Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Climate Change Measure Should Be Set Aside, U.S. Senators Say |
2009-08-15 |
![]() "The problem of doing both of them together is that it becomes too big of a lift," Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas said in an interview last week. "I see the cap-and-trade being a real problem." The resistance by Lincoln and her Senate colleagues undercuts President Barack Obama's effort to win passage of legislation that would cap carbon dioxide emissions and establish a market for trading pollution allowances, said Peter Molinaro, the head of government affairs for Midland, Michigan- based Dow Chemical Co., which supports the measure. "Doing these energy provisions by themselves might make it more difficult to move the cap-and-trade legislation," said Molinaro, who is based in Washington. "In this town if you split two measures, usually the second thing never gets done." The House passed cap-and-trade legislation in June. Leaders of the Democratic-controlled Senate say they are sticking with their plan to combine a version of that bill with a separate measure mandating energy efficiency and the use of renewable sources such as solar and wind power. The legislation also provides for an extension of offshore oil and gas drilling in certain areas, broadening its support. Reid's Comment "I don't think we are going to take to the Senate floor a bill stripped of climate provisions," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada, told reporters in Las Vegas on Aug. 11. The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee passed the renewable-energy legislation, 15-8, in June. Reid has set a deadline of Sept 28 for committees to complete work on climate- change provisions. Ben Nelson of Nebraska and North Dakota Senators Kent Conrad and Byron Dorgan joined Lincoln in suggesting that the climate measure be put off. "We should separate the energy bill from the climate bill," Conrad told reporters this month. 'It needs to be done as soon as we can get it done," he said, referring to the energy legislation. Climate legislation would require 60 votes in the Senate. Most Republicans have said they oppose the cap-and-trade measure, and at least 15 of the Senate's 60-member Democratic majority have said the House-passed version would hurt the economy and needs to be revamped to win their support. |
Posted by:Fred |
#3 There are two battles coming up soon:
Health care reform bill politicos have dropped the section on aging. They are on the defensive. Seize the battle space. Both these bills are just a scam by those in congress and their friends to rip off the taxpayer and the country, just like TARP. If we the people can kill these two bills, then the Big O machine will have suffered two major defeats. That should be enough to shut them down, and congresspeople that voted for them could go down in 2010. This is a watershed moment in US history, and action by the taxpaying public must be taken. |
Posted by: Alaska Paul 2009-08-15 18:24 |
#2 She hasn't: Cap and Tax passed the House, and it's under consideration in the Senate. |
Posted by: Steve White 2009-08-15 09:52 |
#1 Senator Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas said in an interview last week. "I see the cap-and-trade being a real problem." How did you vote last June? |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2009-08-15 02:07 |