no positive changes here since 2003," he said. He complained of poor water and electricity supplies, rising unemployment, and a general lack of public services. Indeed. The people of Iraq grapple with a long list of problems on a daily basis, not least the continuing violence which - despite security gains - still claims the lives of hundreds of people every month. The 2003 invasion is regarded as an American adventure here first and foremost. The circumstances surrounding Britain's decision to go to war are not top of people's list of concerns. The Chilcot inquiry has received little attention in the Iraqi press. What coverage there has been has tended to see the affair as an internal British affair. Some have questioned its timing, pointing to the UK's imminent general election. Those who are following the inquiry in Baghdad however, will be focusing on two questions. The first is the apparent lack of adequate post-war planning on the part of the coalition forces. When it comes to the problems mentioned by Laith, the tea-shop owner, many people here trace them back to post-invasion mismanagement. The second is the question of legality. There are those in the government who fear that if the Chilcot inquiry throws doubt upon the legality of the war under international law, it could provide fuel for insurgents by providing them with a justification, in their eyes, to continue their campaign. There are plenty of people in Iraq who disagree with Laith, who say they have seen positive change in Iraq since 2003. There has been a huge growth in the availability of consumer goods: computers and mobile phones. People also feel freer to express their political opinions openly and assertively without fear of persecution. One test of these new freedoms will come on 7 March when Iraqis will vote in a general election. If this can be held peacefully and if, crucially, the result helps to overcome divisions between the various sectarian and ethnic groups, then Iraq may indeed be able to start looking forward rather than back. | |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #5 Turns out that the Iraqis aren't paying much attention to a bunch of babbling Brits ... and thats a good thing , cos the only voice people really hear in and outisde the uk is just that UKIP do offer alternatives to main stream 'fanciful politics' , There is/has been far too much 'yoghurt weaving' in the UK since Thatcher/Reagan times (not saying they were sweet times, but at least there was 'gelling' relationships and cohesive policy .. Lets be frank, (no not uber poster here) ... this mess wouldnt happen under her . |
| Posted by: Oscar 2010-01-30 19:26 |
| #4 I wonder what would happen if UKIP floated the idea of privatizing the broadcast media, eliminating the onerous TV tax, and limiting the number of media outlets that could be controlled by a single company. |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2010-01-30 09:25 |
| #3 BBC Personnel responsible for the News BBC = Bad British Channel |
| Posted by: Big Angerese3014 2010-01-30 09:24 |
| #2 There has been a huge growth in the availability of consumer goods: computers and mobile phones. People also feel freer to express their political opinions openly and assertively without fear of persecution. Obviously these are an anathema to the neo-Socialist on either side of the Atlantic. That's why they still oppose the liberation of Iraq. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2010-01-30 08:53 |
| #1 The BBC apparently won't ever give up its anti-war tub-thumping. listening to its Radio 4 coverage is a case of sneering presenter after sneering presenter introducing the subject, followed by sneering correspondents spinning the events with scepticism at every turn, followed by talking heads' analysis or discussions - all of whom, without exception, are in lock step with the BBC agenda, ie the war was unquestionably wrong, there can be no justification, it was a disaster, the motives of those involved were evil, and the only reaction from anyone participating in the inquiry or observing, is contempt for Blair et al. The BBC, as usual, is craven, arrogant, partisan and wrong at every turn. |
| Posted by: Bulldog 2010-01-30 04:58 |