Submit your comments on this article | ||
Syria-Lebanon-Iran | ||
Iran says partial recount shows election valid | ||
2009-06-29 | ||
![]()
The "meticulous and comprehensive examination" revealed only "slight irregularities that are common to any election and needless of attention," Guardian Council head Ahmed Jannati said in a letter, according to the state TV channel IRIB. Opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi claims he, not incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was the rightful winner and has called for a new election, something the government has repeatedly said it will not do. "From today on, the file on the presidential election has been closed," Guardian Council spokesman Abbas Ali Kadkhodaei said on state-run Press TV. Mousavi supporters have taken to the streets in protest after the election, outraged by official results that gave Ahmadinejad the victory by a roughly 2-1 margin. Police and the feared Basij militia have taken increasingly harsh measures against the demonstrators, prompting widespread international criticism. The recount conducted Monday had appeared to be an attempt to cultivate the image that Iran was seriously addressing fraud claims, while giving no ground in the clampdown on opposition. Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Council already had pronounced the results free of major fraud and insisted that Ahmadinejad won by a landslide. And even if errors were found in nearly every one of the votes in the recount Ahmadinejad, according to the government's count, still would have tallied more votes than Mousavi. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Monday questioned the recount's utility. "They have a huge credibility gap with their own people as to the election process. And I don't think that's going to disappear by any finding of a limited review of a relatively small number of ballots," she told reporters in Washington. Asked if the United States would recognize Ahmadinejad as Iran's legitimate president, she said "We're going to take this a day at a time."
| ||
Posted by:Steve White |
#2 Isn't that what Gore wanted in 2000 - a recount but only in selected known pro-democrat precents. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2009-06-29 22:51 |
#1 Democrats take note, next contested election have a "Recount" but include only the precincts you won overwhelmingly, and declare victory. Hell why not, you're no less thieves than the Iranians. |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2009-06-29 21:54 |