You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Liberalism is What is Killing California
2010-01-11
WASHINGTON -- Dalton Trumbo (1905-1976) was a hero to the American left, partly because of his 1939 anti-war novel "Johnny Got His Gun." Trumbo's title modified the lyric "Johnny get your gun" from the World War I song "Over There." Trumbo's "Johnny" is horribly maimed in that war. Now we need a novel titled "Berkeley Got Its Liberalism." Pending that, we have Tad Friend's report, in the Jan. 4 New Yorker, on maimed Berkeley.

California, a laboratory of liberalism, is spiraling downward, driven by a huge budget deficit. So the University of California system's budget was cut 20 percent. Then the system increased in-state student fees 32 percent to ... $10,302. But that is still 70 percent below student costs at Stanford and other private institutions in California that Berkeley considers no better than it is.

Last September, Friend reports, 5,000 Berkeley employees and students rallied in Sproul Plaza, scene of protests that ignited the 1960s and helped make Ronald Reagan governor. Some protesters, says Friend, were "naked except for signs that read 'BUDGET TRANSPARENCY.'" At an indoor meeting, a "student facilitator" used a projection screen to summarize proposals, which included: "rolling strikes"; "nationalize all universities"; "socialist revolution"; "a tent city in Sacramento"; "create a shadow Board of Regents"; "occupy Wells Fargo Bank in downtown Oakland"; "worker-student control of the university"; "strike in March"; "act now, f--- March"; "capitalism is bad." Toward the end of the seven-hour meeting, participants shouted "General strike! General strike!"

In its impact on the institution, and on students trying to grip the lower rungs of the ladder of social mobility, the UC system's crisis is sad. This academic year, only one-sixth of the normal number of new faculty have been hired at Berkeley. The Cal State system -- a cut below the UC campuses -- will enroll 40,000 fewer students this year than last. But because the professoriate is overwhelmingly liberal, there is rough justice in its having to live with liberalism's consequences, which include this:

Kevin Starr, author of an eight-volume -- so far -- history of the (formerly) Golden State, says California is "on the verge" of becoming something without an American precedent -- "a failed state." William Voegeli, writing in the Claremont Review of Books, tartly says that "Rome wasn't sacked in a day, and California didn't become Argentina overnight." Indeed.

It took years for liberalism's redistributive itch to create an income tax so steeply progressive that it prompts the flight from the state of wealth-creators: "Between 1990 and 2007," Voegeli writes, "some 3.4 million more Americans moved from California to one of the other 49 states than moved to California from another state."

And the state's income tax -- liberalism codified -- intensifies the effects of business cycles on the state's revenue stream: During booms, the stream surges and stimulates government spending; during contractions, revenues dwindle but the new government spending continues. Voegeli says that if California's spending had grown no faster than population growth and inflation from 1992 to 2006, it would have been $65 billion less in 2006, and per capita government outlays then would have equaled not those of Somalia or Mississippi but of Oregon, which is hardly "a hellish paradigm of Social Darwinism."

It took years for liberalism's mania for micromanaging life with entangling regulations to make California's once creative economy resemble Gulliver immobilized by the Lilliputians' many threads. The state, which between 1990 and 2007 lost 26 percent of its factory jobs and 35 percent of its high-tech manufacturing jobs, ranks behind only New York, another of liberalism's laboratories, in the number of outward-bound moving vans.

It took years for compassionate liberalism to make California's welfare menu contribute to the state becoming an importer of Mexico's poverty. It took years for servile liberalism to turn the state into what Voegeli calls a "unionocracy," run by and for unionized public employees, such as public safety employees who can retire at 50 and receive 90 percent of the final year's pay for life.

Friend reports that when the seven-hour meeting ended, the protest moved to the UC president's house. Two buses carried "some hundred Berkeley students and members of AFSCME." Perfect.

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is one reason why California's government employees -- their numbers grew 24 percent between 1997 and 2007 -- are the nation's most highly compensated. And why California's economy is being suffocated by the weight of government. And why the state's budget has little left over for Berkeley.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#13  The bottom line is that politicians of both parties are hooked on unrestrained illegal immigration as an ecomomic stimulus. Americans have not reproduced in big numbers since the advent of the birth control pill. Even if illegals are a strain on welfare systems they do produce demand for housing, give employers cheap and disposible workers etc. Until we either have more kids or change the population growth driven ecomomic model that our system demands, we are stuck.

Face it, if large numbers of illegals move into your neighborhood, what do you do? You buy a new house in a newer area.. This mechanism has driven california's economy for 50 years.
Posted by: Don Vito Spoluns7748   2010-01-11 23:39  

#12  Schools, hospitals and prisons were also affected by the Golden State's wonderful judicial system. Few, if any other states, mandate things like aromatherapy and alternative treatments for inmates. That crap can't be cut....it's been mandated by the courts in your state.

So now, when California's schools are a national joke, your hospitals are going broke, and your prison system is failing, you try to turn all of that on the rest of us, saying the rest of us are all to blame, too? You have got to be freakin' kidding me.

The rest of us were never consulted on whether or not your state's dumb policies should have been enacted. Nope, never, not once. We certainly never got to vote on any of it. California voters made all those idiot decisions by themselves, thanks. Your state plowed ahead, did boneheaded things, and if your post shows the typical attitude (hope not) you still don't want to own up to it.

Texas, New Mexico and Arizona have been dealing with the same kind of stress on their school, health care and prison systems from illegal immigration and in-migration from other states. Their budgets got hammered. Arizona's got a huge deficit, and New Mexico could use some help, too. None of those three states are expecting, or worse yet, demanding a bailout. Take a hint.
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2010-01-11 21:27  

#11  What about schools, hospitals and prisons?

How's the state employee union influence in Texas? Texas is a right to work state. That too is a political judgment call by the state.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-01-11 21:08  

#10  Lets not fergit DETROIT'S FIFTY PERCENT
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2010-01-11 20:33  

#9  It would be interesting if illegal aliens were shoved across the border at San Ysidro with only the clothes on their backs with everything else confiscated by the state as partial compensation for the cost of providing for them. If the state can confiscate property used in the commission of a crime, there seems to be precedent. Also, shut down electronic remittances.
Posted by: rwv   2010-01-11 19:42  

#8  OK. You got welfare covered. What about schools, hospitals and prisons?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2010-01-11 19:20  

#7  When you make cognizant decision, luck in not involved. Texas and Florida did not develop a state welfare and program system like California even though they too have migrant labor businesses. That is choice.

When a federal judge mandates equal access to programs for citizens and illegals alike, it is relative to within that state for state programs. They do not decree that people in one state are entitled to program standards of another state. If one state's government chooses to engage in programs which are generous compared to others, the other states are not obligated to provide similar levels of remuneration to those within their borders. That is a local choice that results in either attracting or deflecting migration and its consequences.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-01-11 17:47  

#6  Lucky Texas. But somehow I don't think Texas has as many jobs for them as we do. Look at it this way, we used to be a red state and now we're blue. How do you think an Orange County congressional district that once elected B1 Bob Dornan turned around and elected Loretta Sanchez? OK, maybe Dornan was a kook but you'd think if you were a member of the Republican party you'd have been screaming about the transformation of all those electoral college votes from Republican to Democrat. But there was never a peep. Why not?

I don't deny that California politicians are irresponsible. They are the worst. But they've been operating hand-in-hand with the federal government in both Republican and Democrat administrations. The federal government has to take its fair share of the blame for California.

What's gonna happen when we stop paying for all the goodies those illegal aliens get? Will AG Holder take us to court for disobeying federal mandates?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2010-01-11 16:30  

#5  ..remember you are all just as much to blame for what has happened to California as I am.

Except the same Washington attitude applied to Texas just as California. Texas made decisions that California did not.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2010-01-11 15:52  

#4   Open borders are an issue, but not the biggest part of the California disaster.
The biggest political party/persuasion in the USA is the "Free Lunch" Party, whose members want to spend, spend, spend on programs they favor and never ever pay the price, at least not in their lifetimes. The Free Lunch Party has both liberals & conservatives in it.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2010-01-11 15:20  

#3  That's exactly right, Besoeker.

Always remember, folks, it isn't just home-grown liberalism that is killing California. This state is a victim of your federal government which has been derelict in its duty to protect us from being overrun by illegal aliens. I've said it before and I will take this opportunity to say it again: this is the state that gave you Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. Could we do it again? With all the demographic changes and all the other socialist bullshit that has been forced upon us by Washington, DC? When you take than holier-than-thou position that I've noticed more and more lately on Rantburg, remember you are all just as much to blame for what has happened to California as I am. We are a part of your country, the United States, so what is happening here should alarm you just as much as it does me. And remember this too, if they can do it to California they can do it to you just as easily.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2010-01-11 12:05  

#2  Please let me see if I understand all this...

If you cross the North Korean border illegally you get 12 years hard labor.
If you cross the Iranian border illegally you are detained indefinitely.
If you cross the Afghan border illegally, you get shot.
If you cross the Turkish border illegally, you spend the rest of your life
in prison!
But, if you cross the U.S. border illegally and enter California you get:

A driver's license
A social security card
Welfare
Food stamps
Voting rights, no ID required
and, free health care?

Is that correct? Please advise.
Posted by: Besoeker   2010-01-11 11:32  

#1  Ooops! Missed the link.

Liberalism is What is Killing California
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2010-01-11 11:16  

00:00