You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
September 11th in a 9/10 world
2009-09-11
I sometimes stop what I'm doing and wonder what Gary Condit's doing these days.

I don't particularly care, mind you, but Gary Condit epitomized the 9/10 mentality, lo, those eight long years ago. Those were the days when The Gray Davis was running Caliphornia into the ground -- not quite as deeply as today, but continuing a process that had been under way for years and years. Caliphornia then was what Caliphornia looked like going under. Caliphornia today is what Caliphornia looks like when it's bankrupt.

There had been a spate of shark attacks in the water, and on land Terry McAuliff was about to go on the offensive against the young administration of G.W. Bush. But The Case Of The Missing Mistress was kind of the synopsis of the first eight months of 2001. And Condit, despite his statement that his wife had no thumbs, turned out not to be the one that dunnit.

It's a "post-9/11" world now. The anger, the fury, the desire for the murderers' blood has long since subsided, not by that very November as Mickey Kaus had predicted, but by the next November in fact. The usual suspects rallied their forces with demonstrations and propaganda and charges of "permanent war." Iraq was invaded and Saddam Hussein ejected in an attempt to bring a stable democratic state to the heart of the Muddle East that may pay off years from now or never. Cindy Sheehan rose and fell. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi rose and fell. Shamil Basayev fell. Michael Moore remains, as large as ever.
Larger, I think, and the increase doesn't appear to be slowing.
Fidel Castro -- approximately 186 years old -- remains. Charlie Rangel remains.

The bravery of the men of Flight 93 has been forgotten. The gallantry of NYPD and FDNY have been misplaced. They were an aberration in a world where little boys are to be turned into little girls so they won't be threatening when they grow up.
At least in the view of those who get paid to tell us what to think.
G.W. Bush has retired to Crawford. Karl Rove can sometimes be seen on Fox News and writes op-ed pieces for the Wall Street Journal. Dick Cheney keeps up the good fight even as the new president's minions try to find some way to run show trials with him playing the part of Louis XVI. Guantanamo is in the process of closing. The al-Qaeda prisoners have been dusted off and sent back to their countries of origin, a hefty percentage of them returning to the fight. Missile defense is being traded away for a mess of pottage.

We haven't won the war on terror. The Obama administration tries to pretend it's not there anymore. His Excellency was against the Iraq war, wanting to shut it down, pointing to Afghanistan as "the good war" that he'd pursue to the bitter end, "going after" al-Qaeda. Now the calls are coming for withdrawal, since we've come up with some convoluted rules of engagement, a "surge" that's not
yet...
working the way the Iraqi surge was, and the casualties are going up as our troops engage more closely under worse conditions with the enemy.

Osama bin Laden's still there. He has a base, probably in scenic Chitral, that he goes to when he's not traveling to more civilized parts. Ayman al-Zawahiri's still there. He lives in North Wazoo. Mullah Omar's still there. He lives in Quetta and operates in Kandahar and adjacent areas. Jalaluddin Haqqani's still there. He lives in South Wazoo and operates in Paktika. Gulbuddin Hekmatyar's still there. He lives in the Pak tribal area in comfortable circumstances and every once in awhile he rockets Kabul, just like in the old days.

A few days ago Binny promised a "gift to the Muslims." That sort of thing usually involves corpses in Islamic parlance.

Today's 9/11. It's also the anniversary of 9/11/2001. It's the anniversary of the Battle of Vienna where the Grand Turk was sent packing in the wake of the largest cavalry charge in history. Jan Sobieski zhil, zhivet, budet zhit'.
(translation, please, for those of us who don't speak Russian... or Polish.)
Sorry. It's a play on a Communist party slogan, maybe first spun by Mayakovsky: "Lenin lived, lives, will live."
3000 died in the attack eight years ago, the combined casualties of New York, Pennsylvania, and the Pentagon. We've lost about 5000 dead in Iraq and Afghanistan: 4337 in Iraq, 716 in Afghanistan, the figures current as of about a week ago. In 1683 the Turks lost 15,000 dead and wounded at the Gates of Vienna, plus 5,000 captured, compared to 4,500 dead and wounded for the Habsburg-Polish forces. There are those who would tell us today that 4500 dead and wounded is too high a price to pay for freedom. They're the same ones who'll tell us that 5000 dead is too high a price.

Al-Qaeda hasn't folded its tent. They want to kill as many of us as possible. There will be another attack. Probably Binny and Ayman will try to outdo their last attack. We'll see if those dead and wounded are a high enough price to pay for freedom.
There will be another attack indeed. And it may well come across the border with Venezuelan passports handed out in Teheran. Or not. The opportunities are many.

Meanwhile the One is going to the UN to propose we disarm, starting with our nuclear arsenal, right about the time the Iranian program hits the tipping point. I've buried a few friends and colleagues these last 8 years who were wearing uniforms when they died. And I wonder if there is enough left of the center of our country to be worth their sacrifices.

I know the principles they protected are - but principles alone do not a country make. It takes citizens who uphold and defend them to make a country. And to do that they have to turn off Britney and Michael and stop drinking the Kool Aid ... or ingesting the pap dished out by the media. How many are left? Enough, perhaps, but only if we rouse ourselves.
I wonder sometimes if we have fallen victim to our own successes. We've had some. We helped the Northern Alliance take back Afghanistan from the Taliban with only a few casualties to our Special Forces. We threw Saddam Hussein out in a campaign that, despite the loss of 4337 of our finest, has cost us in lives less than a tenth of what the Progressive Left claimed -- and hoped -- it would. Even today in Afghanistan we use a fraction of our available military power.

We've thwarted terrorist attacks around the world, many times very quietly. We haven't issued press releases on some of our most notable successes. If you only read the New York Times the only news you'd read would be the failures and the leaks. But the men and women who take security very seriously, and there are still many, have done their jobs.

We're safe. We're secure. For now. We've forgotten the hollow feeling in our guts that we had on 9/12, wondering when -- not if -- the terrorists would strike again. Wondering how many more of our own people would jump out of burning buildings. How much we'd have to change our society and forsake both comfort and freedom to stop a remorseless enemy.

Truth is, we haven't sacrificed much as a nation. For all the howling of the Progressive Left, the average American is as free and comfortable today as he was on 9/10. The TSA is an annoyance. The blabbermouths on cable news are an annoyance. We're right back to worrying about health care, the usual political corruption and Jocko. We're as free and satisfied as ever.

We're victims of our own success. I suppose that guarantees that we'll be victims of another kind again someday.
May Providence watch over us all, so long as that man remains in the White House.
Posted by:Fred

#21  I can't comment!

I think all actions since 9/11 have been done ridiculously kid gloves.
Posted by: 3dc   2009-09-11 22:27  

#20  [funky skunk has been pooplisted.]

I suspect you'll have company before the end of the year.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-09-11 21:32  

#19  Let's also take a moment to remember the lives lost in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Posted by: Snakes Uleatch3623   2009-09-11 20:11  

#18  Never forgive, never forget.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2009-09-11 17:55  

#17  Not a monarchy, Mr. Carville. I think what Obama has in mind is more like the dictatorship of the proletariat.

I think DV's vision of Obama leaving the White House with his tail between his legs is the best possible outcome...that includes the hope that he doesn't demoralize and defang the military and other security services to the point where we do get hit again.

Many thanks to Fred and the other mods for maintaining Rantburg. I'm afraid there's a lot of darkness out there so it's nice to have a few lights on.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2009-09-11 14:53  

#16  They hate us. No amount of apologist foreign policy will change that.

They have hated us for almost 900 years. They hated us before the Vienna Woods, they hated us before we sack Jerusalem.

They hated us before they saddled their first camel and sacked their first village on the Arabian peninsula.

We are infidels and apostates. We are to be either converted or massacred. Plain and simple, we are hated by their theology.

I turn on the television everyday expecting to find out that one of our cities has disappeared. And when that happens, BO will wring his hands, lecture us about how it is Bush's fault that they hate us and then he will declare martial law and take away everything resimbling a civil right.

I think he wants us to be hit again so he can turn us into a monarchy.
Posted by: James Carville   2009-09-11 13:55  

#15  -- I still switch on my TV every morning in the hope that something like 9/11 has not just occurred again.
--- I have gotten a whole lot better at scanning the internet for relevant news whether or not the MSM sees fit to publish it, many thanks to Rantburg.
---- I don't think average Americans are as comfortable as they were on 9/10 -- the economic downtown's pain is spreading and intensifying.
--- This is increasing dissatisfaction & distrust of our political authorities. Rep. Wilson's recent outburst during O's speech to Congress probably served as a valuable safety valve to relieve some of that pressure.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2009-09-11 13:11  

#14  We could redefine success to mean that he kept us safe abroad and at home, and otherwise did not achieve any of his objectives... It is starting to look like President Obama may have run out of steam on the domestic side -- the tea partiers have caught everyone's attention, no matter how much the interested parties are fussing, but those charged with keeping us safe keep beavering away at the task, as do those liberal hawk listed above in other countries.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-09-11 12:14  

#13  LH, we do NOT want a "successful" Obama presidency. It sets far too many policies in stone that are harmful to this nation. Obama must fail if our nation is to remain strong. We see the type of government Obama wants to foist on the United States, and it's the same dreary crap that is killing Europe.

What I want is a nation that turns back to its roots, that cuts the fraud, waste, and abuse of Congress to a trickle, that offers the opportunity for success without Government constantly looking over our shoulders. I want a government that recognizes and PROTECTS the rights of its citizens, both those enumerated in the Bill of Rights and those that exist, sometimes recognized, sometimes not, in common law. I DON'T want a nation where the Government runs one-third or more of the economy, not on sound economic principles, but upon the false belief that it's necessary to "establish stability". The only stability that exists in this world is the stability of the grave - everything else is constantly changing.

I certainly don't want a nation that is defanged, hobbled, and crippled by a legal culture that wants to force everyone to be "equal", not in opportunity, but in results. That's the world of Barrack Hussein Obama, and it's a disaster for everyone. The events of 9/11 show us there's a definite external threat, based upon the most extreme interpretations of Islam. Barrack Obama and his cohorts are an equally dangerous internal threat. Wishing them success means wishing the destruction of our individual liberty. I think you need to rethink your desires for a "successful" Obama presidency. HIS success is not in our best interest as a nation.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2009-09-11 11:57  

#12  May Providence watch over us all, so long as that man remains in the White House.

May providenec watch over us all. Period.
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-09-11 11:17  

#11  My thoughts are with everyone past and present on this meaningful and thought provoking day, just as on 11th November.

I pray that lives lost are not lives wasted and eventually we can overcome the dark cloud that descended on 11th September 2001
Posted by: Oscar   2009-09-11 11:15  

#10  Well said, as always. Thank you Fred, and the Rantburg community.
Posted by: Mike   2009-09-11 11:11  

#9  "We've thwarted terrorist attacks around the world, many times very quietly. We haven't issued press releases on some of our most notable successes. If you only read the New York Times the only news you'd read would be the failures and the leaks. But the men and women who take security very seriously, and there are still many, have done their jobs."

Yes, and that includes everyone from the CIA, FBI, CTC, DHS down to local police. But lets also recall that it very much includes MI6 and MI5, the French and German and Dutch and Italian security services. And, yes, the Indonesian and Saudi and Egyptian and Algerian and Turkish and Bosnian security services as well.
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-09-11 11:08  

#8  I hope Obama has a successful presidency.

As I hoped that George W Bush would have a successful presidency.

As I hoped the Bill Clinton would have a successful presidency.

As I hope George Herbert Walker Bush and Ronald Reagan would have successful presidencies.

I want safe,strong,prosperous, just and sustainable United States more than I want the success of any political party.

I do not see that the benefits of a "bad" party failing are ever close to the costs of harm to the republic from a failed presidency.

I would hope, that while we disagree about the benefits of particular policies, we can all agree on that.

As for why we have had no further attacks, I suggest a piece on Slate today outlining ten very different possibilities, from 9/11 being dumb luck, to AQ and other radical islamists refocusing on the "near enemy" to the notion that AQ is waiting till they can do something bigger (with WMD) to the notion that we blew them away in October/November 2001, to Iraqi flypaper, to our loyal American Muslim community helping, etc, etc. I think there is SOME truth to all of those.

We SHOULD be debating health care, Jocko, whatever. After all, isnt the functioning of our democracy, and of our free and sometimes trivial culture, exactly what the Salifist-Jihadists were trying to destroy?

I would quibble with considering all our sacrifices in terms only of liberty losses (which I agree, have been very limited) Our sacrifices include the economic expenditures on two wars AND on homeland security (even if we have tried to avoid paying those costs). The biggest sacrifices have been borne by the men and women of our armed forces - killed, wounded, handicapped, or just deployed in horrible conditions for long times away from their families. The sacrifice has been too concentrated on too few - that doesn't mean it has not been all too real.
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-09-11 11:06  

#7  Remember this?
Posted by: badanov   2009-09-11 10:26  

#6  [funky skunk has been pooplisted.]
Posted by: funky skunk   2009-09-11 10:05  

#5  Well said Fred...That grim day had a positive outcome...you launched the 'Burg!

Deepest Regards from Kabul to you and your Staff!
Posted by: Janos Hunyadi   2009-09-11 09:32  

#4  "We want him humiliated, broken and proven to be worse than Carter. We want him leaving the White House with his tail between his legs. We want want his theories to be proven to be naive and dangerous. We want him rendered politically null and void..."

I want him to be a laughing-stock - I want to hear people giggling whenever his name is mentioned - or any lines from his speeches or his memoirs quoted. And I want that to go on for a long, long, long time, to the very end of his natural days.
Posted by: Sgt. Mom   2009-09-11 08:48  

#3  We don't want Obama assassinated. He would be another JFK and put on a pedestal and his corrupt and destructive policies could never be questioned again. He would be the left's rallying call.

We want him humiliated, broken and proven to be worse than Carter. We want him leaving the White House with his tail between his legs. We want want his theories to be proven to be naive and dangerous. We want him rendered politically null and void.

I can only hope that the CIA and the military keep the terrorists too damaged to mount any threat in the next 3 1/2 years. Bambi keeping the strikes up in Pakistan helps.

Eight years ago 3000 Americans died because of our leader's and our nativity about the ruthlessness of the world. Most of us learned our lesson. Some did not. Those that didn't are in power now and I pray that the lesson isn't reapplied.
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-09-11 08:02  

#2  We get the reference to Caligula, Besoeker -- and to the fact that he was assasinated within 4 years of becoming the emperor of Rome.

Do. Not. Go. There.

Not here at the Burg.

You've been warned about this, as have others. Last warning.
Posted by: lotp   2009-09-11 07:27  

#1  There is still hope Fred. As a youth, Gaius was also sent to live with his grandmother.

Posted by: Besoeker   2009-09-11 06:17  

00:00