You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Drug Company and HMO Lobbyists Try to Save Democrat in Massachusetts
2010-01-12
With Democrat Martha Coakley in trouble in the Massachusetts special election to fill Ted Kennedy's seat, Democrats could lose vote No. 60 for President Obama's health-care bill. In response, an army of lobbyists for drug companies, health insurance companies, and hospitals has teamed up to throw a high-dollar Capitol Hill fundraiser for Coakley next Tuesday night.

Of the 22 names on the host committee--meaning they raised $10,000 or more for Coakley--17 are federally registered lobbyists, 15 of whom have health-care clients. Of the other five hosts, one is married to a lobbyist, one was a lobbyist in Pennsylvania, another is a lawyer at a lobbying firm, and another is a corporate CEO. Oh, and of course, there's also the political action commitee for Boston Scientific Corporation.

All the leading drug companies have lobbyists on Coakley's host committee: Pfizer, Merck, Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Astra-Zeneca, and more. On the insurance side of things, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Cigna, Humana, HealthSouth, and United Health all are represented on the host committee.

Those HMOs (like Aetna) or drug companies who don't have lobbyists in Coakley's top tier of fundraisers? They're covered, because the host committee includes four lobbyists representing the Pharmaceutical Researchers and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), two representing America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), and one representing the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO)

So think of these top donors to health-care reform's 60th vote next time President Obama claims that he's battling the special interests in this battle. The army listed below is on Obama's side, and these clients will all benefit from "reform."
Posted by:Fred

#6  Well, Coakley would truly change something, alright. Hopefully people have gotten past falling for empty, hard-to-define terms like "hope", "change", "true", etc. and start looking at the substance of the words.
Posted by: gorb   2010-01-12 10:24  

#5  I can't believe some prog-leftist turd was actually blovating the other day about how they needed to frame Coakley as "the true change agent in the election".
Posted by: Mitch H.   2010-01-12 09:55  

#4  You talkin' about Da Chicago Way, lotp?
Posted by: Bobby   2010-01-12 07:59  

#3  Depends on how mobilized the zombie vote is. I hear they have a hell of a get out the vote effort up there.
Posted by: lotp   2010-01-12 07:50  

#2  Massachusetts will elect a Republican to the Senate in this next week.

After more than sixty years of JFK/RFK/EMK (EMK - Edward Moore Kennedy - Teddy to You) Dynasty, the serfs of have but one chance to raise the yoke of involuntary and indentured servitude established by the Autocratic Kennedy Family and Democratic Party of Massachusetts.

The election of BROWN will be the Emancipation Proclamation of 2010.
Posted by: Ho Chi Ebbaiger4387   2010-01-12 06:28  

#1  And yet, the mainstream press refuses to pull back the curtain and show the truth. The continue to paint the people who oppose this boondoggle bill as the "tools" of the very same monied interests and power brokers who are now propping up the rotting and putrid zombie corpse that used to be John F Kennedy's Democrat Party.

Wake UP Dems and leftards - you're being used.
Posted by: OldSpook   2010-01-12 02:21  

00:00