You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Obama meets Hu, says Tibet part of China
2009-11-18
Describing Tibet as part of China, US President Barack Obama today supported the early resumption of talks between Beijing and representatives of the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader Dalai Lama.

"We did note that while we recognise that Tibet is part of the People's Republic of China, the United States supports the early resumption of dialogue" between the Dalai Lama's representatives and Beijing," Obama said after his meeting with Chinese counterpart Hu Jintao.

Chinese President Hu Jintao hailed US President Barack Obama's recognition of sovereignty issues dear to China. "China approves of President Obama's repeated reiteration of the one-China principle," Hu told reporters.

Hu referred to China's "sovereignty over Taiwan and other matters" during a state visit in which some Western analysts had predicted that China would also demand an explicit declaration by Washington of China's sovereignty over the restive frontier regions of Tibet and Xinjiang.

Washington switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei, capital of self-ruled Taiwan, to Beijing in 1979 but remains the island's main arms supplier.

Obama did not meet Tibet's exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, when he was in Washington in early October. But the Dalai Lama has said they may meet after Obama returns from China, which condemns the Buddhist monk as a separatist for demanding Tibetan self-determination.

China, which has governed Tibet since its troops occupied the territory in the 1950s, has repeatedly accused the Dalai Lama of leading a campaign to split the Himalayan region from the rest of the country.

The 74-year-old Dalai Lama, who fled to India amid a failed uprising against Chinese rule in 1959, has denied the allegations.

The last formal talks between the Dalai Lama's envoys and Chinese officials, the seventh since 2002, ended in an impasse in July last year, with China demanding that he prove that he did not support Tibetan independence.

Relations have been particularly tense this year after large scale riots in Lhasa, Tibet's capital, in which hundreds of shops were torched and Chinese civilians were attacked.
Posted by:Fred

#22  DAILYNEWS.PK > OBAMA [desires] TO END AFGHAN WAR BEFORE LEAVING OFFICE.

and

* SAME > [UN Report] TACKLING [Regional, World]POPULATION RISE WILL FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE, espec pesky greenhouse gas emissions = CO2.

IIUC above > SUPPOR OWG-NWO WAR IFF YOU WISH TO STOP GLOBAL WARMING = CLIMATE CHANGE. CLearly we will force the Sun to surrender by NOT atackin', invading it.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-11-18 22:20  

#21  ION TOPIX > CHATHAM HOUSE: TURKEY AND RUSSIA COULD FORM "ALLIANCE OF THE EXCLUDED" IN EURASIA; + ROBERT WAXLER: THE US IS INTERESTED IN THE NAGORNO-KARABAKH AND TURKEY-ARMENIA PROCESSES + CHECHNYA CONFLICT, UZBEK MILITANTS SHOW RUSSIA HAS NOT DEFERATED INSURGENTS.

* WAFF > [DAILYNEWS.PK OpEd] PAKISTANI WRITER: "WE ARE A NATION OF BEGGARS/BEGGING WITH DIGNITY.

Also from DAILYNEWS.PK OPED: GUERILLA WARFARE.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-11-18 22:13  

#20  Oh, and another day and counting without an announced Afghan policy.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-11-18 15:26  

#19  Can't disagree with ya there Grunt, but what the administration can do is cease public and weapon support, or exit the navy from the theatre. And I'm sure India is just thrilled about unchecked expansion into Tibet, nevermind the Tibetans.

And yes, China is expanding into Africa, and there is no public objection (or hardly even notice of) to that either.

Sorry, sometimes I forget the game plan is the post-american world.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-11-18 15:17  

#18  Actually the official US policy is that while we consider Tibet part of the PRC, we encourage the PRC to respect the rights of the Tibetans.

US policy on Taiwan is similar. However, Taiwan is lucrative to us from a weapons sale standpoint.

That's why we (and the PRC) blocked Taiwan from becoming a member of the UN.

There are plenty of other reasons to dislike Obama rather than his China policy. Move on folks, there is nothing new to see here.

If you really want to be scared of China, take a visit to Africa and count the number of Chinese MAMs (military aged males). They are securing the natural resources there without firing a shot.
Posted by: Grunt_0369   2009-11-18 14:01  

#17  Called it, trading Tibet for favors. Watch out Taiwan, US Gov has a Christmas list to consider.

Super Power Credits - Activate!
Form of...a nanny!
Form of...a map!
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-11-18 11:20  

#16  O?no!
Posted by: whatadeal   2009-11-18 10:17  

#15  Is there anyone Obama won't sell downriver?
Yes:
-the SEIU
-the UAW
-Government Sachs partners
-Oogo, Fidel, Ortega et al.
Posted by: lex   2009-11-18 10:16  

#14  Is there anyone Obama won't sell downriver?
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-11-18 07:05  

#13  US Presidents never conceded that Tibet was part of China. Till Obama

um...what?
Posted by: Shuper Bonaparte1737   2009-11-18 07:01  

#12  US Presidents never conceded that the Baltic countries were part of the USSR. US Presidents never conceded that Tibet was part of China. Till Obama - what a tool!
Posted by: DMFD   2009-11-18 06:55  

#11  #8 Only three more years of this retarded hyperactive bull running around in the china shop. I wonder what's next.
Posted by gorb


If we are lucky, hard times. If we are not so lucky, chaos and anarchy.
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-11-18 06:47  

#10  So, will China buy any more US Tresury bills now?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-11-18 06:03  

#9  Maybe he thinks China will help him with the nuclear issue from now on.
Posted by: gorb   2009-11-18 04:21  

#8  Only three more years of this retarded hyperactive bull running around in the china shop. I wonder what's next.
Posted by: gorb   2009-11-18 04:20  

#7  This is merely a reiteration of US Government policy, which has recognised Tibet as a part of China for decades, even before the PRC existed.
Posted by: Shuper Bonaparte1737   2009-11-18 04:05  

#6  Pay no attention to the little clown behind the curtain-- the one who comes up with gems like:

"A united world defeated communism."

"No nation can or should dominate another."

Zionism resulted from the holocaust.

Posted by: lex   2009-11-18 03:06  

#5  Alaska Paul nails it.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2009-11-18 03:05  

#4  He has a sense of history from the communist point of view.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2009-11-18 02:50  

#3  This Prez has absolutely NO historical sense. Someomne should brief him on the events in 1959...
Posted by: borgboy   2009-11-18 01:21  

#2  Next year San Francisco.
Posted by: ed   2009-11-18 01:18  

#1  Obama has this thing for 4wheel drive buses to throw his supporters under.
Posted by: 3dc   2009-11-18 00:12  

00:00