Submit your comments on this article | ||||
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia | ||||
Putin threatens new missiles to counter U.S. shield | ||||
2009-12-30 | ||||
![]() The powerful ex-president said in Vladivostok that the dispute was the main issue holding up negotiations on a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). Those tensions could be eased if Washington provides Moscow with full details of the missile shield plan, Mr. Putin added. He said Russia would reciprocate with information about its offensive missiles.
"It's a negotiating ploy," said Clifford Kupchan, a Russia specialist at the Eurasia Group, a risk analysis and consulting firm. "Both sides want a START treaty, but Putin wants at least informal constraints even around Obama's missile defense lite."
Nevertheless, Mr. Kupchan said, Russia remains "in perpetuity scared of a potential U.S. ability to neutralize their second strike capability." A former U.S. intercontinental ballistic missile officer and current Defense Department official told The Washington Times that Mr. Putin is "trying to get us to drop as many missile defense systems as we will drop. He is going to push until he finds that line where we say, 'No more.' "
"If we want to retain the balance, we have to establish an exchange of information: Let the U.S. partners provide us information on [their] missile defense while we will give them information on [our] offensive weapons," Mr. Putin said. A U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the delicate state of negotiations told The Times, "We are aware of Putin's comments. The bottom line is that as the president said alongside President Medvedev in Copenhagen, we continue to work on the START treaty." Indeed, Mr. Medvedev said in Copenhagen on Dec. 18, "Our positions are very close and almost all the issues that we've been discussing for the last month are almost closed. And there are certain technical details which we can encounter, many agreements which require further work. I hope that we will be able to do it in a quite brief period of time." The Obama administration -- like its predecessor -- has insisted that missile defense is aimed not at Russia but at Iran and North Korea. Its decision to scrap the Bush plan, however, was seen by many as a concession to Russia and part of an effort to "reset" relations and improve cooperation on other issues, including Iran.
Mrs. Gati said the Putin remarks could reflect Russian concern that the U.S. decision not to base a missile defense system in the Czech Republic and Poland did not eliminate plans for the system altogether. "The Russians have always been concerned about our defensive systems, and their original satisfaction that we backed away from the plan in Central Europe is now over," she said. "Now they are facing the realities of what that new system is and the fact that the U.S. continues and will continue to have systems that they regard as a threat, even if these systems are not a threat." | ||||
Posted by:Steve White |
#7 Putin threatens new missiles to counter U.S. shield excellent headline. double deep. |
Posted by: Mike Hunt 2009-12-30 20:57 |
#6 Interceptors are a heck of a lot cheaper than ICBMs, and even after the $787b stimulus we've got more money than you. Bring it on, Pooty. |
Posted by: Mike 2009-12-30 14:01 |
#5 If Putin wants to be like that then lets get back to work on those missile defense shields. |
Posted by: Indian Giver 2009-12-30 13:04 |
#4 How much would the mullahs pay Puttie to put roadblocks in front of the defense shield aimed at them? Is that too cynical a question? |
Posted by: AlanC 2009-12-30 10:25 |
#3 I think Putin is trying to make lemonade out of the Bulava lemons. They need a new class of missile anyway, but the Duma doesn't want to pay for it, so Putin is trying to pretend that Russia is threatened to squeeze the money out of them. |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2009-12-30 09:10 |
#2 "The Russians have always been concerned about our defensive systems, But not so much their own defensive systems which they can sell to Iran to counter a threat from the US ir IS. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2009-12-30 07:36 |
#1 Our defensive systems aren't designed to defend against a massive attack from a country such as Russia. They are designed to defend against smaller attack. If Russia is worried about this, it says to me that they must have a strategy of limited nuclear war that such a defensive system would interfere with. It would potentially eliminate the ability or Russia to intimidate by threatening to launch a small number of nukes and force them to go "big" quickly. It stinks. Force them to go big or keep them on the launcher. I am not in favor of anything that allows Russia or anyone else to play an intimidation game with the threat of a small strike. |
Posted by: crosspatch 2009-12-30 03:47 |