Submit your comments on this article |
Economy |
Do Dodd or Frank care why TARP failed? |
2009-10-29 |
![]() Are the two men in Congress most responsible for overseeing TARP ready to clean up the mess? There is no way of knowing because they won't say. The Examiner got no response from spokesmen for either Senate banking committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., or House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass. We asked if they have read the damning GAO report and if they plan to do anything in response to it's central finding. Their silence comes as no surprise since Dodd and Frank voted for TARP and were members of the bipartisan congressional chorus that joined President Bush and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson last year in warning of economic collapse if the program wasn't approved. Now, when GAO issues a report that says it could find no evidence that TARP made one iota of difference to the ultimate outcome of the economic crisis of 2008, Dodd and Frank don't seem interested in talking about it. Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., who voted against TARP, pointed out at during a September banking committee hearing that TARP morphed from a targeted program designed solely to purchase toxic assets and unfreeze credit markets to a free-for-all bailout of auto companies, delinquent homeowners, and practically anybody else with an itchy palm. Meanwhile, hardworking taxpayers who are stuck with the bill watch in disbelief as the value of their homes and dollars dribble away and foreclosures mount to record levels. Those who like Shelby opposed TARP have been vindicated. During the September hearing, Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky blamed a continuing lack of transparency and accountability for the public's "anger, cynicism and distrust" of federal bailouts. Taxpayers should be infuriated by this colossal waste of their hard-earned money and the failure of Dodd and Frank to get to the bottom of why it happened. |
Posted by:Fred |
#6 Your rent-seeking classes don't think the TARP failed. You want to "force" them to drink a lower quality Champagne? Some of the bond-holding classes might even have to leave their trust-fund existence and work! Whilst your working half your time for the state you can smile because someone is enjoying themselves. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2009-10-29 15:58 |
#5 Short answer: NO. That's because it is about the death of the greenback (see article above, although he solely blames Bush and 8 years of war). The Cloward-Piven strategy calls for trashing the economy so it can be "transformed". Frank-ly, they are just Dodd-ering fools that know not what they do. |
Posted by: Lumpy Elmoluck5091 2009-10-29 14:00 |
#4 Short answer: NO. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2009-10-29 09:58 |
#3 Do Dodd or Frank care There, fixed it for you. |
Posted by: AlanC 2009-10-29 09:39 |
#2 The GAO misses the point. It was about keeping Big Donors(c) liquid enough to sustain incumbent reelection funds. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2009-10-29 08:20 |
#1 Dodd & Frank. Who said that, `The Corsican Brothers` wasn't about real people? |
Posted by: BigEd 2009-10-29 00:29 |