You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Obama Orders First Release of a "High-Value Detainee"?
2009-12-22
Another important note about the Obama administration's transfer of Gitmo detainee Abdullahi Sudi Arale to Somaliland: In June 2007, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman called Arale a high-value detainee."
"Abdullahi Sudi Arale is suspected of being a member of the Al Qaeda terrorist network in East Africa, serving as a courier between East Africa Al Qaeda (EAAQ) and Al Qaeda in Pakistan. Since his return from Pakistan to Somalia in September 2006, he has held a leadership role in the EAAQ-affiliated Somali Council of Islamic Courts (CIC).

There is significant information available indicating that Arale has been assisting various EAAQ-affiliated extremists in acquiring weapons and explosives, and has facilitated terrorist travel by providing false documents for AQ and EAAQ-affiliates and foreign fighters traveli

That phrase was reserved for less than twenty detainees. As far as I know, the U.S. has never transferred a "high-value detainee" from its custody.

One "high-value detainee," Ahmed Ghailani, was transferred to New York for trial. But he is, of course, still detained by the U.S.
Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, a Tanzanian who faces terrorism charges for his role in the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies, asked a judge to order U.S. prosecutors to surrender information about "black sites" where he was held.
Does this mean that Arale was the first "high-value detainee" ever transferred from American custody?
Posted by:Sherry

#3  Yeah - stick a US $250,000 bank deposit into a bank book bearing his name, and leaflet drop copies of that bank book all over Somaliland. Then, grab a bag of popcorn, and watch.
Posted by: Lone Ranger   2009-12-22 21:30  

#2  Of course he was released - he cooperated in all sorts of secret anti-AQ ops over the last two years. Didn't he? I'm sure that's the only reason we would ever release any of those prisoners.
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-12-22 20:02  

#1  Geeze louise. If you wanna look like a "good guy", fine. Release these pigs, go ahead. But have the good sense to have them whacked in some dark alley shortly after release, huh?
Posted by: mojo   2009-12-22 14:17  

00:00