You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Russia Resists U.S. Position on Sanctions for Iran
2009-10-15
MOSCOW -- Denting President Obama's hopes for a powerful ally in his campaign to press Iran on its nuclear program, Russia's foreign minister said Tuesday that threatening Tehran now with harsh new sanctions would be "counterproductive."
It isn't that Bambi and Hilde got played, it's how easily ...
The minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, said after meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton here that diplomacy should be given a chance to work, particularly after a meeting in Geneva this month in which the Iranian government said it would allow United Nations inspectors to visit its clandestine nuclear enrichment site near the holy city of Qum.

"At the current stage, all forces should be thrown at supporting the negotiating process," he said. "Threats, sanctions and threats of pressure in the current situation, we are convinced, would be counterproductive."

Mr. Lavrov's resistance was striking given that, just three weeks before, President Dmitri A. Medvedev said that "in some cases, sanctions are inevitable." American officials had hailed that statement as a sign that Russia was finally coming around to the Obama administration's view that Iran is best handled with diplomacy backed by a credible threat of sanctions.

It also came after the Obama administration announced that it would retool a European missile defense system fiercely opposed by Russia. That move was thought to have paid dividends for the White House when Mr. Medvedev appeared to throw his support behind Mr. Obama on Iran, though American officials say the Russian president was also likely to have been reacting to the disclosure of the secret nuclear site near Qum.
Nice going Bambi, we sure got a lot out of the Rooskies for having hung the Poles and Czechs out to dry ...
Posted by:Steve White

#8  I don't understand much, that I'll acknowledge readily, but you do justify their position. Why don't you do the same for the paleos? For the EUcrats? For iran? All actually have justifiable reasons (if only to them) to base their actions on. Why only take the time for russia, instead of lumping them with the EU?
Posted by: anonymous5089   2009-10-15 15:45  

#7  A5089, I guess you don't understand the difference between explaining the facts of somebody's position and justifyig it.

Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-15 15:20  

#6  Hum, Grumpy G(r)om, agreed on the rationalizations, though I did express myself badly : you're all set to find excuse for russia being blantantly your country's ennemy, because, AFAIK, you've got an hard-on (excuse my french) for Motherland - just like many euro wingnuts, by the way.
This was not really relevant to iran, actually, I was just wondering if you'd find the same kind of "attenuating circumstances" to Europe, somehow excusing its actions by pointing out its own interests and its blindspots and all, but that was mostly rethorical.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2009-10-15 15:05  

#5  Europeans, nothing could be simpler.
They don't call it Eurabia for nothing, and Iran makes Arabs very nervous.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-15 14:45  

#4  Nice set of rationalizations; could you do the same for the europeans??? Just asking.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2009-10-15 10:45  

#3  
(1) Russians like selling weapons---it makes them feel they haven't, quite, descended to the level of being totally dependent on their oil exports.
(2) Since they are totally dependent on their oil exports, they like troubles in ME = rise in the price of oil.
(3) Russia sees Iran as strategic partner---the way USA sees Saudia (and with the same inability to see the drawbacks).
(4)Russians really, really hate Saudia for inciting & financing Jihad in Russia and its "near abroad".
(5) Russians really despise Obama---and the country which elected him.
(i)The contempt of old KGB grads like Putin & Co to western left has no bounds.
(ii) Russia on race is where USA was in 1920.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-10-15 03:44  

#2  It's merely a public display of the intellectual supremecy Russia has over the 5th graders running our government.

Too bad noob presidents like Noobama get to pick their own advisors. Might not hurt to have a few more experienced advisors from previous administrations laying around. The russians have had their leadership in place for years, so they're going to play the noobs for chumps every time.
Posted by: gorb   2009-10-15 01:36  

#1  It's merely a public display of the intellectual supremecy Russia has over the 5th graders running our government.

I would have paid to listen to my KGB mirror laugh at Hillary at her speech. Russians are well studied and know more about our country than we do. They certainly know more about our Constitution. They are like a cat playing with a mouse. Their stature shall begin to build and build fast as ours diminish.

Good job America, you destroyed yourself on foolish notions that Russians used to have which they promised to bury US with.

Prophetic.
Posted by: newc   2009-10-15 00:24  

00:00