| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Is Obama "objectively pro-fascist"? |
| 2009-07-01 |
| Roger L. Simon, Pajamas Media I don't know much about Honduras, but I do know something about Iran. And Obama's bizarre behavior, taking days to come to the conclusion any decent person knew immediately, indeed other world leaders like Merkel and Sarkozy had demonstrated as much - that there were very clear good and evil sides in the Iranian election, even though the good wasn't perfect. (Is it ever?) So when I heard that our President had joined Chavez and Castro in condemnation of the supposed coup in Honduras, this time with immediacy, I felt a tightening in the gut. Chavez particularly was on the side of Ahmadinejad in the recent Iranian brutality. This was a side I didn't want to be on, didn't want our country on. I heard many suspicious things about Zelaya, the booted Honduran president, including allegations of drug ties. Also, he was running for succor to the UN, the very organization just weeks ago I had personally seen embrace Ahmadinejad in Geneva. So when I read this message from a Honduran on The Corner, I wasn't surprised. Obama has strange friends. He equivocates and equalizes in disturbing ways. Is he "objectively pro-fascist" as George Orwell memorably wrote in his famous essay "Pacifism and the War"? The answer is pretty obvious. |
| Posted by:Mike |
| #1 If democracy and human rights are high values, then all societies are not morally equal. This thought cuts sharply against Obama's multicultural sensibilities. |
| Posted by: Parabellum 2009-07-01 09:08 |