Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
The Louisiana Purchase: Sweeteners for the South |
2009-11-22 |
![]() It was an awkward moment (not least because her figure is 20 times the original Louisiana Purchase price). But it was fairly representative of a Senate debate that seems to be scripted in the Southern Gothic style. The plot was gripping -- the bill survived Saturday's procedural test without a single vote to spare -- and it brought out the rank partisanship, the self-absorption and all the other pathologies of modern politics. If that wasn't enough of a Tennessee Williams story line, the debate even had, playing the lead role, a Southerner named Blanche with a flair for the dramatic. Even when she finally announced her support, at 2:30 in the afternoon, Lincoln made clear that she still planned to hold out for many more concessions in the debate that will consume the next month. "My decision to vote on the motion to proceed is not my last, nor only, chance to have an impact on health-care reform," she announced. No, I'm sure it's not. |
Posted by:KBK |
#12 Why not simply level the Rockies and fill in the gulf around Naw'leens? It'd be about the same price. |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2009-11-22 21:34 |
#11 Reminds one of Mike Royko's proposed seal for the city of Chicago: "Ubi est mea?" |
Posted by: lex 2009-11-22 19:38 |
#10 Of course now they know what sort of 'madam' she is... all they need to do is negotiate the price. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2009-11-22 19:07 |
#9 and leave cab fare on the dresser. She has high standards |
Posted by: Frank G 2009-11-22 18:40 |
#8 I wonder if she's obligated to vote on the actual bill as well or if they just bought her vote to get it into debate. The honourable senator has made it clear this only rented her vote to bring the bill to the floor for discussion, rjschwarz. They'll need to pay another installment to get her to go along with each step along the way to cloture. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2009-11-22 18:21 |
#7 The ruling power in Congress consists of arrogant elitists who are all about foisting tyranny on the rest of us. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2009-11-22 17:53 |
#6 We all need to ask our congressmen what they are bringing home for us and tell 'em that if it isn't at least 50M they're not working hard enough for us. Raw, blatant corruption is what it is. |
Posted by: Oregon Doodle 2009-11-22 15:03 |
#5 I wonder if she's obligated to vote on the actual bill as well or if they just bought her vote to get it into debate. It is exactly this kind of trading favors and pork that has gotten us into this mess. I'd love to see everyone taking pork thrown on on their butts next election. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2009-11-22 13:27 |
#4 a smelly pirate hooker |
Posted by: Frank G 2009-11-22 09:44 |
#3 Just "spreadin' the wealth" like Obumble promised. |
Posted by: regular joe 2009-11-22 09:12 |
#2 "It appears the difference between moderate democrats and liberal ones is a $300mm surcharge using other people's money." Fixed that for ya', joe. |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2009-11-22 08:38 |
#1 It appears the difference between moderate democrats and liberal ones is a $300mm surcharge. |
Posted by: regular joe 2009-11-22 08:34 |