You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
ABC's Charles Gibson to Cindy Sheehan: Thanks for your sacrifice. Now get lost.
2009-08-21
Byron York
In an appearance August 18 on WLS radio in Chicago, ABC News anchor Charles Gibson was asked about anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan's plans to travel to Martha's Vineyard next week, where she will protest the Iraq and Afghanistan wars while President Obama is vacationing there. Gibson, whose newscast and network featured Sheehan when she led anti-war protests outside President Bush's Texas ranch in 2005, answered, "Enough already."

That's a remarkably different stance from the one Gibson took four years ago. On August 9, 2005, the ABC anchor conducted an extensive on-air interview with Sheehan. "Cindy Sheehan is her name," Gibson began. "She says she's not moving until the president meets with her, and I had a chance to speak with her a few minutes ago. Cindy Sheehan, bottom line, what do you hope to accomplish with all this?" During the next week, Gibson and ABC continued to cover Sheehan. On August 17, 2005, when Sheehan left Crawford, Gibson reported, "We're going to turn next to the standoff that is playing out near President Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas. Cindy Sheehan, you know, the mother who lost a son in Iraq, is now on the move, but she's still standing her ground. ABC's Geoff Morrell is in Crawford with the details..." The next day, Gibson reported, "All across the country last night, people held candlelight vigils in support of Cindy Sheehan..." Sheehan was mentioned in several other ABC newscasts, as well.

This week, after the Washington Examiner reported that Sheehan will be protesting on Martha's Vineyard (see here and here), WLS radio host Don Wade, noting all the coverage that Sheehan received in 2005, asked Gibson "whether we're going to see some coverage of Cindy Sheehan...do you suppose Cindy is going to make the news again?"

Gibson's answer was sympathetic but clear: No. "I gather she's going back to Martha's Vineyard," Gibson began.

It's such a sad story. Martha Raddatz [of ABC News] wrote a terrific book about one battle that took place in Iraq, and it was the battle in which Cindy's son was killed. And you look at somebody like that and you think here's somebody who's just trying to find some meaning in her son's death. And you have to be sympathetic to her. Anybody who has given a son to this country has made an enormous sacrifice, and you have to be sympathetic. But enough already.

This week a number of observers have wondered whether the press will cover Sheehan now that she is protesting a war run by Barack Obama as opposed to George W. Bush. Gibson's interview strongly suggests it won't happen.
Posted by:Fred

#14  For me, the Cindy Sheehan mess is a tragedy because it completely drowns out the story of what her son Casey did.

With all due respect, if anyone is responsible for drowning Casey's accomplishments, it would be Cindy.
Posted by: Skunky Glins 5***   2009-08-21 21:59  

#13  Now that Bush is gone, her usefulness to the left has come to an end.
Posted by: DMFD   2009-08-21 19:15  

#12  amen, SteveS
Posted by: Frank G on the road   2009-08-21 19:03  

#11  For me, the Cindy Sheehan mess is a tragedy because it completely drowns out the story of what her son Casey did. He volunteered to go on a rescue mission, a heroic choice that cost him his life. That is what the name Sheehan should mean to us.
Posted by: SteveS   2009-08-21 18:46  

#10  I didnt launch an ideological tirade, I just showed an exactly parallel possibility.

Oh goody - I thought I'd missed the Friday lecture from our Resident Pink.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-08-21 17:24  

#9  Liberal Hawk, leave me out of this.

Strawman
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839   2009-08-21 15:46  

#8  Boys, boys ...


AoS
Posted by: Steve White   2009-08-21 14:56  

#7  I didnt launch an ideological tirade, I just showed an exactly parallel possibility.

As for me, I never had any use for Cindy Sheehan, and I think I made that abundanty clear. Anyone who wants to search RB for examples of me praising her, is free to do so.

If you mean not me, but the press, well again, their job is to report news. IE stuff thats new and novel. You may find it new and novel that Sheehan is protesting against a Democrat. Anyone who remembers the nasty things Sheehan et al said about Hillary, Feinstein, and other democrats, wont find that nearly so novel. And as for her antics per se, yes, those are old.

Except NPR of course. They tend to resuscitate old stuff thats convenient to them when theres an anniversary or other hook. So if you are criticizing NPR or similar, go for it. But the networks, that really do have short memories and want to cover whats novel now, I just dont see the basis for complaint.

Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-08-21 12:17  

#6  I'll never get tired of teabagging. Only a Beta Male could ge tired of that.
Posted by: Mike N.   2009-08-21 11:49  

#5  and as far as "teabaggers"? F*ck off, LH. Your Liberal is showing
Posted by: Frank G on the road   2009-08-21 11:01  

#4  So basically now that the antiwar movement is no longer _useful_ to you it's "old"?
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2009-08-21 10:23  

#3  Used, then discarded.
Posted by: Mike   2009-08-21 09:53  

#2  In fairness, ideology aside, some things just get old.

Only a liberal would preface comments by saying "ideology aside" and then launch into an ideological tirade.

But you are right liberalhawk. Some things get old.
Posted by: badanov   2009-08-21 09:52  

#1  "but enough already."

In fairness, ideology aside, some things just get old. I mean lets say the teabaggers keep on teabagging for the next 3 years. Suppose then, say, Tim Pawlenty is elected POTUS. Suppose his tax policy doesnt thrill the teabaggers (a real possibility) and they keep on teabagging. Will Fox news keep covering them? Or will they just say, rightly, this isnt "news" anymore?

OTOH, Cindy can probably get NPR to do an anniversary piece, if she can wait till 2010.
Posted by: liberal hawk   2009-08-21 09:43  

00:00