You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
US will not use force to inspect Nork ship
2009-06-27
Bambi folds.
SEOUL, South Korea – The United States will not use force to inspect a North Korean ship suspected of carrying banned goods, an American official was quoted as saying Friday.
So what was the talk all about? You mean the UN resolution was just posturing?
Defense Undersecretary Michele Flournoy met with South Korean officials in Seoul on Friday as the U.S. sought international support for aggressively enforcing a U.N. sanctions resolution aimed at punishing Pyongyang for its second nuclear test last month. The North Korean-flagged ship, Kang Nam 1, is the first to be tracked under the U.N. resolution.

On Thursday, the communist regime organized a massive anti-American rally in Pyongyang where some 100,000 participants vowed to "crush" the U.S. One senior speaker told the crowd that the North will respond to any sanctions or U.S. provocations with "an annihilating blow." That was seen as a pointed threat in response to the American destroyer.
It was idiotic, and only idiots believe that the demonstration meant anything. That includes the reporter and, apparently, Bambi ...
Flournoy said Friday that Washington has ruled the use military force to inspect the North Korean freighter. "The U.N. resolution lays out a regime that has a very clear set of steps," Flournoy said, according to the Yonhap news agency. "I want to be very clear ... This is not a resolution that sponsors, that authorizes use of force for interdiction."
It wasn't a resolution that did anything, in fact. China won again.
Flournoy said the U.S. still has "incentives and disincentives that will get North Korea to change course."
None that mean anything, of course, but all sorts of options ...
lournoy's trip came as the U.S. sought international support for aggressively enforcing the U.N. sanctions.

It is not clear what was on board the North Korean freighter, but officials have mentioned artillery and other conventional weaponry. One intelligence expert suspected missiles.

The U.S. and its allies have made no decision on whether to request inspection of the ship, Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said Wednesday in Washington, but North Korea has said it would consider any interception an act of war.

If permission for inspection is refused, the ship must dock at a port of its choosing, so local authorities can check its cargo. Vessels suspected of carrying banned goods must not be offered bunkering services at port, such as fuel, the resolution says.

A senior U.S. defense official said the ship had cleared the Taiwan Strait. He said he didn't know whether or when the Kang Nam may need to stop in some port to refuel, but that the ship has in the past stopped in Hong Kong's port.

Another U.S. defense official said he tended to doubt reports that the Kang Nam was carrying nuclear-related equipment, saying information seems to indicate the cargo is banned conventional munitions. North Korea is suspected to have transported banned goods to Myanmar before on the Kang Nam, said Bertil Lintner, a Bangkok-based North Korea expert who has written a book about leader Kim Jong Il.
Posted by:Steve White

#12  Zero, like Chamberlain, is going to get a lot of good people killed.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2009-06-27 22:44  

#11  Obama - Blink
Posted by: Chief   2009-06-27 21:28  

#10  President Obama's foreign policy is a joke to our enemies and an embarrassment to our nation. He's a bathtub Admiral at best.
Posted by: Don Vito Crolutle2068   2009-06-27 18:08  

#9  You don't extend an open hand to the clenched fist. The MMs of Iran sense weakness, now the Norks and their little experiment sense weakness, and certainly the Chicoms do, too. The Big O has made it perfectly clear that the US will not take a line-in-the-sand stand for anything.

And in doing so, he will accelerate the world into war---the very war that he thinks his ideology will prevent. God help us all.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2009-06-27 13:07  

#8  Hong Kong is the other option. The Chinese won't inhibit the ship's travel. If it's conventional weapons to Myannmar, the PRC might have even paid for the cargo in the first place.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-06-27 11:43  

#7  Obama is a ...
Posted by: DMFD   2009-06-27 10:56  

#6  Again, can't we offer the Vietnamese more than China and the Norks can? China and Vietnam aren't exactly on the best of terms.
Posted by: Steve White   2009-06-27 10:51  

#5  A lot will depend on where the ship pulls in for fuel. Singapore is pretty tough - they would insist on a thorough inspection. Vietnam and other countries, not so much.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2009-06-27 08:40  

#4  I thought we never planned to use force, only to shadow the ship until it reached port. At which point the port authorities would demand inspection before permitting refueling and so forth.
Posted by: trailing wife   2009-06-27 08:24  

#3  Doesn't the US have the capacity to detect radioactive isotopes from a distance? Of course, that wouldn't help with things like centrifuges or a bomb chassis or a missile.
Posted by: gorb   2009-06-27 05:35  

#2  What are they supposed to use, harsh language?
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-06-27 05:32  

#1  The United States will not use force to inspect a North Korean ship

Of course not. All the Jedi are gone now.
Posted by: eLarson   2009-06-27 00:06  

00:00