You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Expect fraud in a budding democracy, sez Karzai
2009-09-08
Oh we do, we do ...
President Karzai hit back yesterday at critics accusing him of massive vote stealing in Afghanistan's elections, saying that fraud was to be expected in a young democracy and that he was being attacked by the US because it wanted him to be more docile.
Fraud can be expected in an established democracy, as we all know too well ...
Also to be expected in your every day established kleptocracy...
His comments coincided with reports that 800 fake polling centres turned in thousands of forged votes in an effort to boost the incumbent's share of the ballot. His confrontational stance has been interpreted as an attempt to curry favour with the Afghan people, who are often resentful of the 100,000 foreign troops on their soil. He said yesterday that it was in no one's interests for him to be an American puppet.
Though he's pretty much a puppet ...
Hey! Watch what he does when I tug on this!
He also brushed off what Abdullah Abdullah, his main presidential rival, called "state-engineered" vote-rigging and told the newspaper Le Figaro that fraud was "inevitable in a budding democracy". Dr Abdullah has warned of instability if the allegations are not addressed seriously.

Early results were supposed to have been released yesterday but that deadline was pushed back indefinitely.

Mr Karzai's comments did nothing to stop Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, raising the issue again, saying that officials must address the fraud allegations. "They've got to address any accusations out there and assure people of the legitimacy of the election," he said.

A US State Department spokesman acknowledged that there were "serious claims of fraud, and we expect them to be investigated". He noted that the electoral process had not yet run its course but added: "It's critically important that at the end of the process there's a government that the Afghan people and the international community can regard as legitimate."

Washington has been slow to respond to the call from Britain, France and Germany for an international conference on Afganistan's future. The State Department spokesman said that "if there's a conference on Afghanistan the US will come" -- though he noted that there was no shortage of existing forums for such discussions, from regular Nato conferences and the UN General Assembly to the forthcoming G20 summit in Pittsburgh.

Washington is unlikely to welcome another conference on the country's security until President Obama has decided whether to authorise a second surge to add to the 21,000 reinforcements already en route to the region. There may be no decision on such a move until November, analysts believe -- and the more doubt is cast on the election results, the tougher it will be to make the case for sending more troops.

Analysts believe that Mr Karzai, who struck pre-election deals with warlords suspected of having committed human rights atrocities or involvement in drug smuggling, would probably have won the vote even without the ballot-stuffing he is accused of. Partial results published at the weekend showed that he had almost reached the 50 per cent threshold needed to avoid a run-off, with almost three quarters of the ballots counted.

A senior Afghan security official told The Times that the biggest threat to security would be the continuation of a corruption-riddled government.
Posted by:Steve White

#2  Hell, look at all the voter fraud in our "mature" democracy.
Posted by: whitecollar redneck   2009-09-08 15:56  

#1  Besides his family has all those poppy interests that need protecting at all costs.
Posted by: 3dc   2009-09-08 00:38  

00:00