You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
UN investigator warns US on use of drones
2009-10-28
Posted by:tipper

#24  This moderator thinks silentbrick's suggestion is an excellent idea.
Posted by: Scooter McGruder   2009-10-28 22:06  

#23  ION PAKISTANI DEFENCE FORUM > US RETREATS AS TALIBAN TAKE OVER AFGHAN PROVINCE [Nuristan].

POSTER > USA = US-ALLIES cannot win the war from the air [drones], as it is mainly a FOOT-SOLDIERS' WAR.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2009-10-28 20:38  

#22  Receiving warnings from the UN are we? This is the first positive news we've seen lately! Our UAS programe must surely be effective.
Posted by: Besoeker    2009-10-28 18:21  

#21  "killing at least seven people including three U.N. staff, officials said. A Taliban spokesman claimed responsibility"

In other words, red on red.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2009-10-28 18:18  

#20  Since they accuse of all these horrible things, we might as well do them and get the job done. It'll be over far more quickly and it'd be a permanent solution to the problem.

From the game of Paranoia, comes the right saying for this problem.

"Vapors don't shoot back"
Posted by: Silentbrick   2009-10-28 17:34  

#19  The Goldstone thing really went to their heads.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-28 16:12  

#18  The primary objection of the UN seems to be that it's effective. Their thought process seems to be "Let's get those US troops out there where they can get killed. Maybe they'll get sick of it before they get around to us"
Posted by: Mercutio   2009-10-28 15:49  

#17  Can we start with the Turtle Bay first?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-10-28 15:43  

#16  Why yes! Yes, I *am* trying to destroy your liver. It is kind of you to notice.
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-10-28 15:26  

#15  Maybe we could launch arc lights from Q-ships off the coast, and stealth in with mini nukes?
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-10-28 15:25  

#14  Attention mods: How many drinks does Silentbrick's post call for? Dr. Steve: How much is a liver transplant, just in case?
Posted by: Grunter   2009-10-28 14:56  

#13  My vote is arclight strikes using nukes. Bring back the mininukes and drop however many a B-52 can hold in a nice pattern over an area. Then repeat when the UN inspectors go in to investigate.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2009-10-28 13:28  

#12  Perhaps the UN wants us to revert to this:

Works for me...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2009-10-28 12:47  

#11  Perhaps the UN wants us to revert to this:





(Dresden)
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-10-28 12:41  

#10  Its interesting the UN waited this long to bring this up. They had years to address it under Bush - but they knew he'd tell them to go pound sand. The UN sees Obama's weakness and will try to capitalize on it even more.
Posted by: Yosemtie Sam   2009-10-28 12:36  

#9  Maybe the UN wants the USA to revert to that
Posted by: Willy   2009-10-28 12:05  

#8   To the the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions:

What about that?


Gunmen attacked a guest house used by U.N. staff in the Afghan capital of Kabul early Wednesday, killing at least seven people including three U.N. staff, officials said. A Taliban spokesman claimed responsibility, saying it was meant as an assault on the upcoming presidential election.

Posted by: Willy   2009-10-28 11:47  

#7  SteveS, if it is an MQ-9 Reaper instead of an MQ-1B Predator on the combat air patrol, you don't have to choose. You can be killed by an AGM-114 Hellfire missile, a GBU-12 laser guided bomb, or a GBU-38 JDAM. The Reaper can carry 3,000 pounds of ordinance on the wings and deliver it with precision, panache, and pleasure.
Posted by: rwv   2009-10-28 11:29  

#6  Again with the "International Law" crap. Yo, Einstein - it doesn't exist! Certainly the thugs and thieves that make up the UN have no laws.
Posted by: mojo   2009-10-28 11:08  

#5  VDH is smarter than your average bear :)
Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007   2009-10-28 11:01  

#4  This is what we get for trying to limit bloodshed instead of doing arclight strikes.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2009-10-28 10:33  

#3  I'm having trouble seeing the difference between sending a Hellfire thru the window via a drone vs dropping a 250 lb bomb on the roof with a plane.

I am also having trouble seeing the usefulness of the UN, but that is rant for another thread.
Posted by: SteveS   2009-10-28 10:21  

#2  
Personally, if I were a terrorist suspect, IÂ’d rather be picked up by a Special Forces team in the Hindu Kush, be shipped to Cuba, have my case reviewed by military lawyers, be allowed a Middle Eastern diet, and be provided with a Koran and arrows pointing to Mecca than simply wait to have my head exploded without warning by a Hellfire missile, while sitting inside my mud-brick hideout in Waziristan alongside my soon-to-be-incinerated family.

Victor Davis Hanson
Posted by: Parabellum   2009-10-28 09:51  

#1  I'm surprised this hasn't happened earlier. The drones are an assassination program.
Posted by: phil_b   2009-10-28 08:55  

00:00