You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Palin photographer breached contract with sale to Newsweek
2009-11-19
What on earth was Sarah Palin thinking when she posed in a pair of teeny-tiny gym shorts for a photograph that ended up on the cover of Newsweek -- a cover she has called "sexist"? Perhaps she was thinking that her image would only appear in the magazine she was posing for, Runner's World, and nowhere else, at least not for months and months. If so, she had good reason -- since, as DailyFinance has learned, the photographer who shot the picture violated his contract by reselling them to Newsweek.

That photographer, Brian Adams, could not immediately be reached, and his agent, Kelly Price, declined to comment, saying, "I keep all of my clients' business private."

But a spokeswoman for Runner's World confirms that Adams's contract contained a clause stipulating that his photos of Palin would be under embargo for a period of one year following publication -- meaning until August 2010. "Runner's World did not provide Newsweek with its cover image," the spokeswoman said. "It was provided to Newsweek by the photographer's stock agency, without Runner's World's knowledge or permission." The spokeswoman declined to say whether Runner's World intends to respond to Adams's breach of contract with legal action.

But while Adams clearly violated his agreement, it's not clear he did so without Runner's World's consent. A source with knowledge of the situation says multiple outlets, including Time, approached Runner's World after the photos first appeared on its website in July to inquire about obtaining the reuse rights. Those who inquired were forwarded to Adams. Editors at the magazine were aware of negotiations to resell the pictures, and were primarily concerned to see that Runner's World received prominent credit, says the source. In the event, Newsweek credited Runner's World right on its cover.
Posted by:Fred

#13  Those are gym shorts, but nothing like teeny-tiny.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-11-19 23:59  

#12  So, that's what 'teeny-tiny gym shorts' look like. More of them! (Or should that be less of them)? ;-)
Posted by: rhodesiafever   2009-11-19 21:08  

#11  Don't leave us hanging, Mitch - give us the line. ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-11-19 18:12  

#10  The sexism wasn't in the photo - it's perfectly appropriate for the context it was taken for. I used to work with a runner who kept copies of that magazine in the company shitter for reading material. It's par for course.

The sexism is the re-contextualization by putting it on the cover of Newsweek along with a really fucking condescending first-name crack out of the Sound of Music.

How about a similar topless photo of Obama with a tag-line referring to him by his first name and punning off of a line from Huckleberry Finn?
Posted by: Mitch H.   2009-11-19 16:51  

#9  Palen blew this one. This does not seem sexist to me. I think she's putting other photographers on notice not to breach their contract.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2009-11-19 16:16  

#8  Like 2008 wasn't one long Obama wet dream courtesy of the mass media.
Posted by: ed   2009-11-19 16:15  

#7  I know, lets just elect the hottest chick we can find, makes sense......

Makes a lot more sense than electing the biggest traitor/neo-fascist we can find.
Posted by: AlanC   2009-11-19 15:32  

#6  I know, lets just elect the hottest chick we can find, makes sense......
Posted by: 746   2009-11-19 15:29  

#5  Nice legs.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-11-19 13:32  

#4  Pretty good judo.

Breach of contract, out of context, extra publicity, newspeak is doing her favors. Photographer contacted immediately after the Runner's World release tells me they thought this picture would be a some sort or ruiner, but its a great photo.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-11-19 12:46  

#3  This is Phase IV in the New Media Model for propping up an insupportable argument-- in this case, the MSM mantra that Obama is somehow other than a lightweight BS artist who's totally out of his depth and whose presidency is failing on every single domestic and f-p front.

Phase I: dismiss facts out of hand

Phase II: dispute facts

Phase III: accept facts but make excuses

Phase IV: abandon argument altogether, then change the subject. Palin! Levi!
Posted by: lex   2009-11-19 10:37  

#2  if she calles it sexist, why did she pose for it. Not to mention all the beauty contests she was entered in during her earlier years, are these sexist as well, I think describing her as an idiot twit (twot) would be falling short of the mark.
Posted by: 746   2009-11-19 10:31  

#1  What's the big deal? This photograph is tastefully done. It is not p0rn. Do you suppose there might be a little catiness and envy going on in the donk corp and donk media?
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-11-19 10:15  

00:00