You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Former British commander in Afghanistan says Treasury is crippling war
2009-06-11
The British military operation in Afghanistan was crippled by a spending cap imposed by the Treasury, a former senior officer told MPs yesterday. Brigadier Ed Butler, who commanded 16 Air Assault Brigade in Helmand province in 2006, told the Defence Select Committee that the financial constraints meant that the Army could “just about hold the line, but couldn’t sustain a higher tempo” in its campaign against the Taleban.

The brigadier resigned his commission last year, claiming that he wanted to spend more time with his family. But his premature resignation was widely acknowledged to be in protest at the handling of operations.

His brigade suffered high casualties during its six-month tour. Thirty-five members of the Armed Forces died during the brigadeÂ’s tour of duty, although 14 of these were killed when an RAF Nimrod caught fire in mid-air and exploded.

Many soldiers who were killed by enemy action died in isolated outposts such as Musa Qala in northern Helmand where the Taleban launched multiple attacks on the district centre, which was being guarded by only a 30-man platoon.

Brigadier Butler told the committee that in 2006 the Treasury had “capped” resources available for the operation, limiting funding to £1.3 billion for a “three-year campaign”. The Government has always denied imposing a cap on resources for the mission. “There was a Treasury-imposed cap on the number of troops we could have in Afghanistan,” he said.

With the troops available to him — 3,300 — “we could just about hold the line but we couldn’t sustain a higher tempo”. Brigadier Butler said he was visited by numerous ministers during his tour of command but not once by a Treasury minister.
Posted by:Bright Pebbles

#10  Pappy, FTW.
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-06-11 23:41  

#9  It is the opium, stupid.

well, that certainly accounts for the... quality... of your comment.
Posted by: Pappy   2009-06-11 16:13  

#8  Yes, that's also O(Shit)s plan, to bankrupt America so we cannot afford to fight, and thereby save the Muslim world.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2009-06-11 14:37  

#7  Is that who drooled that?
Posted by: Fred   2009-06-11 13:27  

#6  Well, it looks like Lyndon Larouche dropped by...
Posted by: tu3031   2009-06-11 09:08  

#5  Well, City of London and the Empire flourishes on opium money. You guys were sent there not to spend money on, but to bring in the cash. You guys should help the illegal stash of opium money gets to the offshore banks from where the City of London will do the needful. It is the opium, stupid.
Posted by: Gravilet Lumplump5505   2009-06-11 07:19  

#4  This isn't surprising. Brown made it clear he intended to cut off funding when he came into power. He did his best to do so earlier as Chancellor.

Whatever their limitations or faults, Bush and Blair were ten times better than their successors.
Posted by: lotp   2009-06-11 06:48  

#3  and lazy jobless chavs

/facepalm
Posted by: Unash Big Foot4389   2009-06-11 06:34  

#2  "So sorry brigadier---we need the money to pay for the 8 child families of Muslim immigrants"
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2009-06-11 02:02  

#1  Consider the costs of not fighting. Got a few thousand lives and smoking holes in the ground here that make the current cost in trashcanistan pale in comparison.
Posted by: OldSpook   2009-06-11 00:08  

00:00