| Submit your comments on this article |
| Israel-Palestine-Jordan |
| Nuclear and Chemical War in the Middle East because of “Climate Change” |
| 2009-12-26 |
| The Palestine Telegraph explains "Climate Change" |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #8 don't need to. I read the news. FOAD |
| Posted by: Frank G 2009-12-26 21:36 |
| #7 Kamil Elshami obviously drank HIS Kool-Aid, And- so now, will the rest of you ME mooslime-Haters please drink yours? |
| Posted by: Asymmetrical Triangulation 2009-12-26 21:29 |
| #6 The only climate change that is likely to lead to war is the one resulting from the replacement of GWB, a strong leader, with a pompous pussy in the White House. |
| Posted by: rwv 2009-12-26 16:30 |
| #5 You're closer so I'm glad you're comfortable. But it still worries me. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2009-12-26 10:07 |
| #4 That threat of Islamist surrogate use is a standard Pakistani pressure tactic. The reality is that the Pakistani feudal elite is in control and will remain so. |
| Posted by: john frum 2009-12-26 09:59 |
| #3 Then they shouldn't have built the weapons. There's far too much chance for fluidity in the Pak leadership leading to first use through surrogates. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2009-12-26 09:34 |
| #2 The ruling classes in India or Pakistan are not interested in nuclear warfare. |
| Posted by: john frum 2009-12-26 09:29 |
| #1 I doubt it. It's far more likely a nuclear war in SW Asia will cause climate change. See the current issue of Scientific American. Nuclear Winter is a much more widely accepted probability than Global Warming. |
| Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2009-12-26 06:52 |