You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
U.S. Boosts Secretive Jammer Fleet
2009-07-15
The defense world suffered a minor shock last week, when Marine Gen. James Cartwright, the Joint Chiefs vice chair, said that U.S. generals chose buying more electronics-jamming EA-18G Growlers, over buying more super-dogfightin' F-22 Raptors. Air Force magazine's Daily Report said the Pentagon is "not winning the argument" over F-22s "on the merits," and characterized Cartwright's comments as an "offensive" against the Lockheed-built stealth fighter.

But there's ample evidence that electronic-warfare planes really are more useful in today's wars. In the early days of the Afghanistan conflict, the U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marines cobbled together a makeshift armada of jamming planes -- Air Force EC-130H Compass Calls and Navy and Marine EA-6B Prowlers -- capable of zeroing out the Taliban's communications. That armada subsequently shifted to Iraq, then back to Afghanistan as the Iraq war winds down. Last week, the small Compass Call detachment at Bagram airbase, in Afghanistan, marked its 2,000th Afghanistan mission. "There are only 14 of these aircraft in the Air Force," Maj. James Bands said. "So it's taken four years of constant flying at about 2,000-3,000 hours on one aircraft a year, in order to accomplish this."

The F-22, by contrast, has never flown a single mission over Iraq or Afghanistan, as Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is so fond of pointing out.

The EC-130 was designed during the Cold War to listen in on, and jam, Soviet radio networks. For Afghanistan, BAE Systems added $2-million Special Emitter Array pods. Each pod can steer four, separate beams for jamming a wider range of comms, including cell phones and detonators for roadside bombs. In Iraq in 2006, I was on a patrol with the U.S. Army when a Compass Call flew overhead, wiping out all communications in a wide swath down below, all in an effort to disable insurgent booby traps. The soldiers, "deaf" and "mute" due to the protective jamming, had to sit and wait until the Compass Call finished, before continuing their mission.

For some missions, the EC-130s team up with speedier, armed EA-6B Prowler "penetrating" jammers, according to a 2007 report from Forecast International. Prowlers fly from land bases and aircraft carriers. When I visited Al Asad air base in Iraq in 2006, the EA-6Bs were the only planes that were off limits to reporters. "The two made a good jamming team, with Compass Call linguists providing valuable inputs regarding the selection of jamming targets to the Prowler crews," Forecast said. The EC-130Hs usually "focused on discrete, individual targets," while the Prowlers "jammed broader parts of a net."

The problem with both the EC-130 and EA-6B, is age. The Compass Calls are pushing 40 years old, and the Prowlers aren't much younger. The EA-18G is meant to replace the Prowlers, before they start falling from the sky, from age. No one has identified a Compass Call replacement, quite yet.
It's a C-130 frame. We still make those, don't we?
With roadside bombs on the rise in Afghanistan, and the Taliban continuing to rely heavily on cell phones and radios for comms, it's no wonder U.S. regional commanders are eager for more electronic warfare planes, to feed their aging, ever-busier, jamming armada.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  Secretive Jammer Fleet? Cripes, there will probably be a Congressional hearing and an AG investigation to see if any laws have been broken.
Posted by: JohnQC   2009-07-15 12:43  

#3  If NYT folds, look for all their 'reporters' to get hired by a big, government-funded expansion of NPR and tv.
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-07-15 07:52  

#2  It is the official mouthpiece of the liberal socialist movement. And it is being destroyed, if the government doesn't bail it out. People are starting to stop listening to it and finding their news elsewhere.

NYT can't go belly up soon enough.
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-07-15 07:40  

#1  The G's are long overdue and badly needed, but without the Raptors, they will not live long in hostile airspace. Its even a bigger issue for EW big aircraft like Rivet Joints etc.

People forget that we do not magically have air supremacy in every conflict. And there's no bigger target than one of these massive flying emitters.

What is with this constant trashing of the F-22? Its press obeisance to Obama not wanted any more than the 187 built. The USAF needs 224.

I am beginning to think our press needs to be destroyed and rebuilt from the ground up. Its has become an organ of the state.
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-07-15 01:40  

00:00