Submit your comments on this article | ||
Science & Technology | ||
World views Copenhagen conference as a total failure | ||
2009-12-22 | ||
![]() Even the campaigners and environmentalists were left stunned at what they viewed as a total disappointment. At the end of the 193-nation UN summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, there was no binding deal for combating global warming, a move led by the United States and China, the world's top two emitters of greenhouse gases. The Danish government had been hoping for a positive outcome, but the Danes themselves expressed their frustration after being left with no binding deal. India called the climate talks a complete failure and said there were no legally binding targets that the developed countries would have to meet.
President Hugo Chavez said that negotiations were conducted in the wrong way and accused world leaders, including US President Barack Obama, of only seeking a face-saving agreement. He went on to add that the United States should join the Kyoto Protocol and empower it and answer to the world in a transparent way. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad described capitalism and materialism as the root causes of the world's environmental crisis. Several other nations also opposed the deal championed by Obama and five emerging economies, including India and China. The summit agreement made on Saturday, December 19 stopped far short of a full endorsement of the plan, which sets a target of limiting global warming to a maximum 2 degree Celsius rise over pre-industrial times. The plan does not specify greenhouse gas cuts needed to achieve the 2 degree Celsius goal that is seen as a threshold for dangerous changes such as more floods, droughts, mudslides, sandstorms, and rising seas. | ||
Posted by:Fred |
#7 Their definition of failure may not match mine |
Posted by: European Conservative 2009-12-22 21:04 |
#6 Good |
Posted by: Rex Mundi 2009-12-22 16:50 |
#5 Well not a total failure. More and more people became aware of what a scam global warming is. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2009-12-22 10:13 |
#4 The majority rightly view AGW as a scam by governments to tax them more, and more rent-seeking for big business. Unless the majority is prepared to express their feelings in meaningful ways, these feelings don't matter. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2009-12-22 07:01 |
#3 Notice the MSM slant that an agreement was a good thing? The majority rightly view AGW as a scam by governments to tax them more, and more rent-seeking for big business. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2009-12-22 05:12 |
#2 BHARAT RAKSHAK > GORDON BROWN PROPOSES NEW BODY TO POLICE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT ISSUES, so that in future "Copenhagen"-style world enviro summits will not "fail". |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2009-12-22 02:03 |
#1 Yeah. Only $100 billion/year swindled from those who worked for it. |
Posted by: ed 2009-12-22 01:19 |