You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Incoming IAEA chief: No evidence Iran seeking nuclear weapons
2009-07-04
Blind, deaf, dumb, stupid and corrupt pandering like this needs to be recorded. These people need to be held responsible when the worst happens.
The incoming head of the United Nation's nuclear watchdog said on Friday he did not see any hard evidence that Iran was trying to gain the ability to develop nuclear weapons. "I don't see any evidence in IAEA official documents about this," Japan's Yukiya Amano told Reuters in his first direct comment on Iran's nuclear program since his election to head the International Atomic Energy Agency, when asked whether he believed Iran was seeking a nuclear weapons capability.
I wonder if he'll change his mind when Tel Aviv goes up in a fireball?
Why would he? It's only Tel Aviv, not Tokyo or someplace important to humanity.
Current IAEA head Mohammed ElBaradei told the BBC last month it was his "gut feeling" that Iran was seeking the ability to produce nuclear arms, if it desired, as an "insurance policy" against perceived threats from neighboring countries or the United States. "I'm not going to be a 'soft' director general or a 'tough' director general," Amano told Reuters, when asked how he would approach issues like Iran and Syria, which are both subject to IAEA probes.

Earlier Friday, IAEA members unanimously designated Amano as the organization's next director general, ending a rift between developing and industrialized countries over his nomination. With the official confirmation of his election on Thursday, the Japanese diplomat is now set to assume his post in December, succeeding Mohammed ElBaradei, who retires as director general after 12 years in office.

Amano, Japan's ambassador to the United Nations in Vienna, narrowly won a run-off vote against South African diplomat Abdul Samad Minty. Developing countries backing Minty had for several months blocked Amano's election.
I guess it could have been even worse (shudder).
I think Dr. Khan of Pakistan is at loose ends these days, other than his newspaper columns.
But on Friday, developing countries grouped in the Non-Aligned Movement and the Group of 77 issued statements expressing their support for Amano, 62, who is seen as closely aligned with the United States.

Minty congratulated Amano, and offered his country's support, saying that "our future objective is to assist in fostering a cooperative spirit and to focus on what unites us, namely; creating a better life for all free from the threat of the use of nuclear weapons."

Meanwhile, the Japanese government put high hopes in the next IAEA leader. "We hope that Amano will tackle the nuclear issues in the areas of non-proliferation and disarmament," top government spokesman Takeo Kawamura said in Tokyo.
If Amano had been around in 1945:

"I see no evidence the Americans have an atomic bomb. The disaster in Hiroshima was caused by a gas leak. A big one. Yeah, that's the ticket, a gas leak. And the flash was a secondary in a magnesium flare factory."
Posted by:Atomic Conspiracy

#13  Did ElBaradei get himself some plastic surgery or something?
Posted by: gorb   2009-07-04 17:37  

#12  The IAEA governors have picked the correct man to lead their esteemed organization.

He hasn't even assumed office and he already has the denial thing down pat.

That Nobel Peace Prize is a sure thing.
Posted by: john frum   2009-07-04 15:18  

#11  I'm not really sure why we tolerate such nonsense from the UN. The Human Rights Group have made a mockery of Human Rights. The IAEA is an even bigger joke. The US should hold nations accountable for their votes and start pulling back aid and attention.

The US should push for Japan to become not only a permanent member of the security council but the new home of the UN. We should push for enlargement all around and dillute the power and force the French/Russians and Chinese to fight against it to preserve their little bits of power, thus putting us on the side of the little nations. If it enlarges the UN is weaker, if not, we look better to half of the world. Win/win.

If all of that doesn't work we walk away.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2009-07-04 15:18  

#10  The IAEA, still no evidence that it is actually relevant or worth anything.
Posted by: DarthVader   2009-07-04 13:30  

#9  Nuclear watchdog, ya say? More like a watch-hamster.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2009-07-04 13:08  

#8  Bobby,
On July 16, 1945 we had 1-3 nukes. On July 17 we had one less. On August 9 I don't think we had any. We kept making them and we kept testing them - prove we still have any. Everybody assumes we do, but 'everybody' thought Saddam had WMD too.
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-07-04 13:08  

#7  Nah, Glenmore (#2), I've seen pictures of US tests.

Waitaminute...They could be photoshopped...like the moon landings.

[/moonbat]
Posted by: Bobby   2009-07-04 12:11  

#6  Oh fer Chrissakes. I though if we got a non-muzzie in the position there might be something accomplished. What is it with these guys?
Posted by: Hellfish   2009-07-04 11:34  

#5  Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Posted by: Parabellum   2009-07-04 10:47  

#4  These guys remind me of something from my childhood... AH! That's IT!

Posted by: OldSpook   2009-07-04 10:43  

#3  Yukiya Amano got his Saki goggles on?
Posted by: Besoeker   2009-07-04 09:44  

#2  Bobby,
We have no hard evidence the US has any bombs either. We had some but we used some and took others apart - who really knows how many are left.
Posted by: Glenmore   2009-07-04 08:52  

#1  Depends on what he means by 'hard evidence'. I don't have any 'hard evidence' the Norks have a bomb - it's all just hearsay.

Come to think of it - I personally don't have any 'hard evidence' the Rooskies have a bomb.
Posted by: Bobby   2009-07-04 06:28  

00:00