You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
IT'S RIO! - Blame it on Bush Rio
2009-10-02
COPENHAGEN -- Finally, South America gets an Olympics. The 2016 Games are going to Rio de Janeiro.

In a vote of high drama, the bustling Brazilian carnival city of beaches, mountains and samba beat surprise finalist Madrid, which got a big helping hand from a very influential friend.

Chicago was knocked out in the first round -- in one of the most shocking defeats ever handed down by the International Olympic Committee. Even Tokyo, which had trailed throughout the race, did better -- eliminated after Chicago in the second round.

Rio spoke to IOC members' consciences: the city argued that it was simply unfair that South America has never hosted the games, while Europe, Asia and North America have done so repeatedly.

"It is a time to address this imbalance," Brazil's charismatic president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, told the IOC's members before they voted. "It is time to light the Olympic cauldron in a tropical country."

The bearded former union leader disappeared into a huge group hug with the joyous Rio team after IOC president Jacques Rogge announced that the city won. Football great Pele had tears in his eyes.

Madrid's surprising success in reaching the final round came after former IOC president Juan Antonio Samaranch made an unusual appeal for the Spanish capital, reminding the IOC's members as he asked for their vote that, at age 89, "I am very near the end of my time."

Samaranch ran the IOC for 21 years before Rogge took over in 2001.

Chicago had long been seen as a front-runner and got the highest possible level of support -- from President Barack Obama himself. But he only spent a few hours in the Danish capital where the vote was held and left before the result was announced.

Former IOC member Kai Holm said that the brevity of his appearance may have counted against him. The short stopover was "too business-like," Holm said. "It can be that some IOC members see it as a lack of respect."

Senior Australian IOC member Kevan Gosper surmised that Asian voters may have banded together for Tokyo in the first round, at Chicago's expense. "I'm shocked," Gosper said. "The whole thing doesn't make sense other than there has been a stupid bloc vote."

He worried that the shock exit could do "untold damage" to the already testy relations between the IOC and the U.S. Olympic Committee. They had recent flare-ups over revenue sharing and a USOC TV network.

"To have the president of the United States and his wife personally appear, then this should happen in the first round is awful and totally undeserving," Gosper said.

The European-dominated IOC's last two experiences in the United States were bad: the 2002 Salt Lake City Winter Olympics were sullied by a bribery scandal and logistical problems and a bombing hit the 1996 Games in Atlanta.

Obama had held out the enticing prospect of a Chicago games helping to reconnect the United States with the world after the presidency of George W. Bush. He told the IOC earlier Friday that the "full force of the White House" would be applied so "visitors from all around the world feel welcome and will come away with a sense of the incredible diversity of the American people."

Now, Chicago can only rue what might have been. And Obama's gamble of expending his own political capital on the bid backfired.

The last U.S. city to bid for the Summer Games, New York, did scarcely better. It was ousted in the second round in the 2005 vote that gave the 2012 Games to London.

Tokyo did better than many expected by reaching the second round. It had offered reassurances of financial security, with $4 billion already banked for the games. But the fact that the Olympics were held only last year in Asia, in Beijing, handicapped the Japanese capital's bid.

Its plans for a highly compact games, sparing athletes tiring travel by holding all but the shooting within 8 kilometers (5 miles) of the city center, were technically appealing. But the bid failed to generate real enthusiasm, even in Japan. Tokyo had the lowest public backing in IOC polls, with 55 percent of residents supporting the bid and 7.8 percent strongly opposed.

Tokyo's final presentation Friday to the IOC, while smooth and heartfelt, lacked the buzz that the Obamas and Rio generated. In short, Tokyo was simply overshadowed, failing to convince IOC members that it really wanted or needed the games.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#15  The reason why Chicago's bid was doomed.

A fight over money.
Posted by: phil_b   2009-10-02 18:28  

#14  And congrats to Brazil and the people of Rio.

Posted by: BrerRabbit   2009-10-02 17:27  

#13  The IOC just saved the Chicago taxpayers, the taxpayers of the State of Illinois and in the end everyone one of us federal taxpayers a fortune.

I thank them.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2009-10-02 17:26  

#12  "I'm still in a state of shock. I can't believe we couldn't get past the first round. I still thought the (Chicago) bid overall was the best," said three-time Olympic gold medalist swimmer Ambrose "Rowdy" Gaines.

"Maybe there is some hangover from politics, from the last eight years," Gaines said.

Hitler won Germany the Olympics. Bushitler cost America the Olympics. It all makes sense.

Steyn at NRO's corner
Posted by: Beavis   2009-10-02 17:07  

#11  Oh dear. What are their slumlord friends gonna do with all that property they were hoping to remodel/resell?
Posted by: Cornsilk Blondie   2009-10-02 16:59  

#10  Obama and Michelle needed this lesson to let them know they aren't the King and Queen of the universe.
I am sure he is pouting when he doesn't get his way he's a crybaby. Things are turning against him steadily, time he opened his eyes to see his CHANGE is not at all what people thought it would be. And his own change seems to be changing his mind every day on things he stated while campaigning hard to believe anything he says.
Posted by: JJJohnson   2009-10-02 16:04  

#9  And the procession to the stadium more interesting than a computer simulation of firework footprints.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2009-10-02 15:08  

#8  Top 10 Reasons Chicago Didn't Get the Olympics [Rich Lowry]
An e-mail:

10. Dead people can't vote at IOC meetings
9. Obama distracted by 25 min meeting with Gen. McChrystal
8. Who cares if Obama couldn't talk the IOC into Chicago? He'll be able to talk Iran out of nukes.
7. The impediment is Israel still building settlements.
6. Obviously no president would have been able to acomplish it.
5. We've been quite clear and said all along that we didn't want the Olympics.
4. This isn't about the number of Olympics "lost", it's about the number of Olympics "saved" or "created".
3. Clearly not enough wise Latina judges on the committee
2. Because the IOC is racist.
1. It's George Bush's fault.
Posted by: Beavis   2009-10-02 14:55  

#7  Wait until the Olympic tourists get a chance to experience Rio's crime problems. Although I have to admit the idea of the women on Rio's beaches is a hell of a lot more enjoyable than the women on Chicago's
Posted by: Cheaderhead   2009-10-02 14:50  

#6  Has Michelle threatened to shove tennis balls down the IOC's collective throat yet?
Posted by: Woozle Uneter9007   2009-10-02 14:39  

#5  But he only spent a few hours in the Danish capital where the vote was held and left before the result was announced.

???? What was the purpose of wasting all those tax dollars with 2 planes on 2 separate days?????
Posted by: Lumpy Elmoluck5091   2009-10-02 14:27  

#4  OBama's incapable of "Learning" from any past "White Man's" troubles.

He's a racist pue and simple "Black good, White bad"

Yes I hear the sheeps chorus here, "White Baaaad"
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-10-02 14:05  

#3  Epic fail. EPIC fail. Epic, memorable, once-in-a-lifetime you'll-tell-the-grandkids-about-it fail!

There's actually something worrisome about this whole Chicago fiasco, and it goes back to President Obama's inexperience. Diplomacy 101 tells us that your head of state only shows up on the high-profile stage when a deal is complete. The lesson that most politicians learn well before they gain positions of power is that diplomacy is done by diplomats, professionals who work through all the negotiations and the hardball tactics and the carrot/stick combinations. The principals in the matter gather to discuss high-level topics and to smile for the cameras as the agreement is being signed. Heads of state do not conduct diplomacy, they ratify it, and surprises are entirely unwelcome at those summits and signing events (hence Reagan's anger in Iceland.)

Why were you and Ramesh surprised? Because you thought that President Obama at least knew this very basic lesson. Today's announcement suggests that he does not, and it just got advertised big-time to countries who already were pretty sure we had a rookie at the helm who didn't know how to use international power. President Obama just got upstaged by an organization against whom no retaliation is acceptable, and he wants to meet with the Iranians next month? We are in deep, deep trouble.

--a reader of Jim Geraghty's "Campaign Spot" blog at NR
Posted by: Mike   2009-10-02 13:57  

#2  Obama had held out the enticing prospect of a Chicago games helping to reconnect the United States with the world after the presidency of George W. Bush.

The Karma of this is just too delicious for words. How's that "Blame Bush" gig working out for you?
Posted by: Frozen Al   2009-10-02 13:40  

#1  IOC bigwigs gonna miss out on "Leon's BBQ" - the best rib tips in the world!
Posted by: borgboy   2009-10-02 13:38  

00:00