| Submit your comments on this article |
| Economy |
| Break Through: Palin/Exxon Mobil/Trans-Canada Ensure America's Energy Future |
| 2009-06-16 |
| Pipeline, Not Pipe Dream: Credit Palin Exxon Mobil's surprise decision to join Trans-Canada on a vast Alaska gas pipeline project is a big step toward making the U.S. self-sufficient in domestic energy. By defying naysayers, Sarah Palin is now vindicated. It must be sweet vindication for Alaska's governor. Against critics who said her 1,712-mile natural gas pipeline project would never get off the ground, who should the project bag but the "big gorilla" of American energy -- Exxon Mobil. In a major surprise, Exxon announced Thursday that it had forged a partnership with TransCanada, the Canadian pipeline company that holds the state license for Palin's $126 billion Alaska Gasoline Inducement Act project. It's a big vote of confidence in Palin's top project from a by-the-books company known for its rigid investment standards. "We evaluated all the options and it came down to our belief that this approach with TransCanada and Exxon Mobil was going to be the most successful project," said Marty Massey, U.S. joint interest manager of Exxon Mobil Production Co. He said Exxon might look at expanding its participation. Rival oil firms had whispered to IBD that it would never happen. "It's gonna happen and we're very excited about this development," Palin told "Good Morning America" on Friday. Doubters of Palin's pipeline plan were numerous. Some said the pipeline would be too big to work, and that a rival BP/ConocoPhillips project, called Denali, would doom Palin's plan because Alaska didn't have enough natural gas for both. Exxon's tilt toward TransCanada suggests the oil giant believes that's not true. Exxon is America's largest company, with extraction rights to a third of all Alaska's gas reserves. It can use them to fill either pipeline. "We will make a decision based on commercial reality," Massey said. "But ... why would we put our money and not our gas in the pipeline?" Obama administration officials who had nothing to do with this, like Energy Secretary Ken Salazar, rushed to claim credit too. What better vote of confidence could there be? Other doubters had suggested the pipeline could never happen because of a global gas glut, making the pipeline uneconomical. But with the project slated for completion in 2018, and the need for natural gas expected to rise between 20% and 40% by 2030, it's precisely now that such a project should be built. "I think it's very shortsighted" to assume that"market conditions are going to stay as they are today," Palin told CNN. In an interview with IBD last July when gasoline hit $4 at the pump, she noted that if drilling had started in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge just five years ago, when policymakers were dismissing the idea of $100-a-barrel oil, "we wouldn't be in our predicament today." Palin was in Dallas last week working to make sure the Exxon-Mobil fell into place. |
| Posted by:Jating Angereth6241 |
| #5 too bad the reserves in AK/Canada would be burned up by us here in the USA /Canada in about 3 months.... there isnt that much in those reserves people! |
| Posted by: 746 2009-06-16 23:03 |
| #4 No problem. Obama will just make the natural gas reserves 'off limits' to development. Must be some spotted blow-fly or beetle or something on the brink of extinction somewhere up there. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2009-06-16 18:06 |
| #3 Watch this season's "Ice Road Truckers" for an account of the Dalton Highway' transport grinder. Flat Canadian Arctic lands, with Winter river truck runs, offer easier transport and supply routes. Sea Tankers must be US owned and operated. I wonder if there isn't some lower-48 moves against the Palin' initiative? |
| Posted by: Black Bart Sliter4867 2009-06-16 17:27 |
| #2 Sarah is a hell of a lot smarter than her critics, the MSM, the pointy-headed pundits and late night so-called jokesters. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2009-06-16 12:49 |
| #1 If the Democrats and eco-Luddites (I repeat myself) don't want the pipeline to the lower 48, the Canadians will take that cheap gas, process w/ tar sands and sell expensive oil to our limousine and private jet loving overlords. |
| Posted by: ed 2009-06-16 11:35 |